Jaras vs. Redforts: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 15, 2026  ·  已分析 43 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Jaras 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.

Redforts 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Jaras 与 Redforts 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
73
推荐可能性
0%
95%
易用性
0.0/5
4.7/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.6/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $1,000/mo From $500/mo
经验证的评价 0 43

Jaras 与 Redforts 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,Jaras 用户最看重其 ,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
优点
+ 易于使用且直观的系统
+ 预订管理
+ 客户服务
+ 持续改进和创新
缺点
集成功能
界面和设计改进

Jaras 对比 Redforts:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
小型(10-24 间客房) #31 21 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #49 3 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
精品酒店 #30 18 条评价
豪华酒店 #39 5 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #49 2 条评价
长住酒店 #37 2 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
北美 #32 4 条评价
欧洲 #14 39 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for streamlining your hotel operations, maximizing revenue, and improving guest experiences. Both Jaras by Jaras and Redforts by Redforts aim to tackle these challenges, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. Jaras is a new, cloud-native platform with no reviews yet, while Redforts boasts 40 reviews, mostly recent, with a clear track record of customer satisfaction. With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, Redforts currently offers a more dependable choice.

Are you looking for a modern, scalable PMS with extensive integrations and proven user satisfaction, or do you prefer a solution still gaining traction in the market? The answer depends on your operational needs and confidence in newer versus established platforms.

Is Jaras or Redforts Better for Hotels?

Jaras aims to be an all-in-one platform that centralizes reservations, financial workflows, and distribution through a cloud-native interface. However, as a new entrant founded in 2023 with zero reviews, its market presence is limited, and user confidence is untested. Redforts, founded in 2010 and with 40 recent reviews, demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction, particularly around ease of use and support.

If your hotel values a well-established vendor with a proven track record, Redforts is the safer choice. Conversely, if you are eager to adopt a modern, potentially more flexible system and are comfortable with a platform that still needs validation, Jaras might be worth exploring in the future. Do you prioritize reliability or innovation?

Redforts vs Jaras: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a mature, reliable platform with strong customer support and extensive features, go with Redforts. It offers a full suite of tools—including channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, online check-in, and payment integration—supported by a solid review base and recent positive feedback.

If, however, your team is looking for a cloud-native system with a focus on automation, reservation management, and scalable operations, Jaras could be appealing once it gains more traction and reviews. For now, Redforts’ extensive feature count and proven performance make it the more dependable option for most hotels.

Is Jaras or Redforts Easier to Use?

Redforts excels in ease of use, with a 4.68/5 rating derived from 40 recent reviews, and a user-friendly interface that simplifies daily operations. Reviewers highlight its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and helpful customer support, making it accessible even for small teams.

Jaras, on the other hand, has no ratings or reviews to verify its usability or user experience, making it impossible to assess whether it is easier to adopt. Given the current data, Edge: Redforts.

Which Has Better Features: Jaras or Redforts?

Redforts boasts 31 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency support, guest communication via SMS and email marketing, integrated payment processing, real-time reporting, and a mobile app. These features support comprehensive management and automation, adding significant value.

Jaras offers only 1 unique feature—being on-premise—while sharing 15 features with Redforts, but it lacks the broad feature set and automation tools present in Redforts. Its cloud-native design suggests scalability, but without detailed features list or user feedback, Redforts clearly leads here. Edge: Redforts.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Jaras or Redforts?

Redforts’ support is highly rated at 4.53/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Review snippets emphasize quick resolutions and attentive service, fostering confidence in ongoing support.

Jaras has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given the robust, recent feedback for Redforts, Edge: Redforts.

Which Has More Integrations: Jaras or Redforts?

Redforts offers integration with two verified partners—Mr Winston and WuBook—focusing on channel management. In contrast, Jaras does not have verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity options at present.

While Jaras’s lack of integrations might restrict its adaptability, Redforts provides basic channel management and booking engine integrations, enhancing operational flexibility. Edge: Redforts.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Jaras or Redforts?

Since Jaras has no reviews, it currently cannot be rated. Redforts, with 40 recent reviews, enjoys a 95% likelihood to recommend among users across various hotel types, including boutique hotels and hostels.

Reviewers particularly appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature richness, leading to high satisfaction levels. For now, Redforts is the clear favorite in user ratings. Edge: Redforts.

How Much Do Jaras and Redforts Cost?

Jaras is priced at a $1,000 base fee with no mention of ongoing charges or trial options, which may suggest a higher upfront investment. Redforts charges $500 initially, with no monthly fees or implementation costs, offering a more cost-efficient solution.

Because Redforts’s pricing is straightforward and lower in initial cost, it presents better affordability—especially for smaller properties or those seeking a predictable expense structure.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Jaras?

  • Hotels seeking a cloud-native, centralized management solution.
  • Properties with tech-savvy teams willing to adopt a newer platform.
  • Operations that prioritize automation and real-time reporting.
  • Hotels planning to scale with integrated distribution channels.

Not ideal if your hotel requires proven stability, extensive integrations, or prefers a mature vendor with a long track record. Larger properties or those with complex needs may find Jaras’s limited features and untested support a challenge.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Redforts?

  • Hotels, hostels, and B&Bs looking for an easy-to-use, all-in-one PMS.
  • Properties with limited IT resources desiring reliable support.
  • Hotels that value established market presence and proven customer satisfaction.
  • Small to medium hotels wanting extensive features like online check-in, guest communication, and integrated revenue management.

Not ideal if your hotel needs highly customizable or industry-specific features not listed, or if you prefer a cloud-native system over a traditional, on-premise solution.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Jaras presents a modern, scalable property management platform with potential, but it currently lacks reviews and proven user feedback. Its on-premise capability and cloud-native focus could serve innovative hotels well once it matures, but for now, it's untested in the market.

Redforts, with over a decade in the field and 40 recent reviews, demonstrates consistent reliability, ease of use, and a comprehensive feature set. If you prioritize confidence, customer support, and proven performance, Redforts is the clear choice.

Choose Jaras if you are comfortable with a newer platform that promises scalability and integration, and you’re prepared to evaluate its performance as it develops. Opt for Redforts if your priority is stability, extensive features, and a track record of satisfied users. For most hotels seeking a dependable, well-supported solution today, Redforts remains the recommended option.

Jaras 和 Redforts 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
Starting Price From $1,000/mo From $500/mo

Jaras 有哪些 Redforts 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Jaras 和 Redforts 共享 15 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Jaras Jaras Redforts Redforts
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
原生电子邮件营销
在前提
多币种
客户关系管理
礼品卡
访客通信(短信)

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 20 项功能存在差异。

Jaras 对比 Redforts:总结

Jaras
Jaras
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

在前提
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
Redforts
Redforts
4.8/5 来自 43 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用且直观的系统 93% 正面

许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。

预订管理 61% 正面

该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。

客户服务 100% 正面

细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成功能 50% 负面

Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。

界面和设计改进 75% 负面

虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。

独特功能

多币种 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) 访客通信(短信) 原生电子邮件营销 客户关系管理
4.7/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 2 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 Redforts 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
客户支持 Redforts 4.5 vs 0.0 (+4.5)
性价比 Redforts 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
入职培训 Redforts 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)

关于 Jaras 与 Redforts 的常见问题

Jaras 能否替代 Redforts?

这取决于您的需求。Jaras 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Jaras 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Jaras 或 Redforts 是否提供免费方案?

Jaras:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Jaras 和 Redforts?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Jaras 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息