The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #20 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #13 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #32 1 条评价 | #17 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #22 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #23 1 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #11 25 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel CRM and email marketing platform directly impacts your ability to understand your guests, personalize outreach, and boost revenue. Inntopia Marketing Cloud and ReGuest Hotel CRM both aim to enhance these areas, but they diverge significantly in terms of market presence, user feedback, and features. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive support and recent reviews or advanced automation and personalized guest engagement.
Inntopia’s offering is deeply rooted in data integration and broad industry use, but its limited recent reviews and lower support ratings raise questions. ReGuest, however, has a stronger recent review base, higher user satisfaction, and notable AI capabilities for guest communication. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Inntopia Marketing Cloud and ReGuest both tackle guest data management and marketing automation but serve different hotel types and operational goals. Inntopia claims to create a comprehensive, 360-degree view of guests, primarily serving motels and properties in North America and Europe, with a focus on data aggregation. Conversely, ReGuest emphasizes personalized communication, guest segmentation, and AI-driven engagement, catering to a broader range of hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and resorts, mainly in Europe and Asia Pacific.
Inntopia’s reviews are scarce, with only one review in the last six months and a very low NPS score of 3/5, mainly criticizing its support and security. ReGuest, on the other hand, benefits from 27 reviews, 15 of which are recent, with an excellent NPS of 9.7/5 and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Given this, ReGuest’s more active user base and recent positive feedback make it a more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking current support and proven satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a CRM that consolidates guest data across multiple channels and focuses on data accuracy for targeted marketing, Inntopia might seem appealing—though its limited support and outdated reviews caution against it. For hotels prioritizing personalized guest interactions, high email engagement, and AI-powered automation, ReGuest stands out with its intuitive platform, strong user satisfaction, and proven results.
Hoteliers looking for a solution with comprehensive data profiles, especially in North America and Europe, and willing to accept slower support, might lean toward Inntopia. Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, cutting-edge guest communication, and quick onboarding, ReGuest is the safer, more modern choice.
ReGuest’s UI scores a remarkable 4.81/5, with reviews highlighting its clarity, ease of drafting newsletters, and quick results. Users mention how intuitive the design is, with straightforward options for segmentation and automation, making staff adoption simple and efficient.
Inntopia scores 3/5 on ease of use, with reviews citing slow support and cumbersome apps that hinder adoption. Its interface and support experience appear less refined, leading to frustration among users who need quick, reliable access to guest data and marketing tools.
Edge: ReGuest.
Inntopia offers 24 shared features plus three exclusive ones: A/B Testing, Template Importing, and CCPA Compliance. These features support data-driven marketing and legal compliance but are less focused on guest engagement specifics.
ReGuest offers a broader set of 20 verified integrations, including AI features like automated text creation, translation, and guest questions answering. It excels in personalized communication, segmentation, and automation, making it more suited for active guest engagement and marketing campaigns.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s reviews repeatedly praise its support, with a stellar 4.93/5 rating and detailed praise for responsiveness and helpfulness. Users describe it as “patient,” “knowledgeable,” and “reliable,” making onboarding and ongoing use smoother.
Inntopia’s support ratings are notably lower, at just 1/5, with reviews citing slow response times and dissatisfaction with security and technical issues. This discrepancy makes ReGuest the clear leader in customer service.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest boasts 20 verified integrations, including major platforms like Mews, Vertical Booking, and vioma, alongside shared partners like Oracle Hospitality. Inntopia has 13 verified partners, including WebRezPro, SiteMinder, and Revinate, but fewer than ReGuest.
If your hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of third-party integrations, ReGuest provides more options, facilitating better data flow and automation. For hotels with existing systems compatible with Inntopia, the choice might be less clear, but ReGuest’s edge remains significant.
Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s recent reviews highlight high satisfaction levels, with an NPS of 9.7/5 and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various segments, especially boutique and luxury, praise its ease of use, AI features, and support.
Inntopia’s singular review is highly negative, emphasizing its high cost, poor support, and slow apps. Given the limited and outdated review data, ReGuest’s higher ratings and recent feedback clearly position it as the preferred option for most hotels.
Edge: ReGuest.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing, which is typical for enterprise solutions. Inntopia’s pricing is unclear, and it does not offer a free trial or freemium model. ReGuest also lacks transparent pricing but is known to be subscription-based without trial info.
Your hotel will need to contact sales for precise quotes, but ReGuest’s more modern, widely adopted platform suggests a more competitive and flexible pricing structure.
Not ideal if your hotel values rapid support, modern automation, or real-time APIs, given Inntopia’s support shortcomings.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep data aggregation or has complex, existing data infrastructure that ReGuest doesn’t support yet.
The core difference lies in their approach: Inntopia emphasizes data collection and integration, while ReGuest focuses on guest engagement and automation. Inntopia’s limited recent reviews and support issues make it less attractive for hotels seeking reliable, current service.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, user-friendly platform that enhances guest communication and supports AI automation, ReGuest is the clear winner due to its higher user satisfaction, active reviews, and feature set. It’s the better choice for hotels aiming to improve direct bookings and guest experience today.
However, if your hotel requires an extensive, data-centric CRM that integrates with a broad ecosystem of hospitality systems and can justify its cost despite support concerns, Inntopia might still be suitable—but only with careful vetting.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating a modern, well-supported solution with proven recent satisfaction, ReGuest emerges as the superior option. Its strong reviews, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it the sensible choice for your team’s current needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RE:Guest 的客户服务因其乐于助人和响应迅速而屡获好评。客户认为其支持团队耐心且知识渊博,为提升产品整体用户体验做出了积极贡献。
用户称赞 RE:Guest 能够通过其客户关系管理 (CRM) 工具和销售活动功能,创建个性化的客户沟通信息。此功能有助于根据客户的个人偏好定制信息,从而显著提升客户... 用户称赞 RE:Guest 能够通过其客户关系管理 (CRM) 工具和销售活动功能,创建个性化的客户沟通信息。此功能有助于根据客户的个人偏好定制信息,从而显著提升客户体验。
将个性化聊天机器人集成到 RE:Guest 系统中获得了积极评价,用户注意到客户满意度有所提升,运营流程也更加有序。该工具在提升客户体验方面的作用得到了证实。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
现有界面受到一些批评,部分用户认为其复杂且需要改进,尤其是在设置和信息文本管理方面。用户建议改进界面,以简化导航和繁琐的设置调整。
部分用户希望与第三方系统(例如 Vioma Clearing)进行更深入的集成。这种集成对于实现全面的数据可视化和提高运营效率至关重要。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Inntopia Marketing Cloud 和 ReGuest Hotel CRM 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Inntopia Marketing Cloud 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ReGuest Hotel CRM 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ReGuest Hotel CRM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Inntopia Marketing Cloud:否。ReGuest Hotel CRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Inntopia 的 HT Score 为 0,Reguest 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案