The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #43 1 条评价 | #30 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 11 条评价 | #26 6 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 19 条评价 | #10 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 19 条评价 | #20 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 23 条评价 | #15 21 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 19 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #35 1 条评价 | #26 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #6 28 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #28 6 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 21 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right revenue management system can significantly impact your hotel’s profitability and operational efficiency. Both Infor EzRMS and LodgIQ aim to optimize pricing strategies through automation and data analysis, but they diverge in maturity, user experience, and market reach. While Infor EzRMS has a longer industry presence, LodgIQ’s recent reviews and higher ratings suggest it might better meet your current needs.
So, which system aligns best with your hotel’s goals and tech environment? Let’s explore the key differences.
Both Infor EzRMS and LodgIQ are designed to automate and enhance revenue strategies, but they serve different hotel profiles. EzRMS, with its extensive feature set and global footprint, caters more to mid-sized and large properties seeking a comprehensive, modular solution. LodgIQ, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use, AI-driven insights, and rapid deployment, appealing to hotels prioritizing agility and modern interfaces.
Recent reviews show LodgIQ’s higher satisfaction ratings and more recent positive feedback, indicating it might be more aligned with hotels looking for intuitive tools and quick ROI. Are you ready to prioritize usability or need a deeply customizable, multi-module platform?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly platform that delivers quick, actionable insights with minimal training, LodgIQ is the clear choice. Its intuitive interface and detailed market data support fast decision-making, ideal for properties that want agility without extensive training.
Choose Infor EzRMS if your hotel requires a broad, modular system capable of managing complex multi-property portfolios with extensive reporting, CRM, and inventory features. It’s suitable for larger chains or independent hotels with dedicated revenue teams that need comprehensive control over their strategies.
LodgIQ’s interface receives a perfect 5/5 rating from users, praised for its clarity, ease of navigation, and visual appeal. Many reviewers highlight how quickly new staff can adopt the system and how seamless the experience is for daily tasks. Customer support is also rated at 4.88/5, reinforcing its user-centric approach.
Infor EzRMS’s ease of use is rated slightly lower at 4.49/5, with some reviews mentioning that understanding its detailed reporting and filters requires specific knowledge. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.27/5, indicating a slightly steeper learning curve.
Edge: LodgIQ.
Infor EzRMS offers 12 exclusive features, including contact management, task automation, and open API, providing a broad set of operational tools. LodgIQ boasts 28 unique features, such as “What-if” scenario analysis, AI optimization, multi-property dashboards, and advanced market insights.
While Infor excels with operational modules, LodgIQ’s focus on analytics, automation, and AI-driven recommendations positions it as the more feature-rich platform for dynamic pricing and market adaptation.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ’s customer support is highly rated at 4.88/5, with reviewers emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Many mention that support team’s rapid responses and proactive communication help resolve issues quickly, keeping the system running smoothly.
Infor’s support scores 4.04/5, with some reviews citing delays and difficulty in troubleshooting complex issues. While still decent, it suggests LodgIQ’s support might be more aligned with hotel teams needing quick, reliable assistance.
Edge: LodgIQ.
Infor EzRMS has verified integrations with 113 partners, including major property management and distribution systems like SiteMinder, Oracle, and RateGain. LodgIQ connects with 25 verified partners, including PMS systems like Stayntouch, RMS, and Cloudbeds.
While Infor’s extensive list indicates broader ecosystem compatibility, LodgIQ’s integrations focus on core revenue and market data tools, possibly reflecting a more streamlined approach.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
LodgIQ’s reviews, totaling 26, all recent, showcase a 5/5 rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Users praise its intuitive interface, stability, and actionable insights, often citing noticeable revenue improvements.
Infor’s 39 reviews, with a less recent focus, rate it at 4.46/5, with some users noting that forecasting and integration issues can hinder performance. Its longer presence attracts larger, more complex properties, but recent satisfaction appears lower.
Edge: LodgIQ.
Both products do not publicly list pricing or trial options, but they operate on custom quotes based on property size, modules, and integration complexity. Generally, larger hotels or chains might face higher costs, but specific prices are unavailable.
Your hotel’s budget and scale will influence the final quote; however, LodgIQ’s focus on rapid deployment and simple licensing may offer more flexible options for smaller or mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, or a modern interface.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly customizable workflows or extensive operational features outside of revenue management.
Core difference:
Infor EzRMS is a broad, feature-rich system designed for larger or complex hotel portfolios, emphasizing operational modules and integrations. LodgIQ offers an AI-driven, easy-to-use platform with a focus on market insights, automation, and rapid deployment.
When to choose EzRMS:
If your hotel needs a deeply customizable, scalable platform with extensive operational features and integrations, EzRMS remains a strong option. It’s suitable for properties with dedicated revenue teams managing multiple brands or properties across regions.
When to choose LodgIQ:
For hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and AI-powered insights for dynamic pricing, LodgIQ is the superior choice. Its high recent ratings and positive reviews recommend it for properties seeking measurable revenue growth and operational simplicity.
Final verdict:
LodgIQ’s recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and modern interface make it the recommended choice for most hotels today. Infor EzRMS remains valuable for large, complex operations but appears less aligned with the evolving needs of smaller or mid-sized properties seeking agility.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
批评意见主要集中在偶尔出现的技术问题上,例如更新缓慢、数据刷新问题和系统延迟。此外,一些评论还强调了客户支持响应时间缓慢,强调需要更快地解决问题以保持... 批评意见主要集中在偶尔出现的技术问题上,例如更新缓慢、数据刷新问题和系统延迟。此外,一些评论还强调了客户支持响应时间缓慢,强调需要更快地解决问题以保持运营效率。
用户经常提到 LodgiQ 的全面数据分析和报告功能。能够有效地比较历史数据和当前数据、查看市场指标并生成详细报告,有助于做出更好的战略规划和运营决策。
许多评论都强调了 LodgiQ 的用户友好界面,该界面使导航和数据分析变得简单。用户欣赏直观的设计和易用性,这有助于简化他们的日常任务并提高效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor EzRMS 和 LodgIQ 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 LodgIQ 提供 25 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LodgIQ 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor EzRMS:否。LodgIQ:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 25,LodgIQ 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问