The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MyStay 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
OKKAMI INC 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Payment & Authorizations.
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 43 | 0 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,MyStay 用户最看重其 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通,而 OKKAMI INC 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无接触办理入住
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与持续改进
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制选项
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | #9 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Your hotel needs a contactless check-in solution that streamlines operations, enhances guest experience, and offers reliable support. Both MyStay Check-in by MyStay and OKKAMI Contactless Check-In aim to meet these goals, but their offerings differ significantly. With MyStay's high customer ratings, extensive features, and proven regional presence, it clearly stands out as the more mature and trusted option for hoteliers seeking a comprehensive solution.
The key question: which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, location, and specific needs? Let’s compare their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide.
MyStay Check-in is designed for hotels looking for a straightforward, all-in-one contactless solution with proven customer satisfaction. It offers a range of features, including online check-in/out, digital signatures, integrated payments, and guest communication tools, all supported by a high rating from users and a broad regional presence. Its review count of 40 in the last six months and a 5/5 overall rating demonstrate strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers.
OKKAMI’s Contactless Check-In emphasizes pre-arrival document uploads, mobile key access, and express check-out, making it an attractive option for hotels prioritizing mobile room access and operational speed. However, it has zero reviews and no recent user feedback, which diminishes its credibility and makes it harder to gauge real-world performance.
Given that recent reviews are a critical confidence indicator, MyStay’s current positive user feedback makes it the more reliable choice. Are you willing to risk unproven solutions for potentially innovative features?
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
If your hotel needs a mature, extensively reviewed platform with proven regional reach and a rich set of features, go with MyStay. It’s ideal for properties of various sizes, especially those in North America, Europe, or Asia, seeking a solution with high user satisfaction, seamless PMS integration, and versatile guest communication tools.
If your hotel prioritizes mobile room access, pre-arrival document uploads, and express check-out, and you’re comfortable with an unreviewed platform, OKKAMI might be worth exploring. But note the lack of recent user feedback means you’ll be taking a risk on support and performance.
For most hoteliers aiming for reliability, ease of use, and proven results, MyStay remains the safer, more comprehensive pick.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay’s user experience is rated 4.91/5, with reviews praising its intuitive setup, simple interface, and quick onboarding process, making staff adoption straightforward. Users report that the platform’s automation and communication features are easy to configure, supporting fast deployment.
OKKAMI’s interface and onboarding details are absent, with no reviews available to assess ease of use or implementation. Its focus on device independence and document scanning suggests a user-friendly design, but the lack of feedback makes this uncertain.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay features include PMS integration, targeted guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel communication, digital payments, and offer testing—totaling 11 unique features. These tools support a full guest journey, from pre-arrival to post-stay, and help upsell services, enhancing revenue opportunities.
OKKAMI offers 16 features, including hotel website check-in portals, document scanning, ID verification, multilingual options, and PCI compliance—many focused on pre-arrival documentation and mobile key access. Despite a broader feature list, the absence of reviews makes it unclear how well these features perform operationally.
In terms of variety, OKKAMI provides more options, but MyStay’s targeted features are proven and highly rated, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay’s support is rated 4.93/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and continuous updates. Hoteliers appreciate the responsiveness and ongoing improvements, which foster confidence in long-term use.
OKKAMI’s support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to gauge customer service quality. The lack of documented support experiences raises concerns about post-implementation assistance, especially for hotels new to contactless tech.
For reliable, accessible support, MyStay’s high rating clearly favors it.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, and HotelTime. This extensive ecosystem reduces compatibility issues and simplifies setup for hotels already using multiple systems.
OKKAMI has 12 verified partner integrations, including some notable names like Infor and Cendyn, but fewer options limit flexibility. Shared partners like Oracle and Amadeus suggest some common ground, but overall, MyStay offers broader connectivity.
For integration flexibility and proven third-party support, MyStay’s larger partner network is advantageous.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay’s reviews are recent, with 40 feedback entries in the last six months and a 5/5 overall rating, reflecting strong current satisfaction. Users highlight its simplicity, automation, and seamless integration as key strengths, with a 98% likelihood to recommend.
In contrast, OKKAMI has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess hoteliers’ perceptions or satisfaction levels at this time.
Given ongoing positive feedback, MyStay’s rating clearly indicates higher overall hotelier approval.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
MyStay charges a straightforward base price of $400 per month, with no freemium options, trial periods, or additional implementation fees. This transparent pricing simplifies budgeting and planning for most hotels.
OKKAMI’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, and no trial or detailed fee structure is available, which complicates comparison. The absence of pricing transparency suggests that costs could be variable or customized per property.
For clarity and predictability, MyStay’s fixed monthly fee offers better value for hotels seeking straightforward budgeting.
Edge: MyStay Check-in.
Not ideal if you need a solution with untested support or operate in regions outside MyStay’s primary markets, such as some parts of Asia outside its core regions.
Not ideal if you require a mature, well-reviewed platform with extensive integrations and proven support, especially in Europe or North America.
MyStay offers a comprehensive, well-rated contactless check-in platform with proven results, broad integrations, and strong regional presence. Its features support a seamless guest journey, and high customer satisfaction makes it a safe choice for most hoteliers.
OKKAMI provides an extensive feature list with a focus on document management and mobile access, but the lack of recent reviews and support data makes it a riskier option. Its strengths might appeal to hotels that want to experiment with pre-arrival document uploads and mobile keys, but confidence in operational reliability remains uncertain.
For hotels seeking a dependable, widely adopted solution with clear support and proven satisfaction, MyStay remains the recommended choice. If your hotel is willing to take a chance on a newer platform with innovative features but untested support, OKKAMI could be considered—but only with cautious expectations.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,MyStay Check in 和 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 共享 3 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 分割 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 经前管理系统整合 | ||
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
| 辅助产品营销 | ||
| 酒店网站入住门户 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 15 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OKKAMI Contactless Check-In 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。OKKAMI Contactless Check-In:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,OKKAMI INC 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问