The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #5 4 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 18 条评价 | #9 9 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #5 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #9 7 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 12 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 8 条评价 | #9 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | #8 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | #7 9 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #5 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between IVvy by IVvy and Matrix SMS by M1 Intel requires understanding how each software tackles hotel sales management, what specific needs they address, and which aligns best with your team’s workflows. IVvy is an established platform with a focus on venue booking, event management, and integrated client communication. Conversely, Matrix SMS is a newer, leaner sales CRM built specifically for hotel sales teams seeking speed and data control.
The core distinction is IVvy’s comprehensive event-centric tools versus Matrix’s streamlined sales pipeline management. If your hotel emphasizes event booking alongside sales, IVvy’s features support that. If your team needs a focused sales system with visibility across multiple properties, Matrix’s design may serve you better. Which product aligns with your primary operational focus?
IVvy’s 31 reviews, with 3 in the last six months, and an overall rating of 4.75/5 reflect a mature, well-supported platform with ongoing improvements. M1 Intel’s 18 reviews, all older and with a 0/5 rating, suggest limited market presence and unverified user satisfaction. Given the more recent feedback and higher review count, IVvy clearly holds a stronger position for hoteliers evaluating sales solutions.
While M1 Intel offers a high ease-of-use rating (4.94/5), its lack of verified reviews and integrations diminishes confidence. If recent user experience and proven functionality matter most, IVvy is the safer bet. Are you comfortable relying on a newer system with limited feedback, or do you prefer a proven, reviewed platform?
IVvy is tailored for hotels and venues that need an all-in-one event and booking management system with sales functionalities. Its features like contract management, e-signatures, and payment processing suit large-scale or multi-event hotels that require automation and integration with property management systems.
M1 Intel targets hotel sales teams that prioritize pipeline visibility and deal tracking across multiple properties. Its simple, clean interface and real-time reporting are ideal for hotel groups seeking high-level sales oversight without extensive event management tools. If your hotel relies heavily on events, IVvy’s end-to-end solutions are preferable. If you want sharp sales oversight with minimal fuss, M1 Intel may fit.
IVvy boasts a 4.69/5 ease-of-use rating based on user reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding is rated 4.44/5, with many users citing quick adoption and helpful training resources. However, some find its reporting complex, and a few suggest simplifying certain workflows.
M1 Intel scores even higher at 4.94/5, with users praising its minimal bloat and streamlined execution. Its modern, clean interface makes managing leads and deals straightforward, and onboarding is rated 5/5 with positive feedback on ease of setup. Overall, M1 Intel’s design favors quick mastery, especially for sales professionals.
Edge: M1 Intel
IVvy offers 11 features, including contract management, e-signatures, and invoicing, which are absent in M1 Intel. Its ability to generate and manage proposals, handle payments, and automate reporting makes it suitable for comprehensive event and sales workflows.
M1 Intel provides 9 core sales management features, with specialties like deep search, Kanban boards, and real-time deal tracking. Its standout feature, the Chain Dashboard, offers unique visibility into multiple properties, but overall, IVvy’s broader feature set makes it more versatile for diverse hotel needs.
Edge: IVvy
IVvy’s support team receives a 4.73/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick responses and personalized service. Many users appreciate the ongoing upgrades driven by customer feedback, which enhances the platform’s usability.
M1 Intel’s support is rated even higher at 4.89/5, with reviewers describing the team as responsive and open to feedback. However, its limited user base and fewer recent reviews make IVvy’s established support network more trustworthy for hotel teams seeking reliable assistance.
Edge: M1 Intel
IVvy integrates with over 55 third-party systems, including industry leaders like Opera, SevenRooms, and RMS, allowing seamless connection with existing hotel tech stacks. This extensive integration ecosystem reduces manual work and enhances operational consistency.
M1 Intel offers no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. This absence restricts hotel teams from automating workflows or syncing data across platforms. For hotels relying on multiple systems, IVvy’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: IVvy
IVvy’s reviews, with an average 4.75/5, come from a diverse hotel segment base, including luxury, resorts, and boutique hotels. Its recent reviews reinforce high satisfaction, especially in automating administrative tasks and improving client communication.
M1 Intel’s reviews are older, with no verified ratings or recent feedback, and the existing reviews do not provide detailed insights into user satisfaction. Given the recent positive feedback for IVvy, it is the stronger-rated option among hoteliers.
Edge: IVvy
IVvy’s base price is $300 per month, with no free trial or hidden fees. Its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs without additional implementation charges.
M1 Intel’s base price is $400 per month, also without a trial or extra fees. Although slightly more expensive, its pricing reflects its niche focus on sales pipeline management without added event features.
IVvy offers a broad, mature platform with extensive features, integrations, and recent positive reviews. It suits hotels that require full event management, automated workflows, and a proven support system. Its higher review count and recent feedback make it the recommended choice for most hotel sales teams.
Matrix SMS, while easier to master and highly rated for usability, has a limited feature set and no verified integrations. It might appeal to small, straightforward sales teams in hotels prioritizing speed over complex workflows.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one event and sales management platform with proven functionality, IVvy remains the clear choice. For streamlined, high-speed sales tracking with minimal bells and whistles, M1 Intel could be suitable—but with less confidence due to fewer reviews and less proven market presence.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Everyone in the conference department can make a quote for a customer. Nobody has to check with a manager; everyone can send an offer to the customer. The customer can look at the..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
IVvy 一直因其易于导航的界面而受到称赞,它简化了事件管理并减少了员工培训时间。
虽然这并非 IVvy 独有的,但许多评论都强调了其出色的客户支持,包括快速的响应时间和支持人员的高可用性。
用户欣赏 IVvy 的广泛定制选项,这使他们能够定制活动菜单、场地信息和销售报告,从而使平台能够高度适应特定需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台提供全面的报告功能,但一些用户发现报告功能过于复杂,希望有更多用户友好的选项。
一些用户寻求更深入的教程和功能,以利用 IVvy 进行战略营销活动,包括电子邮件营销和 SEO 优化。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。IVvy 和 Matrix SMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Sales Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。IVvy 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Matrix SMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Matrix SMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
IVvy:否。Matrix SMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Sales Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。IVvy 的 HT Score 为 75,M1 Intel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问