The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | #22 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check-in by MyStay and TMRW Hotel Checkin by TMRW LIFE hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and guest experience goals. Both solutions aim to make check-in contactless and reduce staff workload, but they diverge significantly in features, user base, and market presence. Since MyStay has substantially more reviews and recent feedback, it offers a more tested and trusted platform for hotels seeking a reliable contactless solution.
Your team should consider what matters most: whether you need a broad feature set and a proven track record or a more streamlined, integrated guest app. Which platform best aligns with your hotel’s size, segment, and digital ambitions?
MyStay Check-in excels at providing a comprehensive, flexible contactless check-in solution with over 40 reviews and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5. Its broad regional presence and strong customer support make it suitable for diverse hotel types, especially those seeking advanced automation and integration capabilities.
TMRW Hotel Checkin, with only a single recent review and no overall rating, offers a simplified, easy-to-use guest-facing app that focuses on automation and streamlining operations for hotel chains and serviced apartments. However, its limited review count makes it a less established choice for hoteliers prioritizing proven reliability.
Are you looking for a platform with a proven track record and extensive feature options, or a straightforward app designed for fast deployment? This fundamental question will guide your decision.
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, feature-rich contactless check-in system with a large regional footprint, go with MyStay. Its extensive feature set — including guest segmentation, upselling, multi-channel communication, and online payments — is suited for hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
For hotels that primarily operate in serviced apartments or extended stays, and want a simple, guest-facing app to automate check-ins and key management, TMRW LIFE could suffice. Its device-agnostic, easy-to-use interface offers a quick, minimal-touch solution, but lacks the depth of features and proven support found in MyStay.
This makes MyStay the better choice for hotels seeking reliability and advanced functionality, while TMRW may appeal to those prioritizing simplicity and quick implementation.
MyStay’s user ratings reflect a high ease of use at 4.91/5, and most reviews highlight its intuitive setup and straightforward guest interface. Its onboarding process is well-rated at 4.82/5, with hoteliers praising its quick deployment and minimal staff training requirements.
TMRW LIFE scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with a simple, guest-facing app that’s easy to operate across devices. However, with just one review, we lack broader feedback on onboarding and staff adoption.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 9 unique features, including guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, offer templates, and digital payment capture — features that TMRW LIFE does not provide. These enable targeted marketing, revenue optimization, and flexible communication strategies.
TMRW LIFE includes 4 features like device agnosticism, pre-arrival upselling, easy room selection, and ID verification. While these suit streamlined check-in processes, they lack the depth and customization options of MyStay’s suite.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support and onboarding ratings are both high at 4.93/5 and 4.82/5 respectively, with reviews citing prompt and helpful assistance. Users appreciate the continuous updates and active communication from the team, which bolsters confidence in long-term reliability.
TMRW LIFE scores 5/5 in support, but with only one recent review, it’s difficult to gauge consistency or volume of customer service. Given the extensive user feedback for MyStay, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay connects with 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Onity, Clock, and WuBook. Its broad integration ecosystem ensures smooth operation across various hotel tech stacks.
TMRW LIFE has only 5 verified partners, including Stripe and Vingcard, with fewer options for seamless integration. This limits flexibility for hotels with complex systems.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s users, primarily in diverse hotel segments such as serviced apartments, boutique hotels, and city hotels, rate it at 5/5 based on 40 reviews. Recent feedback consistently praises its reliability, features, and support.
TMRW LIFE, with only one review from a serviced apartment operator, cannot provide a broader rating trend. Its limited data makes it hard to assess overall user satisfaction.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay charges a flat monthly fee of $400 with no implementation or trial fees. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking an all-in-one solution.
Pricing for TMRW LIFE is not publicly available, which could complicate budgeting decisions. Its lack of transparent costs suggests a custom quote approach, often typical of high-end integrated solutions.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal, simple guest app with limited features, or operate only in highly specialized segments with very specific needs.
Not ideal if you need extensive automation, detailed segmentation, or integrations with multiple PMS and revenue management tools.
MyStay Check-in offers a comprehensive, robust platform with proven success and a broad feature set, making it ideal for hotels seeking reliability and operational flexibility. Its extensive support, integrations, and high user ratings provide confidence in long-term use.
TMRW Hotel Checkin presents a sleek, simple guest app that emphasizes ease of use and quick onboarding. However, its limited reviews and features make it better suited for smaller, tech-forward properties or chains focusing on guest experience without complex automation.
For most hotels evaluating these two, MyStay is the safer, more proven choice. It’s the platform with more reviews, recent positive feedback, and a broader feature set that can scale with your needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 TMRW Hotel Checkin 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TMRW Hotel Checkin 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。TMRW Hotel Checkin 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。TMRW Hotel Checkin:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,TMRW LIFE 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问