Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping vs. Quore (Cleanings Plus): 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 50 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 50 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Access.

Quore 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 50 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
22
推荐可能性
97%
96%
易用性
5.0/5
4.6/5
客户支持
2.8/5
4.6/5
性价比
4.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 3 47

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 50 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 Quore 用户则强调 任务管理, 跨部门沟通, 嘉宾互动。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore
优点
+ 任务管理
+ 跨部门沟通
+ 嘉宾互动
+ 培训资源
缺点
用户界面和体验
功能请求和改进
应用程序性能

Amadeus 对比 Quore:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore
小型(10-24 间客房) #16 0 条评价 #13 1 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #17 1 条评价 #7 28 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #15 2 条评价 #6 12 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #12 0 条评价 #7 4 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore
精品酒店 #17 1 条评价 #7 14 条评价
豪华酒店 #16 1 条评价 #8 12 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #17 1 条评价 #5 41 条评价
长住酒店 #18 0 条评价 #5 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore
北美 #11 2 条评价 #2 42 条评价
欧洲 #14 0 条评价 #16 0 条评价
亚太 #13 0 条评价 #10 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing a housekeeping management software is a pivotal decision for your hotel, impacting operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and staff productivity. Both Amadeus' HotSOS® Housekeeping and Quore (Cleanings Plus) aim to streamline communication, automate tasks, and improve room turnover times. However, they differ significantly in their user feedback, support quality, and feature sets, making it crucial to understand which aligns best with your specific needs.

While both tools serve the same core purpose, your choice hinges on factors like ease of use, support responsiveness, integration capabilities, and proven hotelier satisfaction. Which platform will truly elevate your housekeeping operations?


Is Amadeus or Quore Better for Hotels?

Amadeus' HotSOS® Housekeeping is a longstanding player in hotel operations, boasting a broad regional presence and enterprise-level integrations. It offers a suite of features including two-way PMS integration, open API, and an inspection module designed to optimize behind-the-scenes work. Despite its comprehensive capabilities, recent reviews reveal that support and communication from account managers often fall short, with some users waiting weeks for responses.

In contrast, Quore (Cleanings Plus) has a smaller but rapidly growing user base, mainly praised for its intuitive mobile app, real-time notifications, and task management. It holds a significantly higher customer support rating, with 4.58/5 compared to Amadeus’ 1.83/5, and recent reviews confirm faster, more responsive assistance. Both tools solve scheduling and task-tracking issues, but Quore’s emphasis on user-friendly design and support makes it more appealing for properties prioritizing staff adoption.

Do you prioritize a mature, feature-rich solution with extensive integrations, or a more nimble, highly supported platform?


Quore vs Amadeus: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a housekeeping system that excels in communication, mobile usability, and quick support, Quore is the clear choice. Its 46 reviews and 4.59/5 rating showcase a strong, recent endorsement from hoteliers who value real-time notifications and task clarity, especially in independent and mid-sized hotels.

If you require a solution with advanced automation, open API access, and a broader feature set for complex operations—particularly in resorts or large properties—Amadeus offers more in-depth tools like compensation tracking and inspection modules. However, its lower support ratings and limited recent reviews suggest it may be less responsive to user needs.

For most hotels seeking reliable support and user-friendly operation, Quore stands out as the more dependable option today.


Is Amadeus or Quore Easier to Use?

Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, thanks to its straightforward interface, comprehensive onboarding, and high adaptability. Its navigation is designed for complex operations, enabling staff to quickly learn and deploy features such as real-time room updates and PMS integration.

Quore, rated at 4.6/5, is praised for its intuitive mobile app and clear task management, which facilitates quicker staff onboarding and day-to-day operations. Users frequently mention its simple layout and effective communication features, reducing training time.

Edge: Amadeus.


Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or Quore?

Amadeus offers 35 features, including late checkouts, multi-language UI, open API, and an inspection module, supporting complex operational needs. Its exclusive features like compensation tracking and two-way PMS integration are particularly valuable for larger or multi-property hotels.

Quore provides 26 shared features, plus 10 unique tools such as work orders & ticketing, recurring tasks, asset maintenance logs, and notifications. Its built-in productivity tracker and guest messaging enhance operational transparency and accountability.

Overall, Amadeus provides more advanced features for large, multi-layered operations, but Quore’s feature set covers all essentials with added ease of use.

Edge: Amadeus.


Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or Quore?

Customer support is a significant differentiator. Amadeus’ support ratings are low at 1.83/5, with reviews citing slow callbacks, unresolved issues, and poor communication from account managers. Hoteliers describe the help desk as "great," but overall support responsiveness is lacking.

Quore shines with a 4.58/5 support score. Users report prompt, helpful responses, and positive interactions, with reviews stating, "Customer support is excellent and always ready to help." This responsiveness directly translates into smoother onboarding and ongoing operations.

Edge: Quore.


Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or Quore?

Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including industry giants like Revinate, Crave, and Beekeeper, making it suitable for hotels needing extensive third-party integrations. Its open API and broad partnership network enable deep customization and connectivity.

Quore, with only 8 verified partners, still includes essential integrations such as Zingle, Kipsu, and Revinate but offers less extensive connectivity. Its strength lies in the core housekeeping and communication features rather than broad third-party support.

Edge: Amadeus.


Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or Quore?

Recent reviews clearly favor Quore, with an overall rating of 4.59/5 based on 46 reviews, compared to Amadeus’ 4/5 from 3 reviews. Quore’s recent feedback highlights its ease of use, quick support, and feature responsiveness, especially among independent and standard hotels.

Amadeus' limited review count and older feedback make it harder to assess current satisfaction levels. Many users express frustration over support delays, which impacts overall ratings.

Therefore, Quore is the top-rated choice among hoteliers today.

Edge: Quore.


How Much Do Amadeus and Quore Cost?

Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models. They typically operate on custom quotes based on property size and feature requirements. You will need to contact sales teams for detailed pricing estimates.


What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

  • Hotels that operate at a large scale, such as resorts or multi-property groups, needing extensive integrations and automation.
  • Teams that require advanced features like compensation tracking, inspection modules, and multi-language support.
  • Properties with complex operational workflows seeking deep customization via open API.
  • Hotels with existing enterprise systems that need a platform capable of complex coordination.

Not ideal if your hotel needs quick support, simple onboarding, or has limited budget. Smaller properties or those prioritizing ease of use may find Amadeus too complex.


What Type of Hotel Should Use Quore?

  • Mid-sized and independent hotels that value intuitive design and fast support.
  • Properties seeking real-time notifications, task management, and guest interaction tools.
  • Hotels that want to digitize operations without extensive setup or customization.
  • Teams that prefer mobile-first solutions and quick onboarding.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations beyond core housekeeping functions or if you operate at an enterprise scale needing more complex automation.


The Bottom Line for Hotels

Amadeus offers a feature-rich platform with broad integrations suited for large, complex operations that can handle slower support and onboarding processes. Its automation capabilities make it ideal for resorts and multi-property groups focused on efficiency through deep system integration.

Quore excels in user-friendliness, responsiveness, and real-time task management, making it the better choice for hotels prioritizing support and quick adoption. Its high customer satisfaction score and recent reviews confirm its suitability for most mid-sized and independent hotels.

If support quality, ease of use, and a high-rated user experience are your top priorities, Quore is the clear leader. For large, multi-layered operations with complex automation needs, Amadeus remains a strong contender.

In summary, for most hotels today, Quore’s recent positive reviews and support ratings make it the more reliable choice. Consider Amadeus only if your property demands its advanced features and extensive integrations, and you're prepared to manage a steeper learning curve and support challenges.

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的价格是多少?

家政软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 有哪些 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Amadeus Amadeus Quore Quore
双向 PMS 集成
工单和票务
库存趋势分析
延迟退房
开放式 API
开放式 API
检查模块
移动应用
薪酬跟踪
资产维护日志
资本支出预算和预测
重复任务

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Amadeus 对比 Quore:总结

Amadeus
Amadeus
4.9/5 来自 3 条评价

排名更高的方面

欧洲 #14 vs #16

独特功能

延迟退房 开放式 API 薪酬跟踪 双向 PMS 集成 开放式 API
5.0/5 易用性 1.8/5 客户支持 104 个集成
访问官网
Quore
Quore
4.8/5 来自 47 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

任务管理 87% 正面

用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不... 用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不会忘记任务。

跨部门沟通 91% 正面

许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度... 许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度,确保客房部、维护部和前台等部门能够无缝协调。

嘉宾互动 83% 正面

一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意... 一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意度。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

用户界面和体验 50% 负面

虽然许多人认为 Quore 易于使用,但一些评论指出某些功能令人困惑或多余。改进界面可以提升整体用户体验,尤其是对于桌面用户而言。

功能请求和改进 67% 负面

酒店经营者经常提到他们希望增加和改进的功能,例如更频繁的更新、集成库存管理和增强的推送通知。这些建议表明,参与的用户群希望从软件中获得更多价值。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #6 vs #15
中型(25-74 间客房) #7 vs #17
小型(10-24 间客房) #13 vs #16
超大型(200+ 间客房) #7 vs #12

独特功能

资本支出预算和预测 工单和票务 重复任务 移动应用 资产维护日志
4.6/5 易用性 4.6/5 客户支持 8 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Quore 4.6 vs 4.0 (+0.6)
易用性 Amadeus 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)
客户支持 Quore 4.6 vs 1.8 (+2.8)
性价比 Quore 4.4 vs 4.0 (+0.4)
入职培训 Amadeus 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.5)

关于 Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 与 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 的常见问题

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 能否替代 Quore (Cleanings Plus)?

这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 或 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 是否提供免费方案?

Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping:否。Quore (Cleanings Plus):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus)?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,Quore 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息