The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #23 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | #15 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check-in by MyStay and Roommatik by Roommatik hinges on your hotel's specific needs for contactless check-in solutions. Both products aim to streamline operations and reduce staff workload, but they approach this goal differently. MyStay offers a comprehensive digital platform with automation and integrations, while Roommatik provides unattended kiosks that emphasize speed and minimal staff interaction. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize a full-featured platform or a hardware-focused approach.
Both products address the need to improve guest flow and safety during check-in, but MyStay’s strength lies in its extensive feature set and recent customer feedback, whereas Roommatik’s solution is more hardware-centric with limited recent reviews. Which solution aligns better with your operational model?
MyStay and Roommatik both solve the challenge of reducing contact points during check-in and check-out, but they target different hotel types and operational styles. MyStay’s software is suited for hotels seeking automation, guest segmentation, targeted upselling, and integration with property management systems, making it ideal for properties aiming for a digital-first experience. Roommatik’s unattended kiosks are designed for hotels that want to eliminate front desk staffing entirely, focusing on speed and self-service.
MyStay is better for hotels with a desire to automate communication, offer personalized upselling, and manage complex guest data, while Roommatik is ideal for budget, limited-service, or boutique hotels wanting a quick, hardware-based check-in system. Do you need a full digital platform, or are you looking for hardware to replace front desk staff?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich contactless check-in platform with automation, guest segmentation, and seamless PMS integration, go with MyStay. It’s especially suited for properties in Europe, North America, or regions where comprehensive digital solutions are prioritized. On the other hand, if your hotel’s primary goal is to reduce staffing costs with unattended kiosks that operate 24/7 and support multiple languages, Roommatik offers a straightforward, hardware-focused solution.
Property size, operational complexity, and regional customer expectations should guide your decision. For hotels looking for an all-in-one platform, MyStay’s deeper feature set makes it the more versatile choice. For those prioritizing speed and minimal staffing, Roommatik’s kiosks deliver faster onboarding and simplicity.
MyStay’s user interface scores 4.91/5, with many reviewers citing its intuitive setup and ease of onboarding. Customers describe the platform as straightforward, with quick implementation and seamless staff adoption, making it accessible even for properties new to digital check-in. Support and onboarding ratings (4.82/5) reinforce its user-friendly reputation.
Roommatik’s kiosks are designed for straightforward self-service, supporting 15 languages, and allowing guests to check-in independently. Reviewers highlight the simplicity and speed, noting guests can get a room key in less than a minute and control the kiosks remotely if needed.
Edge: MyStay, due to its higher usability ratings and comprehensive onboarding support.
MyStay provides a suite of 13 unique features, including guest segmentation, room upgrades, multi-channel messaging, digital acceptance and payments, offer templates, and integration with door lock systems—all tailored to enhance guest experience and revenue. It also offers tools for upselling, automation, and data management, making it suitable for hotels wanting a detailed, customizable platform.
Roommatik’s standout feature is its easy room selection, supported by its unattended kiosks, and its ability to operate without on-site staff. However, it lacks the extensive automation and marketing features that MyStay offers.
Edge: MyStay, with its broader feature set and automation tools.
MyStay’s support and onboarding scores are slightly higher at 4.93/5, with reviewers praising their quick response times and helpful assistance. Customers mention that the team provides effective support during setup and ongoing use, making implementation smoother.
Roommatik has a support rating of 4.71/5, with reviews indicating that support is friendly and responsive but less detailed than MyStay’s. Guests report the kiosks as easy to operate, but the platform’s support experience is less highlighted.
Edge: MyStay, thanks to its higher support and onboarding scores.
MyStay boasts 30 verified partners, including major channel managers and property management systems like SiteMinder, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality. Its extensive integrations facilitate smooth data flow and operational efficiency across different platforms.
Roommatik has 26 verified partners, including some notable integrations like Cloudbeds and dormakaba, but fewer than MyStay’s network. Both solutions integrate with key locks and property management systems, but MyStay’s wider partner ecosystem offers more flexibility.
Edge: MyStay, with more verified integrations.
MyStay has 40 recent reviews, with an average rating of 5/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (98%). Hoteliers across diverse segments praise its ease of use, automation, and support, especially noting its effectiveness in reducing costs and improving guest experience.
Roommatik’s 7 reviews also rate it 5/5, but with less recent feedback and slightly lower confidence. Customers appreciate the speed and simplicity of check-ins but lack the depth of overall satisfaction found with MyStay.
Edge: MyStay, based on more recent reviews and higher overall ratings.
MyStay charges a base price of $400 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and integrations, suitable for hotels looking for a full platform.
Roommatik does not disclose specific pricing, suggesting a customized quote, likely based on hardware and service scope. There are no free trials or transparent monthly fees, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MyStay is a feature-rich, well-supported platform designed for hotels aiming to automate and personalize guest check-in and check-out processes. Its broad integration options and advanced features make it suitable for properties seeking a digital transformation.
Roommatik excels in providing unattended kiosks that deliver rapid check-in in multiple languages, ideal for hotels prioritizing speed and minimal staff. Its hardware setup is perfect for properties that want to eliminate queues without extensive digital infrastructure.
If your hotel desires a comprehensive, customizable system with ongoing support, MyStay remains the stronger choice. However, if swift, hardware-only check-in suits your operational model, Roommatik offers a straightforward solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 Roommatik 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roommatik 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。Roommatik:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,Roommatik 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问