The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MyStay 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
PassportScan 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 43 | 0 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,MyStay 用户最看重其 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通,而 PassportScan 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无接触办理入住
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与持续改进
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制选项
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check in and PassportScan Cloud hinges on your hotel's specific needs for contactless check-in. Both aim to streamline arrivals, reduce face-to-face contact, and enhance guest experience, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. MyStay offers a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations and features, while PassportScan provides a simpler, more straightforward check-in process without the same breadth of functionality.
Your team should consider whether you need a full-service platform with advanced automation or a basic digital check-in solution. Are you prepared to invest in a more feature-rich system, or is a streamlined, cost-effective approach sufficient? The choice will impact your operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
MyStay Check in is designed for hotels seeking a full-scale contactless guest journey, offering features like PMS integration, guest segmentation, and multiple communication channels. It’s ideal if your property aims to upsell services, automate communication, and manage guest data centrally. Conversely, PassportScan focuses solely on digital check-in via secure links or QR codes, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing a quick, minimal-touch registration process.
MyStay’s 40 reviews in the last six months and a near-perfect 9.8/5 NPS score highlight its recent strong performance and high user satisfaction. PassportScan’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s less actively supported or evaluated, making MyStay the more reliable, current choice. Are you ready to invest in a scalable, feature-rich platform, or do you prefer a basic digital check-in?
If your hotel needs a feature-packed system that integrates deeply with PMS, supports guest segmentation, and offers multi-channel communication, go with MyStay. Its 40 recent reviews and high ratings confirm its robustness, especially for properties looking to automate upselling, digital payments, and door lock integration.
If your primary goal is a simple, fast digital check-in without the need for advanced features or integrations, PassportScan might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews, lack of feature depth, and no verified integrations, it’s hard to justify over the more established MyStay platform. For most hotels aiming for operational efficiency and guest experience, MyStay is the clear winner.
MyStay’s user experience is rated 4.91/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive setup, simple interface, and quick onboarding process. Hoteliers report that staff adoption is straightforward and that the platform is easy to operate after minimal training. PassportScan, however, has no available user ratings or recent reviews, leaving its usability unverified and uncertain.
Given this, the edge clearly goes to MyStay. Its high ease-of-use rating and positive feedback suggest your team will be able to implement and operate the system with minimal disruption, maximizing your investment.
MyStay offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel communication, digital payments, door lock integration, self-service kiosks, and offer orchestration. PassportScan, by comparison, provides only basic digital check-in via secure links or QR codes, with no additional features or integrations.
The feature count and depth make MyStay the superior choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution that supports automation, upselling, and operational integration. If your goal is to enhance guest engagement and streamline operations, MyStay’s feature set offers a clear advantage. Edge: MyStay Check in.
MyStay’s support rating is 4.93/5, with hoteliers praising its prompt, helpful, and responsive service. Users have described support interactions as efficient and supportive, contributing to smoother onboarding and problem resolution. PassportScan, lacking recent reviews and support ratings, offers no comparable data.
Given the importance of reliable support in complex integrations and daily operations, MyStay’s high support score provides reassurance. Your team will likely find assistance quick and effective when needed, making it the safer choice for ongoing operational needs. Edge: MyStay Check in.
MyStay’s overall rating is 5/5 from 40 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, feature richness, and positive guest impact. It’s particularly favored by hotels with diverse segments, including boutique hotels, serviced apartments, and city-center properties, which give it a 5/5 rating overall.
PassportScan has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or compare property-specific feedback. Without recent data, it’s evident MyStay’s reputation is stronger and more trusted among hoteliers. Edge: MyStay Check in.
MyStay’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no freemium options or implementation fees. This flat fee covers a broad suite of features and integrations, providing predictable costs for hotel budgets.
PassportScan’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of fees or plans. Its lack of transparent pricing and features suggests it’s a less comprehensive solution, potentially limiting scalability or integration options. For clear value and predictable expenses, MyStay offers a compelling package. Edge: MyStay Check in.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a basic check-in solution without need for integrations or advanced automation.
Not ideal if your hotel aims to automate many operational tasks, upsell, or integrate with other hotel management systems.
MyStay is a comprehensive contactless check-in platform that offers a broad set of features, integrations, and high support ratings, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution. Its recent reviews and high NPS score demonstrate its effectiveness and user satisfaction, especially for properties that want to automate and upscale their guest experience.
PassportScan provides a straightforward digital check-in process, ideal for hotels that need a quick, inexpensive solution without additional features or integrations. However, with no recent reviews or ratings and limited functionality, it lacks the credibility and support robustness of MyStay.
For most hotels looking to improve operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue opportunities, MyStay Check in is the recommended choice. It combines a proven track record, extensive features, and strong support to meet modern hospitality demands confidently.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,MyStay Check in 和 PassportScan Cloud 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 分割 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 经前管理系统整合 | ||
| 辅助产品营销 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 PassportScan Cloud 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 PassportScan Cloud 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。PassportScan Cloud:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,PassportScan 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问