Hotel Self-Service Kiosk vs. MyStay Check in: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 43 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

iOneSoft Solutions 表现出色 .

MyStay 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 与 MyStay Check in 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
22
推荐可能性
0%
98%
易用性
0.0/5
4.9/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.9/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.9/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $400/mo
经验证的评价 0 43

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 与 MyStay Check in 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,iOneSoft Solutions 用户最看重其 ,而 MyStay 用户则强调 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
优点
+ 无接触办理入住
+ 宾客体验
+ 宾客沟通
+ 支持与持续改进
缺点
定制选项
与 PMS 集成
系统速度和性能

iOneSoft Solutions 对比 MyStay:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
小型(10-24 间客房) #5 15 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #6 10 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #4 7 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 3 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
精品酒店 #5 12 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 11 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #5 12 条评价
长住酒店 #6 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
北美 #7 3 条评价
欧洲 #4 32 条评价
亚太 #6 2 条评价
中东 #4 2 条评价

The Decision

When selecting a contactless check-in solution, your hotel needs a system that streamlines operations, delights guests, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. Both iOneSoft Solutions and MyStay aim to fulfill these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and customer support. Given the recent surge in reviews for MyStay, it currently offers more reliable and recent data, making it the more confident choice for hoteliers seeking a proven solution.

Are you ready to see which platform better aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?

Is iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay Better for Hotels?

Both iOneSoft Solutions’ Hotel Self-Service Kiosk and MyStay Check-in solve the fundamental problem of reducing front desk congestion and enabling contactless guest interactions. However, iOneSoft’s kiosk primarily focuses on physical self-service check-in/out, while MyStay offers a comprehensive digital platform that handles pre-arrival, during-stay, and post-stay engagement.

MyStay also boasts a much larger review base with 40 reviews and recent activity, whereas iOneSoft has none. This review volume and recency give MyStay a substantial edge in demonstrating ongoing customer satisfaction and feature updates.

Are you looking for a dedicated kiosk hardware solution or a digital platform with extensive features?

Is iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay Easier to Use?

iOneSoft’s kiosk solution is inherently physical, meaning it’s straightforward for guests to interact with but requires hardware setup and maintenance, which can be complex. Conversely, MyStay’s software-based platform is praised for its intuitive interface, with a 4.91/5 ease-of-use rating, and is designed for quick onboarding—rated at 4.82/5.

Reviewers consistently highlight how simple it is to implement MyStay, with many noting that their staff adapted rapidly. The digital nature of MyStay makes it more flexible and easier to update without additional hardware.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Features: iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay?

iOneSoft Solutions offers no additional features beyond its core kiosk check-in/out module. In contrast, MyStay provides 14 distinct features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, offer templates, digital payments, door lock integration, and self-service checkout.

The breadth of features in MyStay enables a more holistic guest experience and operational control, making it suitable for hotels aiming to automate multiple touchpoints. The absence of extra features in iOneSoft’s solution limits its ability to support broader hotel operations.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Customer Support: iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay?

iOneSoft Solutions has no reviews or data on customer support, which raises questions about ongoing assistance and responsiveness. Meanwhile, MyStay boasts a customer support rating of 4.93/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and continuous updates. One hotelier remarked, “Support is prompt and helpful, which makes all the difference when implementing new technology.”

Given recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings, MyStay clearly offers a more reliable and attentive support experience.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Has More Integrations: iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay?

iOneSoft Solutions has no verified integrations listed, severely limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems. Conversely, MyStay integrates with 30+ partners, including major PMS solutions like Priority Software, Kwentra, and RoomRaccoon, alongside key tools such as channel managers and digital lock systems.

This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies data synchronization and operational workflows, making MyStay more adaptable for hotels with existing tech stacks.

Edge: MyStay.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: iOneSoft Solutions or MyStay?

MyStay’s reviews are recent, with a total of 40 reviews and an average rating of 5/5, and a remarkable NPS score of 9.8/10. Hotels across segments—such as serviced apartments, boutique hotels, and city-center properties—highlight its ease of use, speed, and revenue-enhancing features.

