The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Contact Management/CRM and Fully automated revenue management.
MyForecast 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 "What-if" scenario analysis and Future Market Demand Data.
基于 HTR 上 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 40 | 13 |
在分析了 53 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告功能, 预测支持,而 MyForecast 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
+
预测支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率建议
▾
|
|
|
−
预测准确度
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS 集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #27 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 11 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 19 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 19 条评价 | #37 4 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 23 条评价 | #31 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 19 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #35 1 条评价 | #25 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #22 2 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #28 6 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 21 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor EzRMS and MyForecast RMS hinges on your hotel’s specific revenue management needs. Both systems aim to optimize your pricing strategies and boost profitability, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and regional presence. Infor EzRMS has established itself as a global leader with deep integrations, while MyForecast RMS offers a more streamlined, user-friendly approach with a focus on automation and advanced analytics.
If your team prioritizes a mature, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven performance in large markets, Infor EzRMS might suit you best. Conversely, if you seek a simpler, more intuitive platform with high user satisfaction and a strong focus on automation, MyForecast RMS could be the better choice.
Both products address revenue management, but they approach it differently. Infor EzRMS provides a comprehensive, data-heavy platform with a broad feature set for managing all aspects of hotel pricing, including automation, channel management, and client communication. Its deep learning algorithms help optimize demand forecasts and pricing, making it suitable for large, complex hotel portfolios.
MyForecast RMS, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use, automation, and strategic decision support. Its AI-driven tools, like Price Helper and scenario analysis, facilitate daily adjustments and rapid decision-making, especially for independent hotels and groups seeking straightforward yet powerful tools. Do you need an all-encompassing enterprise system or a more agile, user-friendly solution? The choice depends on your operational complexity.
If your hotel needs a system with extensive integrations, particularly if operating across multiple regions, Infor EzRMS is your pick. It’s especially suited for large hotel chains or properties with complex reporting and automation needs. Its broad feature set, including client management and channel management, supports sophisticated revenue strategies.
If your hotel values simplicity, rapid deployment, and automation, MyForecast RMS fits better. It’s ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, or hotel groups that want a highly intuitive platform with tools like scenario analysis and automated rate adjustments. Budget-conscious properties also benefit from its transparent pricing model.
User experience is a critical factor. Infor EzRMS holds a 4.49/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface but noting a learning curve for complex features. Onboarding can take time, especially for teams unfamiliar with advanced revenue management systems, and some users mention that extracting data requires specific knowledge.
MyForecast RMS boasts a 4.92/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive, streamlined interface and quick onboarding. Users find it easier to perform daily tasks, and high satisfaction ratings reflect its straightforward setup and operation.
Edge: MyForecast RMS.
Infor EzRMS offers a broad range of features—20 exclusive capabilities—including client communication portals, task management, inventory management, automated room-type pricing, and an open API. These features support complex revenue strategies and large-scale operations, making it a comprehensive solution for enterprise-level hotels.
MyForecast RMS provides three unique features—"What-if" scenario analysis, future market demand data, and Price Explanation—that help hotel teams perform strategic adjustments and understand the rationale behind pricing. While its feature set is smaller, these tools are highly valued for their impact on daily decision-making.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS’s support is rated 4.04/5, with users praising their responsiveness but noting that support hours could be expanded for better coverage. Common praise mentions quick problem resolution, but some users report delays following system updates or integration issues.
MyForecast RMS scores a perfect 5/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing the team’s availability, professionalism, and proactive assistance. Customers highlight the responsiveness and personalized service, which helps ensure smooth implementation and ongoing use.
Edge: MyForecast RMS.
Infor EzRMS boasts 113 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Channel Managers like D-Edge. Many integrations are shared, but Infor’s extensive partner network supports large, multi-system environments.
MyForecast RMS has 15 verified partners, including WuBook, Vertical Booking, and hotelcube. While fewer in number, these integrations cover essential booking engines and channel management tools, making it suitable for hotels with more streamlined operational stacks.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS’s 39 reviews average an overall rating of 4.46/5, with some users praising its detailed reporting and broad functionality. However, recent reviews indicate concerns about forecast accuracy and system stability during updates.
MyForecast RMS has 12 reviews, all rating it a perfect 5/5, with comments emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and strategic support. The recent feedback suggests high satisfaction and consistent performance.
Edge: MyForecast RMS.
Infor EzRMS does not publicly list pricing; its implementation fees and licensing are typically customized, reflecting its enterprise scope. Expect higher costs associated with extensive features and integrations.
MyForecast RMS is priced at $1,000 per month, with no apparent setup or implementation fees. Its transparent, subscription-based model offers predictable expenses and better budget control for hotels seeking straightforward pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited operational complexity or budget constraints.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive third-party integrations or operates in a highly complex, multi-region environment.
Core difference: Infor EzRMS is a broad, feature-rich platform suited for large, complex hotel operations. MyForecast RMS is a lightweight, easy-to-use solution focused on automation, analytics, and daily revenue decisions.
When to choose Infor EzRMS: If your hotel needs comprehensive automation, extensive integrations, and detailed reporting, and your team has the capacity to manage a complex system, EzRMS is the clear choice. Its proven track record with major chains supports its suitability for large-scale operations.
When to choose MyForecast RMS: If your hotel seeks a straightforward, highly intuitive system that emphasizes automation, scenario analysis, and rapid implementation, MyForecast RMS offers strong value. Its high user ratings and focused features make it ideal for smaller hotels or groups prioritizing ease of use and quick results.
In conclusion, if your priority is a mature, versatile platform with extensive capabilities, go with Infor EzRMS. If you prefer a streamlined, user-friendly experience with high satisfaction and automated tools, MyForecast RMS delivers a compelling option.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor EzRMS 和 MyForecast RMS 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| “假设”情景分析 | ||
| 价格说明 | ||
| 任务管理(任务和提醒) | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 座位管理 | ||
| 未来市场需求数据 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
| 行程打印输出 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor EzRMS 和 MyForecast RMS 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyForecast RMS 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyForecast RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor EzRMS:否。MyForecast RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 25,MyForecast 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问