The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Lodgistics 表现出色 在 改善内部沟通 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Access.
Quore 表现出色 在 任务管理 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Mobile access on any device.
基于 HTR 上 108 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 61 | 47 |
在分析了 108 条经验证的评价后,Lodgistics 用户最看重其 改善内部沟通, 维修及家政管理, 用户体验和培训,而 Quore 用户则强调 任务管理, 跨部门沟通, 嘉宾互动。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
改善内部沟通
▾
|
+
任务管理
▾
|
|
+
维修及家政管理
▾
|
+
跨部门沟通
▾
|
|
+
用户体验和培训
▾
|
+
嘉宾互动
▾
|
|
+
可定制性和集成
▾
|
+
培训资源
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
小错误和软件问题
▾
|
−
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
−
功能请求和改进
▾
|
|
|
−
应用程序性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #17 0 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 54 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #11 3 条评价 | #6 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 0 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 13 条评价 | #7 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #14 8 条评价 | #8 12 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 52 条评价 | #5 41 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 12 条评价 | #5 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 57 条评价 | #2 42 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #16 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #15 0 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Lodgistics Housekeeping by Lodgistics and Quore (Cleanings Plus) by Quore hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both products aim to streamline housekeeping and maintenance, but Lodgistics offers a more integrated approach focused on internal communication, whereas Quore emphasizes real-time task management and guest interaction. Which software aligns better with your hotel’s scale, tech infrastructure, and team workflows?
Lodgistics excels in operational integration and ease of communication, while Quore provides a broader feature set for task automation and guest engagement. Your decision should consider your hotel’s size, segment, and staff capabilities. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?
Lodgistics and Quore both target hotel housekeeping efficiency, but their core strengths differ. Lodgistics is designed to unify internal communication across departments, replacing paper-based systems with electronic work orders and messaging. Quore, on the other hand, automates cleaning tasks with instant notifications and performance tracking, enhancing real-time responsiveness.
Furthermore, Lodgistics has a simpler focus on operational workflows, with a total of 15 shared and exclusive features, emphasizing communication tools like chat and multi-language support. Quore offers a wider array of features—up to 25 exclusive modules—such as asset maintenance logs and inventory analysis, to support broader hotel operations.
Lodgistics has a higher overall rating of 4.75/5 with 54 reviews, including recent feedback, versus Quore’s 4.59/5 from 46 reviews, but Quore's recent reviews are fewer. Does your hotel prioritize internal communication or extensive task automation? The choice depends on your operational priorities.
If your hotel needs to improve department communication, streamline work order management, and minimize manual errors, Lodgistics is the clear choice. Its ease of use (rated 4.71/5) and high user satisfaction—97% likelihood to recommend—make it suited for properties seeking simplicity and reliable internal messaging.
In contrast, if your team requires detailed task tracking, automation of recurring tasks, and guest interaction tools, Quore’s 25 unique features and robust reporting capabilities make it more suitable. Quore’s focus on real-time notifications and performance monitoring will benefit hotels aiming for dynamic, guest-focused operations.
Lodgistics appeals to properties that prioritize internal operational flow, especially with its strong housekeeping and maintenance modules. Quore suits hotels looking to elevate guest satisfaction through efficient task completion, guest messaging, and asset management. Your hotel’s scale, tech savviness, and guest service goals should guide your choice.
Lodgistics scores a 4.71/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. Users praise its straightforward navigation, which minimizes training time, although some mention bugs and mobile app performance issues. Its mobile access is rated positively, but occasional slowdowns are noted.
Quore’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.6/5 but still highly rated. Users find its interface generally user-friendly, with a few reports of confusing functions and redundant features. The platform’s mobile app is functional but sometimes crashes, impacting workflow.
Edge: Lodgistics. Its higher ease-of-use rating and recent reviews indicate a smoother learning curve and better staff adoption.
Lodgistics offers 15 core features, including chat, mobile access, multi-language support, and inspection modules—focusing on internal communication and basic operational management. Quore packs 25 features, such as work orders, inventory analysis, preventive maintenance, deep cleaning, and real-time task tracking, supporting broader hotel operations.
Unique features in Lodgistics include chat, multi-language UI, and inspections—helpful for hotels needing simple communication tools. Quore’s exclusive modules like CapEX budgeting, service escalation, and deep cleaning enable more comprehensive hotel management.
Edge: Quore. Its larger feature set, especially in task automation and asset management, provides a more versatile toolkit for diverse hotel needs.
Lodgistics scores slightly higher in support ratings at 4.69/5, with users appreciating quick response times and ongoing feedback incorporation. Clients commend Nadiah’s team for attentive service, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Quore’s support rating is 4.58/5; users mention helpfulness but note occasional delays and a desire for more extensive training resources. Some users report app crashes that could be mitigated with better support and updates.
Edge: Lodgistics. The slightly higher rating and recent positive feedback attest to more responsive support.
