The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 10 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 7 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #8 3 条评价 | #15 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 11 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #12 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #7 3 条评价 | #11 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #4 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check in by MyStay and Zaplox Self-service Kiosk by Zaplox hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and guest experience goals. Both products address contactless check-in, but they do so with different strengths and focuses. MyStay primarily offers a comprehensive digital check-in and communication platform, while Zaplox emphasizes a flexible, hardware-agnostic kiosk experience. How do these differences impact your decision?
MyStay's platform is built around automating guest check-in, check-out, and communication, making it ideal for properties looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest engagement. Zaplox, on the other hand, offers a more hardware-neutral kiosk solution, supporting a variety of devices and lock systems for more flexible implementation. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s tech infrastructure and guest service vision?
MyStay excels at simplifying guest check-in through a mobile-first approach, with a focus on automating communication, online payments, and guest data management. Its many reviews praise its ease of use, robust integrations, and features like guest segmentation, upselling, and digital acceptance, making it suitable for hotels aiming for a full contactless experience.
Zaplox offers a straightforward, hardware-agnostic self-service kiosk that can run on nearly any tablet, supporting mobile keys, checkouts, and payment management. Its reviews emphasize stability, ease of operation, and the ability to reduce front desk workload, especially in hostels, city hotels, and budget properties.
Given the review count and recency, MyStay’s more positive ratings and higher overall scores make it the stronger choice. Are you prioritizing a full guest communication platform or a flexible kiosk solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive online check-in system with features like guest segmentation, targeted offers, and automated communication, go with MyStay. Its ability to handle online forms, digital signatures, and integrated upselling makes it ideal for properties seeking to maximize revenue and guest engagement.
If your hotel requires a flexible, device-agnostic kiosk for quick check-in and check-out, especially in a high-volume environment like hostels or city center hotels, Zaplox is more appropriate. Its support for mobile keys and compatibility with various lock systems makes it a good fit for properties wanting to upgrade their front desk operations without overhauling their hardware.
For most hotels, MyStay’s broader feature set and recent positive reviews make it the more compelling choice, especially if you want an all-in-one digital guest journey. However, if hardware flexibility and quick deployment matter most, Zaplox delivers a reliable self-service kiosk experience.
MyStay boasts an impressive average ease-of-use rating of 4.91/5, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Onboarding reviews highlight quick integration with property management systems and simple guest communication workflows, making staff adoption smooth.
Zaplox scores a 4.17/5, with users appreciating its stability and compatibility across various devices. However, some review mentions point to occasional technical issues and longer setup times due to development team changes, which may slightly hinder staff adoption.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 10 unique features, including guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel messaging, digital payment capture, and offer orchestration. These tools support personalized guest engagement and revenue growth, particularly through targeted marketing and upselling.
Zaplox provides 21 features, including device agnosticism, remote check-in, mobile app, guest messaging, room service ordering, and multi-lingual support. Its extensive feature set emphasizes operational flexibility, mobile keys, and guest self-service, particularly suited for properties prioritizing hardware independence.
While Zaplox’s feature count surpasses MyStay, the latter’s specialized functionalities around guest targeting and upselling may offer more immediate value. For a focus on automation and marketing, edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support scores a 4.93/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, helpful assistance and ongoing feature updates. Users mention that MyStay’s team is responsive and committed to improving the platform, which enhances confidence in its reliability.
Zaplox’s support scores a 3/5, with reviews citing occasional delays and challenges due to developer team changes. Some users note that support can be inconsistent, impacting their ability to resolve issues swiftly.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay connects with 30 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Net Affinity. Its extensive integration network simplifies data flow and operational management for larger or multi-system properties.
Zaplox integrates with 17 verified partners, including prominent PMS and lock system providers like Salto and Infor. While its integrations are solid, they are fewer and more focused on hardware compatibility.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s reviews are more recent and overwhelmingly positive, with an overall rating of 5/5, a 98% likelihood to recommend, and a 9.8/5 NPS score. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and ability to cut costs, especially in serviced apartments and boutique hotels.
Zaplox’s average rating is 4/5, with a 80% recommendation rate. Reviews highlight stability and guest satisfaction but also mention technical issues and support challenges.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay charges a flat monthly fee of $400, with no implementation or trial fees. Its predictable pricing model allows hotels to budget accordingly.
Zaplox’s pricing is not publicly detailed, with no trial or flat-rate info available. Its costs may vary based on hardware and integration needs, making budgeting less straightforward.
Based on available data, MyStay offers clearer value and affordability with its fixed monthly rate.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MyStay Check in stands out as the more feature-rich, well-supported, and recent-reviewed product. Its comprehensive automation, guest communication, and upselling tools make it suitable for mid to large hotels seeking a complete contactless guest journey.
Zaplox offers a reliable, hardware-agnostic kiosk solution that reduces front desk workload and supports mobile keys. It’s a good choice for properties that prioritize quick deployment and hardware flexibility over extensive guest engagement features.
If your goal is a fully integrated digital solution with personalized communication and revenue tools, choose MyStay. If you want a flexible, simple kiosk to handle basic check-in and check-out, Zaplox is the better fit.
In summary: For most hotels looking for a well-supported, feature-packed platform with proven recent reviews, MyStay Check in is the clear leader. Its broader capabilities and recent positive feedback provide confidence to hoteliers ready to upgrade their contactless check-in process.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MyStay Check in 和 Zaplox Self-service Kiosk 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。MyStay Check in 提供 30 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Self-service Kiosk 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MyStay Check in:否。Zaplox Self-service Kiosk:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MyStay 的 HT Score 为 22,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问