In contrast, iOneSoft Solutions has no reviews or recent user feedback, making it impossible to gauge current customer satisfaction. The recent, plentiful positive feedback for MyStay strongly indicates its effectiveness and reliability.

Edge: MyStay.

How Much Do iOneSoft Solutions and MyStay Cost?

iOneSoft Solutions does not publicly list its pricing or offer a free trial, suggesting a potentially custom or opaque pricing model. MyStay charges a flat rate of $400 per month, with no hidden implementation or setup fees, making costs transparent and predictable.

Given the comprehensive feature set and recent reviews, the $400/month fee for MyStay is a reasonable investment for mid-sized hotels seeking a full suite of contactless tools.

If you prefer a straightforward, predictable pricing model with extensive features, MyStay is the clear choice.

What Type of Hotel Should Use iOneSoft Solutions?

  • Hotels that prioritize physical self-service kiosks for check-in/out, especially those with high guest volume or limited front desk staff.
  • Teams seeking a dedicated, hardware-based solution for quick, independent guest interactions.
  • Properties with existing hardware infrastructure and minimal need for extensive digital features.
  • Not ideal if your hotel requires seamless integration with PMS, guest communication, or revenue-generating tools.

The kiosk approach suits properties wanting to modernize check-in processes with minimal digital complexity but lacks flexibility for broader operational automation.

What Type of Hotel Should Use MyStay?

  • Hotels seeking a comprehensive digital guest journey, including pre-arrival, during stay, and post-stay engagement.
  • Teams wanting extensive automation, from communication to upselling, with easy integration into existing PMS and other tools.
  • Properties aiming to reduce staffing costs significantly while maintaining high guest satisfaction.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers physical kiosks or has negligible digital infrastructure needs.

MyStay is ideal for properties that want a flexible, feature-rich platform to enhance guest experience, streamline operations, and increase revenue.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

MyStay and iOneSoft Solutions target different hotel needs: physical self-service kiosks versus full digital guest management. While iOneSoft offers straightforward check-in/out hardware, it lacks recent reviews, integrations, and a broad feature set.

For hotel operators prioritizing contactless convenience, operational automation, and guest engagement—especially with a proven track record—MyStay outperforms significantly. Its extensive features, positive recent reviews, and high guest satisfaction ratings make it the smarter, more dependable choice today.

Choose MyStay if you want a versatile, well-supported platform that can grow with your hotel. Opt for iOneSoft if your focus is solely on physical kiosks and minimal digital automation, understanding its limited scope.


Note: This evaluation is based on recent reviews, feature comparisons, and market presence data, providing a clear, fact-based guide to help your hotel make an informed decision.

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 和 MyStay Check in 的价格是多少?

非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
Starting Price From $400/mo

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 有哪些 MyStay Check in 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 和 MyStay Check in 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 iOneSoft Solutions MyStay MyStay
分割
多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天)
客户细分与定向
客房升级商品
经前管理系统整合
辅助产品营销

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。

iOneSoft Solutions 对比 MyStay:总结

iOneSoft Solutions
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
MyStay
MyStay
4.9/5 来自 43 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

无接触办理入住 100% 正面

评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。

宾客体验 84% 正面

评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。

宾客沟通 97% 正面

许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制选项 55% 负面

用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。

与 PMS 集成 43% 负面

MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。

独特功能

经前管理系统整合 客户细分与定向 客房升级商品 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) 辅助产品营销
4.9/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 30 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 MyStay 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
易用性 MyStay 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
客户支持 MyStay 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
性价比 MyStay 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
入职培训 MyStay 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

关于 Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 与 MyStay Check in 的常见问题

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 能否替代 MyStay Check in?

这取决于您的需求。Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 和 MyStay Check in 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay Check in 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 或 MyStay Check in 是否提供免费方案?

Hotel Self-Service Kiosk:否。MyStay Check in:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Hotel Self-Service Kiosk 和 MyStay Check in?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。iOneSoft Solutions 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息