Lodgistics integrates with 3 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and HotelKey—primarily focusing on core property systems. Quore boasts 8 verified partners, such as Revinate, Kipsu, and Canary Technologies, covering guest messaging, reputation management, and inventory.
Shared integrations are limited, but Quore’s broader ecosystem facilitates more extensive third-party connections, which can streamline multi-system workflows.
Edge: Quore. Its wider array of integrations offers more flexibility for hotels leveraging diverse tech solutions.
Lodgistics is rated 4.75/5 based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use and operational impact. Hotels in various segments, especially branded properties, rate it highly—many noting improved internal communication and work order management.
Quore’s rating is 4.59/5 from 46 reviews, with positive comments on task automation and guest messaging. However, recent reviews are scarce, making Lodgistics the more current and trusted choice.
Edge: Lodgistics. Its higher rating and more recent reviews provide stronger validation.
Both Lodgistics and Quore do not publicly list specific pricing models, but neither offers a freemium plan or trial. Cost likely depends on property size, modules selected, and integrations, so contacting sales for a custom quote is advisable.
If budget considerations are critical, be prepared for a tailored quote based on your hotel’s operational scope.
Not ideal if you need extensive guest-facing features or advanced asset management beyond basic maintenance.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal housekeeping needs or prefers simple, communication-only tools.
Lodgistics offers a highly rated, easy-to-use platform with a strong focus on internal communication and operational streamlining. Its recent reviews and high overall score make it suitable for properties that want reliable, straightforward housekeeper and maintenance management.
Quore provides a broader set of features, including guest messaging, asset management, and extensive automation options, making it ideal for hotels needing comprehensive, real-time task execution and guest engagement tools.
If your hotel’s primary goal is internal communication and workflow efficiency, Lodgistics is the safer bet. For larger properties or those seeking a more feature-rich, automation-heavy system, Quore’s flexibility and broader integrations could justify the investment.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a proven, highly-rated housekeeping management solution, Lodgistics is the better choice, especially given its recent positive reviews and higher overall rating. However, if your team requires a multifunctional platform that covers more operational bases, Quore’s extensive capabilities make it worth considering.
家政软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Lodgistics Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享 11 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多语言用户界面支持 | ||
| 工单和票务 | ||
| 库存趋势分析 | ||
| 检查模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动访问 | ||
| 聊天 | ||
| 资产维护日志 | ||
| 资本支出预算和预测 | ||
| 重复任务 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Lodgistics 因其能够加强各部门之间的沟通、促进员工之间顺畅高效的互动而受到广泛赞誉。它支持各种沟通方式,包括工作订单、客户请求和实时更新,从而提高了员... Lodgistics 因其能够加强各部门之间的沟通、促进员工之间顺畅高效的互动而受到广泛赞誉。它支持各种沟通方式,包括工作订单、客户请求和实时更新,从而提高了员工协调能力和客户满意度。该工具还支持多种语言,尽管有些用户希望有更多语言选项。
该软件的维护和客房服务模块因其全面性和易用性而获得高度评价。用户对跟踪和管理工作订单以及输入和监控预防性维护的能力表示赞赏,这简化了酒店运营并减少了客... 该软件的维护和客房服务模块因其全面性和易用性而获得高度评价。用户对跟踪和管理工作订单以及输入和监控预防性维护的能力表示赞赏,这简化了酒店运营并减少了客人投诉的发生率。客房服务功能因其简单性而受到称赞,即使对于不太懂技术的员工来说也是如此,并且它对运营效率有积极影响。
Lodgistics 的直观界面大大减少了员工的培训时间,让新员工和现有员工都能轻松上手。此外,用户发现该平台易于导航,有助于提高各部门的采用率和有效使用率。然... Lodgistics 的直观界面大大减少了员工的培训时间,让新员工和现有员工都能轻松上手。此外,用户发现该平台易于导航,有助于提高各部门的采用率和有效使用率。然而,有些人遇到了一些小错误,希望移动应用程序能有更好的性能。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上用户对软件感到满意,但一些用户也报告了一些小的软件错误,尤其是移动应用程序,包括保存编辑和设备间同步的问题。虽然这些错误并不严重,但已指出可... 虽然总体上用户对软件感到满意,但一些用户也报告了一些小的软件错误,尤其是移动应用程序,包括保存编辑和设备间同步的问题。虽然这些错误并不严重,但已指出可以进行改进以提升整体用户体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不... 用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不会忘记任务。
许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度... 许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度,确保客房部、维护部和前台等部门能够无缝协调。
一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意... 一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人认为 Quore 易于使用,但一些评论指出某些功能令人困惑或多余。改进界面可以提升整体用户体验,尤其是对于桌面用户而言。
酒店经营者经常提到他们希望增加和改进的功能,例如更频繁的更新、集成库存管理和增强的推送通知。这些建议表明,参与的用户群希望从软件中获得更多价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Lodgistics Housekeeping 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lodgistics Housekeeping 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Lodgistics Housekeeping 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lodgistics Housekeeping:否。Quore (Cleanings Plus):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Lodgistics 的 HT Score 为 78,Quore 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问