The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 83 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Contact Management/CRM and Mobile App.
Rate Yield 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization and Market Insights Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 83 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 40 | 43 |
在分析了 83 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 报告功能, 预测支持, 用户友好界面,而 Rate Yield 用户则强调 客户支持, 收入增加, 节省时间。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
预测支持
▾
|
+
收入增加
▾
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
节省时间
▾
|
|
+
数据分析工具
▾
|
+
仪表板和视觉效果
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率建议
▾
|
−
移动兼容性
▾
|
|
−
预测准确度
▾
|
|
|
−
系统稳定性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #25 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #24 11 条评价 | #14 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 19 条评价 | #11 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 19 条评价 | #16 23 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 23 条评价 | #19 14 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 19 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #35 1 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #5 38 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #28 6 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 21 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Infor EzRMS and Rate Yield hinges on your hotel’s revenue management needs, team expertise, and integration preferences. Both systems aim to optimize your pricing strategies, but they diverge significantly in features, recent performance, and user experience. Infor EzRMS has established itself as a staple in larger, multi-property operations, while Rate Yield is a newer, highly-rated system favored for its simplicity and real-time automation. Which aligns better with your hotel’s scale and sophistication?
Both Infor EzRMS and Rate Yield are designed to maximize revenue through smart pricing strategies. EzRMS boasts broad capabilities, extensive reporting, and a long-standing presence in the industry, but recent reviews indicate a decline in review volume and freshness, with no updates in the last six months. Rate Yield, however, has garnered more recent reviews (five in the last six months), high satisfaction scores, and a clear focus on real-time automation. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Rate Yield currently offers more current insights into user satisfaction.
If your hotel operates multiple properties or requires deep analytics, Infor EzRMS could be more suitable, thanks to its comprehensive modules like group pricing, inventory management, and custom reports. It’s ideal for larger teams that have revenue managers with advanced technical skills and need detailed data insights. Conversely, Rate Yield fits hotels seeking quick, automated rate adjustments and straightforward integration with PMS or channel managers, especially smaller or mid-sized properties without dedicated revenue teams. Its ease of use and automation make it appealing for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity.
Ease of use is a critical factor. Infor EzRMS has an average UI rating of 4.49/5, with reviews noting it’s fairly user-friendly but complex due to its extensive features. New users often require significant onboarding, and some report difficulty navigating advanced functionalities, especially with forecast adjustments. Rate Yield scores a stellar 4.9/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and time-saving automation. Hoteliers consistently praise Rate Yield’s streamlined workflows and responsiveness, especially for users without revenue management backgrounds.
Edge: Rate Yield.
Infor EzRMS offers 18 unique features, including client communication portals, content management, and inventory control—tailored for complex, multi-property management. Rate Yield, with 24 exclusive features, emphasizes real-time rate automation, scenario analysis, market intelligence, and AI-driven insights, all focused on dynamic pricing. Notably, Rate Yield provides functionalities like “what-if” scenario analysis, bulk adjustments, and controlled automation, absent in EzRMS. For advanced, flexible features, Rate Yield holds the edge.
Edge: Rate Yield.
Infor EzRMS is supported by a long-standing company with a support rating of 4.04/5, praised for responsiveness but with some recent feedback about delays and limited regional support. Its customer support is generally helpful, but some users note that support hours could be expanded. Rate Yield, on the other hand, boasts a near-perfect 4.97/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting rapid, attentive, and knowledgeable service. Many users describe the after-sales experience as exceptional, often praising the responsiveness and proactive assistance.
Edge: Rate Yield.
Infor EzRMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Maestro PMS, covering a wide global footprint. Rate Yield, by comparison, connects with only 7 verified partners, primarily PMS and channel managers such as Cloudbeds, Little Hotelier, and Stayntouch. Its integration ecosystem is smaller but sufficient for many mid-sized hotels. If extensive integrations are vital, EzRMS’s larger network offers a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Rating trends reveal that Rate Yield scores higher among hoteliers, especially in recent reviews. It achieves a 9.79/10 NPS score and 97% likelihood to recommend, with rave reviews about its impact on revenue, ease of operation, and customer service. EzRMS, with a 8.67/10 NPS and 86% recommendation rate, still maintains a strong reputation but lacks recent review volume to confirm ongoing satisfaction. Given the recent feedback, Rate Yield currently holds the higher hotelier approval.
Edge: Rate Yield.
Infor EzRMS's pricing details are not publicly listed, but it typically involves enterprise-level quotes, implementation fees, and tiered modules, making it more suitable for larger hotels or chains with bigger budgets. Rate Yield has a clear monthly fee of $500, with no implementation fees or hidden costs, making it more accessible to smaller properties. The transparent, predictable pricing of Rate Yield supports easier budgeting.
Edge: Rate Yield.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff or revenue management expertise, or prefers a straightforward, automated solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs quick deployment or minimal training.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integration with legacy systems or very complex, multi-layered revenue strategies.
Not ideal if your hotel operates a large, complex property portfolio requiring extensive customization.
Infor EzRMS is a solid, well-established revenue management system, offering extensive features and integrations for large, multi-property hotels. Its deep module set supports complex needs, but recent reviews suggest it may lack the same level of current user satisfaction and responsiveness as before.
Rate Yield excels in real-time automation, ease of use, and recent high hotelier ratings, making it an excellent choice for hotels seeking quick, AI-driven revenue optimization without the burden of complex setup or extensive integrations. Its more modern, user-friendly approach suits properties that value operational simplicity and rapid results.
If your hotel needs detailed analytics, extensive customization, and a global presence, Infor EzRMS remains a reliable choice. However, if you prioritize current user satisfaction, fast onboarding, and real-time rate agility, Rate Yield is the clear leader today.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor EzRMS 和 Rate Yield 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| “假设”情景分析 | ||
| 价格说明 | ||
| 任务管理(任务和提醒) | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 团体定价 | ||
| 定义周期 | ||
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 座位管理 | ||
| 管理异常 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM | ||
| 行程打印输出 | ||
| 设置边界 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 30 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RateYield 因其专业、快速且知识渊博的客户支持而获得表彰。评论强调了团队在解决问题、协助集成和提供持续支持方面的响应能力和效率。
众多评论都强调了采用 RateYield 后对收入的直接积极影响。酒店经营者报告称,ADR 和 RevPAR 最大化,市场份额增加,战略性房价调整提高了整体盈利能力。
RateYield 因能够自动调整房价和简化收益管理流程而为酒店经营者节省大量时间而受到称赞。其直观的界面可实现快速入门和轻松导航,从而提高日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户表示 RateYield 需要在移动设备上完全发挥作用。他们提到,目前平板电脑和智能手机上缺少右键点击功能是一个限制因素,如果解决这个问题,将大大提高可... 一些用户表示 RateYield 需要在移动设备上完全发挥作用。他们提到,目前平板电脑和智能手机上缺少右键点击功能是一个限制因素,如果解决这个问题,将大大提高可用性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor EzRMS 和 Rate Yield 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Rate Yield 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Rate Yield 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor EzRMS:否。Rate Yield:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 25,Rate Yield 的为 77。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问