项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #40 3 条评价 | #31 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #36 5 条评价 | #31 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 6 条评价 | #20 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #20 2 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #32 9 条评价 | #33 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 6 条评价 | #32 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 9 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #31 3 条评价 | #34 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 14 条评价 | #15 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s direct revenue growth and guest experience. Both p3 Booking Engine by p3 Hotels and VISIT by VISIT aim to streamline bookings and boost profits, but they diverge in features, user feedback, and support. p3 Hotels boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating a more current and trusted solution. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both platforms are designed to increase direct bookings, yet they approach this goal differently. p3 Hotels emphasizes a high-converting, flexible, and highly customizable booking experience, with a focus on seamless integration with OPERA PMS and specialized features like loyalty tools. VISIT offers a broader property management approach, combining a booking engine with marketing tools, channel management, and reputation features. Given the recent review count and ratings, p3 Hotels currently appears more validated by user feedback, but VISIT’s extensive feature set may appeal to properties seeking an all-in-one solution.
Are you looking for a dedicated booking engine with proven conversion improvements, or a broader management platform with booking as part of a larger ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a high-quality, performance-driven booking engine primarily focused on conversion and seamless integration with Oracle OPERA PMS, go with p3 Hotels. Its strong user ratings (4.67/5 from 16 reviews) and recent feedback demonstrate satisfaction for properties prioritizing direct booking growth. Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive platform that combines booking, marketing, channel management, and reputation tracking, VISIT’s all-in-one approach and superior review score (5/5 from 28 reviews) make it the better choice.
For properties that value dedicated booking optimization, p3 Hotels is likely the safer bet. For those seeking an integrated, versatile system that covers more operational aspects, VISIT may serve you better.
p3 Hotels’ user rating of 4.5/5 indicates a highly intuitive interface, praised for its back-office usability and straightforward booking process. Users mention that the platform is very user-friendly and that staff find onboarding smooth, although some suggest that communication about new features could improve. VISIT boasts a slightly higher ease-of-use score at 4.89/5, with reviews consistently highlighting its simple, flexible interface and excellent customer support.
Edge: VISIT, for its slightly higher ratings and positive feedback on ease of use across multiple hotel types.
p3 Hotels offers 40 shared features plus four unique capabilities—customizable exit intent modals, ADA compliance, and payment integrations like Stripe and PayU—that VISIT does not. These extra features might be critical depending on your hotel’s needs, especially if you require specific integrations or compliance standards. VISIT, however, excels in its comprehensive packaging, channel manager, gift card sales, and reputation management tools, making it a well-rounded platform.
Edge: p3 Hotels, due to its unique features tailored for customizability and compliance that VISIT lacks.
Both platforms receive high support ratings, but VISIT’s score of 4.93/5 and consistent praise in reviews indicate a slight edge. Users mention that VISIT’s support team is responsive, friendly, and proactive, often highlighting the value of ongoing assistance. p3 Hotels’ 4.59/5 rating reflects strong support, yet some users note opportunities for faster responses and better communication about product updates.
Edge: VISIT, for its slightly higher support ratings and customer praise.
VISIT connects to 19 verified partners, including leading systems like SiteMinder, Mews, and RateGain, offering broader integration options. p3 Hotels, with 14 verified partners, includes notable integrations like Stripe, Adyen, and Oracle Hospitality, but fewer overall. Shared integrations include The Hotels Network and Lighthouse. If your hotel relies heavily on specific third-party systems, VISIT’s larger integration network could be advantageous.
Edge: VISIT, for its broader range of verified integrations.
VISIT’s perfect 5/5 rating from 27 reviews indicates higher perceived satisfaction, especially among boutique and resort properties. p3 Hotels’ 4.67/5 from 16 reviews is still strong, but the recency and volume of VISIT’s reviews suggest more current approval. Hotels in various segments, especially those requiring detailed customization and support, tend to rate VISIT higher.
Edge: VISIT, based on higher average ratings and recent review volume.
p3 Hotels’ pricing starts at $500 per month without a trial or additional fees, offering a straightforward flat fee. VISIT’s base price is $800 per month, also with no trial info, making it more expensive but possibly including more features or broader support. Your total cost will depend on the specific features and integrations your hotel requires.
The core difference lies in scope: p3 Hotels focuses on delivering a high-conversion, customizable booking engine optimized for direct bookings, while VISIT offers an integrated platform combining booking with marketing and operational tools. If your hotel’s primary goal is to maximize online booking and revenue with a proven, easy-to-use system, p3 Hotels is the safer choice. For properties that seek a comprehensive suite to manage reservations, reputation, and distribution from a single platform, VISIT is better.
Choose p3 Hotels if your hotel values conversion, advanced features, and a straightforward interface. Opt for VISIT if you want a broad toolset that merges booking with management and marketing functions, especially if you already use other systems like Mews or RateGain. Ultimately, your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic priorities and existing technology ecosystem.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
BookVisit 的支持团队经常因响应迅速和乐于助人而受到称赞。用户对持续的开发和更新表示赞赏,但有些人认为,响应速度更快和指南更完善还有待改进。
该平台的易用性显著提升了客人体验,从而提高了转化率。其用户友好的界面受到客人和管理员的一致好评。不过,有些人认为移动界面和票务管理还有改进空间。
与 PMS 系统和各种 OTA 渠道的集成备受推崇,可简化操作。关键是,一些用户希望更好地与特定系统集成,例如餐桌预订和 SPA 管理。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
BookVisit 提供了良好的统计和收入管理工具,但用户建议实施更多动态定价功能以简化房间类型和入住率管理。
用户对后台预订管理和分析功能表示赞赏,认为这些功能有助于日常运营。但是,他们呼吁改进价格管理系统,并简化复杂预订变更的导航。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 和 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels) 提供 14 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
p3 Booking Engine (by p3 Hotels):否。VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。p3 Hotels 的 HT Score 为 0,VISIT 的为 23。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