The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
odyssea 表现出色 .
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 40 |
在分析了 40 条经验证的评价后,odyssea 用户最看重其 ,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 易于使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| odyssea |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
集成和连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制
▾
|
|
|
−
同步问题
▾
|
|
|
−
数据库搜索功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | odyssea |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #28 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #28 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | odyssea |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #25 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #30 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | odyssea |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #12 23 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can dramatically impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Odyssea by odyssea and Vertical Booking aim to streamline reservations and improve operational efficiency, but they serve different needs and markets. Your decision hinges on understanding their core strengths, user feedback, and how each aligns with your hotel's size and target clientele.
Odyssea has no recent reviews or ratings, making it nearly impossible to assess its current performance. In contrast, Vertical Booking boasts over 37 recent reviews, a high rating of 4.64/5, and a strong net promoter score of 9.16/10, indicating broader user satisfaction and recent engagement. Is a platform with active user feedback more reliable for your upcoming investment?
Odyssea aims to be an all-encompassing AI-powered platform that offers detailed operational insights and strategic recommendations. However, it has no verified reviews, no recent feedback, and a rating of zero, making its effectiveness unverified. On the other hand, Vertical Booking is well-established with a 4.64/5 rating based on 37 reviews, mostly recent, and a net promoter score of 9.16/10. It is praised for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive integrations, and strong customer support.
Vertical Booking's reviews highlight its ease of use, excellent support, and proven ability to increase direct bookings. Some users mention issues with search functionality and synchronization delays, but overall, it maintains a high satisfaction level. With more recent feedback and a solid reputation, Vertical Booking clearly has the edge. Are you willing to rely on an untested platform like Odyssea, or do recent reviews and high ratings guide your choice?
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed booking engine that drives direct reservations and manages multiple channels easily, Vertical Booking is the better choice. Its extensive real-world feedback confirms its ability to boost revenue through a user-friendly interface and robust integrations.
Conversely, Odyssea appears to be a more experimental or less established platform, with no verified reviews or recent feedback. Its AI-driven approach might appeal if you're exploring innovative solutions, but without proven results, Vertical Booking remains the safer, more dependable option for most hotels. For hotels seeking proven performance, Vertical Booking is the clear winner.
Vertical Booking scores 4.49/5 in ease of use, based on multiple recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick setup, and user-friendly controls. Many users describe it as easy to operate, with straightforward onboarding and minimal training required. Support from the company is highly rated, with quick responses to technical issues and helpful guidance.
In comparison, Odyssea's usability data is nonexistent, and with zero reviews, we cannot gauge how your team would experience its interface or onboarding process. Without user feedback, Odyssea's ease of use remains unverified. Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking offers a wide array of integrations—69 verified partners—including PMS systems, OTAs, and GDS channels—helping streamline operations. It also provides advanced tools for channel management, revenue rules, and rate adjustments, which reviews frequently praise for their flexibility and ease of use.
Odyssea has no listed features or verified integrations, making it impossible to compare its capabilities. Its AI focus might suggest innovative functionalities, but without concrete feature data or user feedback, Vertical Booking proves to be the more feature-rich, reliable platform. Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking's reviews consistently highlight responsive, helpful customer support, with many users appreciating quick issue resolution and local contact points. Its support team scores 4.57/5, and users describe their experience as professional and solution-oriented.
Odyssea scores 0/5 in support ratings, and with no recent reviews, its responsiveness and customer service quality are unverified. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, Vertical Booking clearly offers a more dependable service. Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking integrates with 69 verified partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and OTAs, allowing comprehensive connectivity. Its extensive partner network simplifies multi-channel management and helps maximize operational efficiency.
Odyssea has zero verified integrations, leaving its connectivity capabilities uncertain. Without established integrations, Odyssea may pose challenges for hotels needing multi-platform management. Clearly, Vertical Booking’s broader integration ecosystem is the stronger choice. Edge: Vertical Booking.
No recent reviews or ratings exist for Odyssea, so hotelier sentiment is unavailable. Vertical Booking, however, has a 4.64/5 rating based on 37 recent reviews, with positive comments about its ease of use, customer support, and ability to increase direct bookings.
Most recent user feedback favors Vertical Booking, emphasizing its reliability and customer-centric approach. If recent reviews indicate hotelier satisfaction as a priority, Vertical Booking is the clear superior. Edge: Vertical Booking.
Odyssea offers no publicly listed pricing, no free trial, and no implementation fee, suggesting it may be custom or less transparent. Vertical Booking also does not disclose specific prices, but reviews mention a reasonable price point and strong ROI, emphasizing value.
Without concrete pricing data, your best bet is to compare based on proven performance and support. Given Vertical Booking's established presence and positive reviews about value, it offers more confidence in terms of cost-benefit. Edge: Vertical Booking.
Not ideal if:
Odyssea might suit hotels looking for future-focused AI tools but isn’t recommended for those prioritizing proven features and support.
Not ideal if:
Vertical Booking is best suited for hotels prioritizing reliability, integrations, and recent positive feedback.
Vertical Booking provides a reliable, well-reviewed booking engine that is trusted by many hoteliers worldwide. Its extensive integrations, strong customer support, and proven ability to increase direct bookings make it the safer choice.
If your hotel values proven results and current user satisfaction, Vertical Booking’s recent reviews and high ratings clearly demonstrate its superiority. Odyssea, while potentially innovative, lacks recent validation and user feedback, making it a risky investment for most hotels. For a dependable, well-supported booking solution, Vertical Booking is the definitive option.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| odyssea |
|
|---|
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且... 虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且乐于助人。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格并轻松管理优惠价格。
许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需... 许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需要更好的文档和更直观的设计。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大... 用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大的设计自定义选项和用户更改界面元素(如颜色和字体)的权限。
一些评论指出,Vertical Booking 的渠道管理器与其 PMS 之间存在同步延迟,影响了房源和价格的实时更新。建议加快同步速度以提高整体效率。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Odyssea 和 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Odyssea 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Odyssea:否。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。odyssea 的 HT Score 为 0,Vertical Booking 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问