The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Hotellinx Systems 表现出色 .
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 58 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Hotellinx Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 54 条评价 |
Choosing between Hotellinx by Hotellinx Systems and OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both aim to manage daily operations, reservations, and guest interactions, but they approach these challenges differently. Hotellinx offers a broad, comprehensive platform, while OpenHotel focuses on ease of use and integrated features. Are you looking for a system with extensive modules or one that’s more streamlined and user-friendly?
Hotellinx’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating suggest limited current support or updates, making it difficult to rely on for day-to-day operations. Conversely, OpenHotel boasts a high score, a large number of recent reviews, and a 95% likelihood of recommendation, indicating strong current performance. Does your hotel need proven ongoing support, or are you willing to explore a newer, more favored platform?
Hotellinx’s system aims to serve all hospitality types, from resorts to apartments, with a focus on streamlining operations through modules like reservations, billing, and housekeeping. However, the absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating cast doubt on its current viability or support. OpenHotel, on the other hand, is a recent market leader with 57 reviews in the last six months, emphasizing its active development and support.
OpenHotel’s reviews highlight its ease of use, robust channel management, and continuous updates, making it a more reliable choice today. Hotellinx, with no recent feedback, appears dormant or unsupported, raising questions about its suitability. Should you prioritize a system with current user validation, or are you comfortable with an outdated platform?
If your hotel needs a modern, feature-rich PMS with excellent support, choose OpenHotel. Its 4.81-star rating, 57 recent reviews, and diverse modules—including channel management, revenue tools, and online support—make it ideal for small to medium-sized properties aiming for operational efficiency.
If, however, your hotel desires a broad, legacy system with a focus on traditional management without the need for recent updates or reviews, Hotellinx might seem appealing—though, given zero recent feedback, this is a risky choice. For most hotels today, OpenHotel’s active development and high satisfaction scores make it the safer, more effective option.
OpenHotel’s user-friendly interface scores 4.71/5, with reviews praising its intuitive layout, simple reservation management, and seamless onboarding experience, rated 4.61/5. Users also commend its straightforward navigation, saving staff time and reducing training burdens.
Hotellinx, with a 0/5 UI rating and no recent reviews, signals a lack of support and updates, potentially making it difficult for staff to adopt or operate effectively today. Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel offers 23 distinct features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest communication tools, online support, and group booking capabilities. These modules are designed to cover most hotel management needs in a single, integrated platform.
Hotellinx, with no additional features listed and a 0/5 rating, appears to lack current functionality or development. Its absence of modules limits adaptability and growth potential. Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel’s customer support scores 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing the responsiveness, helpfulness, and personal service of their support team. Users consistently mention quick assistance and ongoing support during system transitions or emergencies.
Hotellinx’s support is not rated or reviewed recently, suggesting a lack of active support or unresolved issues. Given the positive feedback on OpenHotel’s customer service, it clearly holds the advantage. Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel boasts 12 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment processors, and guest communication tools, with notable shared partners like SiteMinder. Hotellinx has only 6 verified partners, with fewer well-known integrations, limiting its connectivity options.
For hotels relying on a broad ecosystem of third-party services, OpenHotel’s extensive integration network offers more flexibility and scalability. Edge: OpenHotel.
With 57 recent reviews, OpenHotel’s 4.81/5 rating reflects high user satisfaction across various property types, especially in small to medium hotels and resorts. Hotellinx’s rating of 0/5 and lack of recent reviews indicate no current positive user feedback.
Hotels that value active support, intuitive use, and ongoing updates will favor OpenHotel’s proven reputation. Hotellinx’s outdated status makes it less appealing to today’s hoteliers. Edge: OpenHotel.
Pricing for Hotellinx is not publicly available, and no trial information is provided. It may involve custom quotes or legacy licensing, adding uncertainty.
OpenHotel charges no upfront fee or per-booking charges, with transparent, subscription-based models. Its straightforward pricing, combined with high value, makes budgeting easier. Since Hotellinx’s costs are unclear, OpenHotel offers a clearer financial proposition. Edge: OpenHotel.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in support and current market activity. OpenHotel is actively supported, regularly updated, and highly rated, while Hotellinx has not received recent reviews or upgrades, diminishing its reliability.
Choose OpenHotel if your hotel values ease of use, ongoing development, and excellent customer service, especially for small to mid-sized properties aiming for growth. Its recent reviews and broad feature set make it the smarter, safer choice.
Hotellinx might appeal if you need a legacy system with no need for recent updates, but the lack of current feedback and support suggests it's better to look elsewhere. Its outdated reputation and limited integration make it less suitable for today’s hospitality demands.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers assessing today’s market, OpenHotel offers a more reliable, feature-rich, and supported platform—making it the clear choice for your property management needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hotellinx 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
Hotellinx Systems
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotellinx 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotellinx 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotellinx:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotellinx Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问