The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
my-bookings 表现出色 .
Noovy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 25 |
在分析了 25 条经验证的评价后,my-bookings 用户最看重其 ,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| my-bookings |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #38 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #52 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #22 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations, improves guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Both my-bookings and Noovy aim to address these needs, but they differ significantly. my-bookings is essentially a blank slate with no reviews or features, while Noovy has a robust, feature-rich platform with a strong review base. Which one can truly support your hotel’s growth?
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a proven, feature-packed platform with recent positive feedback or are open to an untested solution that may still meet basic needs. Are you looking for a system with more reliability and proven results? Or are you willing to explore an emerging platform?
my-bookings and Noovy are designed to manage reservations and streamline operations, yet they diverge sharply in maturity and user validation. my-bookings currently has zero reviews, indicating it’s either very new or not widely adopted, with no recent or user feedback. Conversely, Noovy boasts 19 reviews, all within the last six months, with a high 4.89 support rating and a score of 71.29 out of 100 on the HT Score metric.
Noovy’s recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and support, describing it as a reliable, fast, and user-friendly system. my-bookings, lacking reviews, provides no insight into real-world performance, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking proven efficiency.
Do you want a system with a track record of customer satisfaction? Or are you comfortable with an untested platform that might still meet your needs?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS that covers channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and guest communication, Noovy is the clear choice. It offers 48 unique features, including integrated CRS, automated night audit, online check-in/out, and real-time reporting, all praised by users for improving operational efficiency.
If your hotel requires a simple, minimal, or no-frills reservation management system, and you are willing to accept the risk of unverified performance, my-bookings might suffice. However, given its lack of reviews and features, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of modern hotel management.
For hotels that prioritize stability, proven tools, and extensive automation, Noovy is the safer, more effective option. If you’re okay with an untested platform and minimal features, you might consider my-bookings, but it’s not recommended.
Noovy’s user-friendliness is supported by a high 4.84/5 ease of use rating and numerous positive reviews emphasizing its simplicity, speed, and friendly support. Users praise its intuitive design, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training requirements, making staff adoption quick and hassle-free.
my-bookings has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without feedback, it’s uncertain whether your team will find it easy to integrate into daily operations.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy boasts 48 features, including a channel manager, integrated CRS, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, mobile app, and real-time reports—many of which are crucial for modern hotels. It also provides automation tools like payment requests, online check-in/out, and task management, streamlining daily tasks.
my-bookings offers no features at all, making it a very basic platform that likely lacks the capabilities needed for efficient management. Its absence of features indicates it’s not suitable for hotels seeking automation or advanced operational tools.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s support reputation is excellent, with a 4.89/5 rating and reviews highlighting fast, friendly, and effective assistance. Users mention that support is available 24/7 via phone and chat, and onboarding is smooth, reducing the learning curve.
my-bookings provides no support ratings or reviews, creating uncertainty about its customer service quality. With no proven support experience, it’s risky for hotels that depend on quick, reliable help.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy offers 40 verified integrations, including prominent OTAs, revenue management tools, and distribution partners like SiteMinder, Bookassist, and GuestRevu. These integrations enable seamless operations across multiple channels and systems, enhancing efficiency and sales.
my-bookings currently has no verified integrations, which could limit your ability to connect with other essential hotel systems and distribution channels. This lack could hinder growth and operational flexibility.
Edge: Noovy.
Since my-bookings has no reviews, it cannot be rated or benchmarked, whereas Noovy has a high user satisfaction score of 9.89/10 in NPS and 4.89/5 for customer support. Recent reviews primarily praise Noovy for its ease of use, automation, and support, with hotel segments like boutique hotels and city center hotels giving it high marks.
You can confidently rely on Noovy’s proven user feedback. Without reviews, my-bookings remains an unverified option with unknown hotel satisfaction levels.
Edge: Noovy.
my-bookings does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, making it difficult to evaluate its affordability or value.
Noovy charges a flat rate of $600 per room per month, with no implementation fee or trial period. Many users consider this a good value, given its extensive features and support.
In terms of transparency and value, Noovy clearly provides a predictable cost structure with strong feature support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Noovy offers a complete, feature-rich PMS with strong user validation, while my-bookings is an untested, minimal solution lacking reviews or features. This makes Noovy the clear choice for hotels seeking reliability, automation, and support.
Choose Noovy if you want an established platform with proven results, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. It is especially suitable for boutique, city center, and revenue-focused hotels aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
Opt for my-bookings only if your hotel has very basic needs, a tight budget, or you’re willing to accept risk in exchange for a no-frills reservation system. Keep in mind, its lack of features and reviews makes it a less dependable choice for most hotels.
This comparison was made based on the latest available reviews, ratings, and feature data. Noovy’s recent reviews and high ratings strongly support its position as the best choice for most hotels seeking a modern, reliable PMS.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| my-bookings |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | my-bookings |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。my-bookings 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。my-bookings 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
my-bookings:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。my-bookings 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案