The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
You're evaluating two contactless check-in solutions—MyStay Check-in by MyStay and Trevo.ai by Trevo—both designed to streamline hotel operations and enhance guest experience. While both aim to reduce physical interactions and improve efficiency, their core functionalities, integration depth, and market presence differ significantly. Your choice hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, regional focus, and desired features.
MyStay focuses on comprehensive automation, guest communication, and extensive integrations, leading with a high review count and recent positive feedback. Trevo emphasizes biometric verification and simplified guest check-in via face recognition, but its limited reviews and regional restrictions make it less proven. Are you prioritizing a mature, well-supported platform or a newer, biometric-driven technology?
Both platforms address contactless check-in, but MyStay offers a broader suite of features rooted in automation and guest engagement, supported by a solid track record. Trevo’s solution centers on biometric verification, providing rapid check-ins with facial recognition, but it lacks the extensive review data and global market presence MyStay boasts.
MyStay’s 40 reviews in multiple regions, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 98% likelihood to recommend, reflect widespread user satisfaction. Trevo, on the other hand, has no reviews yet, making its reliability less certain. This substantial difference raises the question: do you want a tried-and-true platform or a new entrant with innovative tech but limited user feedback?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported contactless check-in platform with a rich feature set, go with MyStay. It’s ideal for properties seeking automation, guest communication, and extensive integrations, especially if you operate across multiple regions.
If biometric verification and ultra-fast check-in are your priorities, and you're willing to accept the risk of a less proven platform, Trevo’s face recognition solution could appeal. However, its minimal review data and regional focus suggest it’s better suited for innovative hotels in Asia Pacific willing to experiment with biometric tech.
Ultimately, choose MyStay if you want reliability, broad functionality, and a proven track record. Opt for Trevo if biometric speed and privacy are critical, and you’re comfortable with limited market validation.
MyStay scores a 4.91/5 for ease of use, supported by its simple interface, quick onboarding, and positive reviews about setup efficiency. Hoteliers find it intuitive, with many mentioning how quickly they adopted and integrated the platform into daily operations.
Trevo’s ease of use is less documented, and with no reviews available, it's unclear how intuitive its face verification system is in real-world settings. Given Trevo’s reliance on biometric tech, which can sometimes pose onboarding challenges, the uncertainty favors MyStay.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay features include guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel communication, digital payments, and offer testing—totaling 11 exclusive features. These tools support upselling, targeted marketing, and detailed guest profiling, which Trevo does not offer.
Trevo’s unique offerings include facial verification, mobile check-in/out, multilingual translations, and device-agnostic access—all valuable but less extensive in scope. With 12 features exclusive to Trevo, it excels in biometric tech but falls short on automation and marketing tools.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support team scores a 4.93/5, with reviewers praising prompt, helpful assistance and ongoing feature updates. Many hoteliers mention how support helped smooth onboarding and troubleshoot issues swiftly, boosting confidence in the platform.
Trevo, with no available support ratings or reviews, offers no verified data on customer service quality. For hoteliers prioritizing reliable, responsive support, MyStay’s proven record provides a clear advantage.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay boasts 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Kwentra, and HotelTime. Its extensive integration network facilitates seamless data flow and operational efficiency.
Trevo has only 8 verified partners, primarily focusing on payment systems and hardware providers, with fewer PMS integrations. This narrower ecosystem might limit your ability to connect with existing hotel management tools.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s reviews are recent, with 40 hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Property types such as serviced apartments and boutique hotels rate it highly, with many giving 5/5 scores and a 98% likelihood to recommend.
Trevo’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific ratings. Given the volume and recency of feedback for MyStay, it is clearly the favored platform among hoteliers.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay charges a $400 monthly flat fee without a free tier or trial, making costs predictable. Trevo does not disclose specific pricing, leaving potential buyers uncertain about budget requirements.
While MyStay’s transparent pricing suggests straightforward budgeting, Trevo’s unknown costs could pose budgeting risks, especially for smaller hotels or those seeking flexible plans.
Not ideal if your hotel relies on biometric verification or operates solely in markets where Trevo’s face recognition tech is more relevant.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers tested automation, extensive guest communication tools, or values broad integration options.
MyStay offers a dependable, feature-rich platform supported by a large review base, making it suitable for most hotels seeking automation, communication, and integration. Its high ratings and regional coverage ensure reliable performance and ongoing support.
Trevo provides biometric check-in via facial recognition, promising fast, contactless arrivals. However, its lack of reviews and limited regional presence make it better suited for experimental properties in Asia Pacific willing to accept higher risk for technological innovation.
If your hotel needs a proven, comprehensive contactless solution, go with MyStay. If speed, biometric verification, and privacy are your top concerns—and your hotel is in a region where Trevo’s tech is applicable—consider Trevo.
In summary, MyStay’s proven track record and feature set make it the clear choice for most hotels. Trevo, while innovative, is better suited for properties eager to adopt biometric tech and prepared for limited support validation.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 Trevo.ai 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Trevo.ai 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。Trevo.ai:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,Trevo 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问