The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 44 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LodgIQ 表现出色 在 技术问题和支持响应 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Fully automated revenue management and Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization.
MyForecast 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Open Pricing and Smart Spreading Technology.
基于 HTR 上 44 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 31 | 13 |
在分析了 44 条经验证的评价后,LodgIQ 用户最看重其 技术问题和支持响应, 数据分析和报告, 用户友好界面,而 MyForecast 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
技术问题和支持响应
▾
|
|
|
+
数据分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #30 3 条评价 | #27 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #26 6 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 7 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #20 18 条评价 | #37 4 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 21 条评价 | #31 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 17 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #26 2 条评价 | #25 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 28 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between LodgIQ by LodgIQ and MyForecast RMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity. Both systems aim to optimize revenue through automation and data-driven insights, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. LodgIQ, with its more extensive feature set and larger review base, offers a comprehensive AI-powered solution suited for more complex or larger hotels. MyForecast, however, provides a leaner, user-friendly interface ideal for smaller hotels or groups seeking straightforward automation.
Are you ready to dive into the key differences to determine which platform aligns best with your hotel’s strategy?
Both LodgIQ and MyForecast serve the core purpose of revenue management, but they approach it differently. LodgIQ uses advanced AI and machine learning to deliver highly detailed, adaptive forecasts, supported by a broad suite of features like channel management, market intelligence, and automation tools. Conversely, MyForecast emphasizes guided procedures, business intelligence, and automation with a focus on simplifying revenue management for hotels of all sizes.
LodgIQ’s platform is more robust, with a higher review count (26 reviews versus 12 for MyForecast), and recent reviews indicating stronger confidence in its capabilities. Its more extensive feature list includes automated room-type pricing, 365-day forward pricing, and open API integrations, making it suitable for hotels with complex revenue management needs. MyForecast’s strengths lie in its ease of use, clear automation, and competitive price point, appealing to hotels and groups needing reliable automation without complexity.
Given the data, LodgIQ is the more proven and comprehensive choice, but your decision depends on whether your team prefers advanced customization or straightforward automation. Would you prioritize detailed AI-driven insights or ease of implementation?
If your hotel needs a highly detailed, AI-powered revenue management platform capable of handling complex property portfolios with extensive automation, go with LodgIQ. Its features like multi-property dashboards, market insights, and automated pricing updates are designed for hotels that require sophisticated, adaptive strategies.
If your hotel or group prefers a straightforward, intuitive system with guided procedures and automation tailored to operational simplicity, MyForecast is the better fit. It’s ideal for independent hotels, smaller groups, or those new to revenue management automation, offering reliable tools like dynamic price prediction and rate analysis without the complexity.
For hotels seeking advanced AI and detailed customization, LodgIQ’s larger feature set and proven market presence make it the preferred choice. Conversely, for hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and cost-effective automation, MyForecast is the safer bet.
LodgIQ scores 4.67 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive, visually appealing interface that simplifies complex data analysis. Its onboarding process is rated 4.59, with some reviews mentioning occasional slow data loading and minor navigation issues, but support is generally responsive.
MyForecast slightly outperforms LodgIQ with a 4.92 rating, thanks to its straightforward guided procedures and automation features. Users find it highly intuitive and effective for daily revenue tasks, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly design and efficient customer support.
Edge: MyForecast.
LodgIQ offers a significantly larger suite of features—36 exclusive functionalities including fully automated revenue management, channel manager integration, 365-day forward pricing, market intelligence data, AI optimization, and customizable dashboards. It also provides tools for managing exceptions, group pricing, and detailed market insights, making it suitable for operationally complex hotels.
MyForecast provides three unique features only in its package: open pricing, smart spreading technology, and a price explanation tool. While these are valuable, they do not match the breadth of LodgIQ’s capabilities.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ’s support rating is 4.88 out of 5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, although some mention delays when technical issues arise. LodgIQ’s support team is known for being supportive and proactive, but occasional slow responses are noted.
MyForecast scores a perfect 5 out of 5 in support, with reviews highlighting the team’s efficiency, availability, and user-friendly assistance. Many users appreciate the quick resolution times and personalized guidance.
Edge: MyForecast.
LodgIQ boasts 25 verified integration partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Lighthouse, and property management systems like RMS and Mews. It also offers an open API, broadening its connectivity options for complex hotel setups.
MyForecast has 15 verified partners, including popular tools like WuBook, Vertical Booking, and hotelcube, but fewer integrations than LodgIQ. Shared partners include SiteMinder and Oracle Hospitality, but LodgIQ’s wider ecosystem supports more extensive customization.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ has received 26 reviews, all recent, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 9.58/10 NPS score, indicating high satisfaction. Hotels in the luxury and city-center segments particularly rate LodgIQ highly, appreciating its advanced features and user interface.
MyForecast has 12 reviews, also recent, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a 9.67/10 NPS score. Its user-friendly approach appeals strongly to independent hotels and smaller groups, especially those valuing automation and simplicity.
Given the more extensive review base and higher overall rating, LodgIQ is the more highly-rated system by hoteliers.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but it’s known that implementation costs are generally higher for comprehensive enterprise features. Its subscription model is typically tailored, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
MyForecast charges a base price of $1,000 monthly, with no additional implementation fees or freemium options. Its transparent pricing is favorable for hotels seeking predictable costs.
In summary, LodgIQ’s cost may be justified by its extensive features, while MyForecast provides a straightforward, predictable pricing structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
LodgIQ is a comprehensive, AI-driven revenue management platform designed for hotels with complex needs and larger portfolios. It offers a broad feature set, top-tier integrations, and a proven track record, making it ideal if you seek depth, automation, and market intelligence.
MyForecast provides a simpler, more accessible solution focused on automation, guided procedures, and straightforward analytics, perfect for smaller hotels or groups demanding quick setup and ease of use.
Choose LodgIQ if your hotel needs advanced customization, detailed market insights, and multi-property management. Opt for MyForecast if ease of use, automation, and predictable costs are higher priorities.
In conclusion, LodgIQ is the more comprehensive and better-rated option backed by recent reviews and a higher review count. However, if your hotel values simplicity and affordability, MyForecast remains a strong choice.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,LodgIQ 和 MyForecast RMS 共享 12 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 价格说明 | ||
| 全自动收益管理 | ||
| 公开定价 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 单点登录 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 智能撒播技术 | ||
| 自动房间类型定价 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 27 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
批评意见主要集中在偶尔出现的技术问题上,例如更新缓慢、数据刷新问题和系统延迟。此外,一些评论还强调了客户支持响应时间缓慢,强调需要更快地解决问题以保持... 批评意见主要集中在偶尔出现的技术问题上,例如更新缓慢、数据刷新问题和系统延迟。此外,一些评论还强调了客户支持响应时间缓慢,强调需要更快地解决问题以保持运营效率。
用户经常提到 LodgiQ 的全面数据分析和报告功能。能够有效地比较历史数据和当前数据、查看市场指标并生成详细报告,有助于做出更好的战略规划和运营决策。
许多评论都强调了 LodgiQ 的用户友好界面,该界面使导航和数据分析变得简单。用户欣赏直观的设计和易用性,这有助于简化他们的日常任务并提高效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。LodgIQ 和 MyForecast RMS 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。LodgIQ 提供 25 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyForecast RMS 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyForecast RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
LodgIQ:否。MyForecast RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LodgIQ 的 HT Score 为 70,MyForecast 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问