The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 Zavia ERP 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
You're evaluating two property management systems: Mews PMS by Mews and Zavia ERP by Zavia ERP. Both aim to streamline hotel operations but approach the problem differently. Mews, with its extensive global presence and a large user base, offers a broad feature set and a proven track record. Zavia ERP, by contrast, is tailored for smaller and mid-sized hotels in Latin America, emphasizing affordability and localized support. Which system fits your hotel’s specific needs better?
Mews’s strengths lie in its depth of features, broad integrations, and user satisfaction, supported by over 750 recent reviews. Zavia ERP’s niche focus and competitive pricing appeal more to smaller hotels in Latin America. Can Zavia meet your operational complexity, or does Mews’s scale and robustness provide the security you need?
Mews and Zavia ERP both serve hotel operations but differ markedly in their approach and market focus. Mews addresses a diverse range of hotel types — from boutique to large chains — with a cloud-native platform that emphasizes automation, integrations, and guest experience. Zavia ERP primarily targets smaller hotels and boutique properties in Latin America, offering a simplified, localized solution.
While Mews supports multi-property management, extensive third-party integrations, and automation, Zavia focuses on core reservation management, real-time rate sync with over 40 agencies, and website creation without programming. Do you need a flexible, globally proven system, or a straightforward tool built for your regional market?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with integrations to support complex operations, go with Mews. Its vast ecosystem of over 1,000 integrations, high user ratings (4.62/5 from 758 reviews), and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
If your hotel is smaller, operates mainly within Latin America, and prioritizes cost-effective control over operations, Zavia ERP is appropriate. At a significantly lower base price ($300 vs $900), it offers reservation management, real-time OTA rate sync, and native website creation, ideal for hotels under 200 rooms seeking simplicity.
Mews’s interface consistently earns a 4.7/5 user rating, praised for its modern, intuitive design and ease of onboarding, even for staff unfamiliar with PMS technology. Its cloud platform allows remote management, and many reviews highlight its straightforward setup and minimal training needs.
Zavia ERP’s user experience is less documented, but its localized design and support indicate a focus on usability for smaller hotels in Latin America. However, lacking extensive review data, it’s presumed less feature-heavy and might require more hands-on training for regional staff.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 51 core features, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, guest CRM, integrated CRS, automated reminders, and SOC2 compliance — all absent in Zavia. Its unique features enable complex revenue management, automation, and guest personalization, making it suitable for a variety of hotel types.
Zavia provides essential reservation management, OTA rate synchronization, and website creation, but lacks advanced features like guest CRM or automation tools. If your hotel demands sophisticated operations, Mews’s broader feature set is the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support is rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive problem-solving. Hoteliers mention that support teams are helpful, though some note occasional bugs, which are swiftly addressed.
Zavia ERP, with no available review data, likely offers localized support tailored to Latin American markets, but the lack of widespread feedback means you cannot confidently assess response quality or resolution speed.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, supporting extensive customization. Shared integrations with platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Profitroom make Mews highly adaptable.
Zavia ERP has only 5 verified partners, mainly focusing on booking engines and payment gateways, limiting integration options. For hotels needing a flexible, connected tech environment, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews indicates strong, recent positive feedback, especially from boutique, independent, and city-center hotels. Hotels of various sizes in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific rate it highly, with many praising its ease of use and automation.
Zavia ERP has no available ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction confidently. Given the volume and recency of Mews reviews, it’s the more trusted option by hoteliers.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month with no trial or implementation fees, positioning it as a premium solution. Zavia ERP’s base price is $300 per month, with no mention of additional costs, appealing to hotels with limited budgets.
Your choice depends on your operational needs versus your budget. If you need extensive features and integrations, the higher cost of Mews is justified; for smaller hotels, Zavia offers a cheaper entry point.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Mews’s larger ecosystem, proven track record, and high user ratings make it the superior choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable property management platform. Its extensive features support complex operations, automation, and guest experience improvements, making it suitable for most mid-sized and larger properties.
Zavia ERP, with its lower price point and regional focus, is ideal for small hotels in Latin America aiming for basic reservation management and OTA integration without the need for advanced features. It’s best suited for properties with less operational complexity.
Choose Mews if your hotel plans to expand, needs extensive integrations, or values proven global support. Opt for Zavia if you want an affordable, straightforward system embedded in your regional market landscape.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Zavia ERP 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zavia ERP 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Zavia ERP:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Zavia ERP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问