The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 64 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting and Referral Reporting.
RateGain 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Facebook conversion tracking.
基于 HTR 上 64 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 41 | 23 |
在分析了 64 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 客户支持, 易于使用, 渠道管理,而 RateGain 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #19 16 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #29 9 条评价 | #18 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #31 0 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 1 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 22 条评价 | #23 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #22 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #19 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #33 1 条评价 | #26 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #26 1 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 12 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #20 3 条评价 | #9 15 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 16 条评价 | #5 6 条评价 |
Choosing between HotelRunner’s Booking Engine and RateGain’s Hotel Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings and streamline reservation management but differ significantly in features, user experience, and regional presence. Your decision should focus on the scale of your operation, geographic reach, and preferred integrations.
HotelRunner boasts a higher overall rating, more recent reviews, and a broader feature set, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. RateGain, while less reviewed and regionally limited, offers a straightforward booking experience for specific markets. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
HotelRunner’s strength lies in its extensive feature set, strong user ratings, and global presence, making it suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive management solutions. RateGain, with a lower review count and limited regional coverage, focuses on ease of use and quick setup but lacks some advanced features found in HotelRunner.
Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings—HotelRunner through customizable options and integrated marketing tools, RateGain through a simple, fast booking interface. The choice depends on whether you prioritize a feature-rich system or a straightforward booking experience.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform that manages bookings, channels, and marketing campaigns across multiple regions, HotelRunner is the clear choice. Its 40 recent reviews and 4.5/5 overall rating (versus RateGain’s zero ratings) provide better confidence in reliability and support.
For boutique hotels, B&Bs, or properties focused on quick, easy online bookings without extensive customization, RateGain’s straightforward approach might suffice. However, given HotelRunner’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and broader regional reach, it offers a more dependable solution for hotels aiming to grow their direct bookings and operational control.
HotelRunner’s user interface is rated 4.73/5, with most users praising its intuitive navigation, quick setup, and support responsiveness. Recent reviews highlight its straightforward onboarding process, even for users with limited technical skills.
RateGain’s UI scores 4.71/5, with reviews emphasizing its simplicity and quick learning curve. Reviewers find it easy to train staff and manage bookings, making it suitable for properties prioritizing ease of use over extensive customization.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 27 shared features plus 13 exclusive functionalities, including advanced options like tariffs, pooled inventory, automated reporting, website integration, and special modules for weddings and corporate bookings. These features allow for a highly customizable experience tailored to diverse property types.
RateGain provides only 1 exclusive feature—Facebook conversion tracking—and shares 27 features with HotelRunner. Its offerings focus more on core booking functions, lacking the depth of HotelRunner’s extensive feature set.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s customer support scores 4.8/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, especially via WhatsApp, and effective issue resolution. Users frequently mention support as a key reason for their continued loyalty.
RateGain’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.76/5, with reviews describing the support team as timely and helpful, though some mention occasional delays. Overall, HotelRunner’s support is marginally favored by users.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and Agoda, plus proprietary solutions like protel and Stripe. Its partnerships cover essential distribution channels but are fewer compared to RateGain.
RateGain boasts 95 verified integrations, including a wide array of PMS, channel managers, and software providers such as Profitroom and HotelTime. Its extensive partner network offers broader connectivity for larger or more complex hotel ecosystems.
Edge: RateGain.
HotelRunner’s reviews are recent, totaling 40, with a 4.5/5 rating and an NPS of 9.33/10, indicating high satisfaction. Hoteliers in various segments, especially boutique hotels and B&Bs, frequently praise its customization and support.
RateGain’s reviews are less recent, with only 21 reviews and no current rating, making it difficult to gauge recent satisfaction. Based on available data, HotelRunner’s higher and more current ratings favor it.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner charges a flat monthly fee of $100, with no freemium or implementation costs, offering predictable pricing for small to mid-sized hotels. RateGain’s base price is $400 per month, also without freemium options, making it more expensive but potentially more comprehensive.
Both platforms do not list trial options or discounts publicly, so costs should be confirmed directly. However, HotelRunner’s lower price point makes it more accessible for smaller properties.
HotelRunner and RateGain target different hotel segments and operational needs. HotelRunner excels in offering a broad feature set, regional reach, and high user satisfaction, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable booking platform.
RateGain is geared toward properties wanting a quick, easy-to-use booking engine with broad integrations, particularly in specific regions. Its limited recent reviews and regional focus make it less suitable for hotels looking for long-term, feature-rich solutions.
If you want a dependable, well-supported platform with extensive features, choose HotelRunner. For a simple, no-fuss booking engine with fast setup, RateGain is an option.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and growth potential, HotelRunner is the recommended choice. If simplicity and quick deployment outweigh advanced features, RateGain may serve your needs—though its limited recent review data warrants caution.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而受到赞誉。用户对通过各种沟通渠道(包括 WhatsApp)提供的及时帮助表示赞赏。
该平台以其用户友好的界面和易于导航而闻名,使得具有不同技术专长的酒店经营者可以轻松进行设置和管理。
用户称赞 Hotelrunner 拥有强大的渠道管理功能,可与众多 OTA 无缝同步。这可消除重复预订并简化库存管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
集成预订引擎因推动直接预订和允许定制套餐而备受好评。许多用户欣赏创建 OTA 列表的便捷性,这有助于提高入住率和收入。
用户强调需要更加强大和可定制的报告工具来帮助制定利率策略决策,这反映了未来改进的一个关键领域。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 和 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RateGain Hotel Booking Engine 提供 95 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Booking Engine by HotelRunner:否。RateGain Hotel Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 74,RateGain 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问