The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Hotel.care 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest CRM.
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 58 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Hotel.care 用户最看重其 ,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #75 0 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #55 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Hotel.care by Hotel.care and OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline reservations and operations but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Hotel.care, despite its innovative MACH architecture, has not yet accumulated user reviews, making it a less proven option. Conversely, OpenHotel boasts a substantial review base, recent positive feedback, and a comprehensive feature set, positioning it as the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Hotel.care is a cloud-based system built on API-first principles, promising unmatched flexibility and customization. Yet, it remains largely untested in real-world hotel environments, with no reviews in recent months and a zero overall rating. OpenHotel, with over 57 recent reviews averaging 4.81/5 and a 9.53/5 NPS score, demonstrates proven performance, user satisfaction, and ongoing support. Given the lack of recent Hotel.care feedback, OpenHotel's current market presence makes it the safer recommendation.
Do you need an established solution with verified customer satisfaction, or are you exploring a flexible, headless platform? Your decision should reflect your hotel’s comfort with unreviewed solutions versus proven performance.
If your hotel needs an intuitive, comprehensive PMS with proven customer support, go with OpenHotel. Its well-rounded features, ease of use, and extensive reviews point to a reliable track record for small to medium properties. Hotel.care, with its API-first architecture and flexible design, may appeal if your team values customization and plans to develop tailored integrations—though its lack of recent reviews makes risk assessment difficult.
For most hoteliers seeking a trusted, feature-rich PMS, OpenHotel offers better immediate confidence and proven results. Hotel.care's approach suits tech-savvy teams with specific integration needs willing to accept untested waters.
OpenHotel scores a 4.71/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple booking grid, and straightforward group management. Users often mention that it feels modern and accessible, even for less tech-savvy staff, and that onboarding is smooth, with excellent customer support. Hotel.care has no user reviews, so its UX cannot be verified, but given its API-driven design, it may require a steeper learning curve or developer input.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Hotel.care offers 24 features, including guest CRM, online check-in/out, task management, and guest messaging, along with specialized tools like PCI and GDPR compliance and a mobile app. It also boasts unique features such as automated space optimization and rate management, not available in OpenHotel. OpenHotel's core strengths lie in its yield management, OTA integrations, and group booking tools, with only three exclusive features like EPoS and housekeeping.
While Hotel.care has more features, OpenHotel's focus on core hotel operations and recent feature enhancements make it more practical.
Edge: Hotel.care, due to its broader feature set.
OpenHotel consistently receives 4.82/5 support ratings, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance, especially during system transitions and emergencies. Customers note the personalized service, with staff like Peter and Valerie receiving praise for patience and expertise. Hotel.care lacks review data, which makes it impossible to assess its support quality. Based on current evidence, OpenHotel’s support is notably strong and reliable.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel has 12 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and tools like SiteMinder and RateGain. Hotel.care, with only three verified partners, includes Hotek Hospitality Group, Pitchup.com, and Stripe. The broader integration ecosystem of OpenHotel provides more operational flexibility, especially for properties relying on diverse third-party tools.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel's recent reviews reveal an average rating of 4.81/5, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, especially from small to medium properties and budget-conscious segments. Hotel.care has no reviews, so its user satisfaction cannot be gauged. Given the recent feedback, OpenHotel clearly outperforms in user ratings and recommendation scores.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Hotel.care charges a flat $500/month fee, with no free tier or trial available. OpenHotel’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but it offers a transparent, subscription-based model with no implementation fees or per-booking charges, and a no-trial policy. The lack of pricing transparency on OpenHotel's side might be a consideration, but its proven value and comprehensive features justify the expense.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in proven performance versus innovative flexibility. OpenHotel provides a reliable, user-friendly PMS with recent reviews, extensive integrations, and strong support—ideal for most hotels looking for stability. Hotel.care offers a modern, API-first platform optimized for technically equipped teams seeking tailored solutions, though its lack of recent review data adds uncertainty.
Choose OpenHotel if your priority is dependable, easy-to-use software with proven results and broad support. Hotel.care could be suitable if your team has the technical resources to exploit its headless architecture and customize extensively.
For most hotels, OpenHotel’s proven track record and recent positive feedback make it the more practical, low-risk choice. Hotel.care represents an innovative alternative best suited for highly tech-savvy properties willing to navigate untested waters.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hotel.care 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享 20 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 15 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotel.care 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotel.care 提供 4 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotel.care:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotel.care 的 HT Score 为 0,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问