The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店维护软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #7 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 41 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 22 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 54 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 11 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 60 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #7 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #7 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Quore and UpKeep hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and the depth of features you require for maintenance management. Quore offers a comprehensive platform tailored for hoteliers, emphasizing communication, record-keeping, and integration, whereas UpKeep is a straightforward CMMS focusing on day-to-day task tracking and preventive maintenance. Which aligns better with your operational priorities?
Quore, with 65 reviews and recent activity, is the leading choice for hoteliers seeking a trusted, well-supported maintenance platform. UpKeep has no recent reviews or substantial hotel-specific ratings, making Quore the more dependable option for now.
Both products aim to streamline hotel maintenance, but Quore’s extensive feature set and proven track record make it more suitable for complex operations. While UpKeep excels in simple task management, it lacks hotel-specific integrations and recent user feedback. Do your hotel’s needs lean toward comprehensive management or basic task tracking?
If your hotel requires a platform that improves departmental communication, offers detailed record-keeping, and supports integration with other hotel systems, Quore is the best fit. Its high ratings (4.36/5 overall, 4.42/5 ease of use) and 65 reviews in the last six months demonstrate strong, recent user trust.
Conversely, if your team is looking for a straightforward, mobile-friendly CMMS without complex integrations or hotel-specific features, UpKeep might be enough. However, its lack of recent hotel reviews and zero verified integrations or hotel segment data suggest it’s less suitable for hotels needing reliable, proven tools.
Quore receives a 4.42/5 rating for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Its mobile app’s stability issues are noted but don't significantly hinder overall usability. UpKeep’s ease of use isn’t rated, but as a general-purpose CMMS, it’s designed for simplicity.
Edge: Quore.
Quore offers 7 shared features plus 3 exclusive ones, including CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting, Custom Inspections, and Pool Chemical Readings—tools essential for hotel maintenance. UpKeep, with no unique or hotel-specific features, lacks the depth seen in Quore’s offering.
Edge: Quore.
Quore boasts a support rating of 4.32/5 and recent reviews highlighting its responsive, helpful support team. Users appreciate its onboarding process, which scores 4.28/5, and mention that support helps ensure smooth implementation.
UpKeep has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to judge support quality. Based on current data, Quore clearly leads.
Edge: Quore.
Quore connects with 8 verified partners, including Zingle, Revinate, and Canary Technologies, enabling hotel-specific workflows. UpKeep has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to fit into the broader hotel tech ecosystem.
Edge: Quore.
With a 4.36/5 overall rating based on 65 recent reviews, Quore is clearly favored by hotel teams. Hoteliers appreciate its user-friendly design and comprehensive features, especially in larger or more complex properties.
UpKeep has no recent hotel-specific reviews or ratings, so hotelier satisfaction data is unavailable. Therefore, Quore is the superior-rated choice.
Edge: Quore.
Quore’s pricing starts at $200 per month with no free tier, and no implementation fees are required. UpKeep’s pricing isn’t publicly disclosed, and with no recent reviews, it’s uncertain if it offers comparable value or flexible plans.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Quore’s core advantage lies in its deep hotel-specific features, integrations, and proven recent use among hoteliers. Its 65 recent reviews and high ratings confirm its standing as a trusted choice for hotel maintenance management.
UpKeep, while simple and accessible, lacks recent hotel-specific feedback and integrations, making it a less reliable choice for hotels that need proven, scalable solutions.
Choose Quore if you need a feature-rich, well-supported platform that enhances departmental coordination and guest satisfaction. Opt for UpKeep only if your hotel’s maintenance needs are minimal, and you prioritize basic task management without complex integrations or hotel-specific tools.
In summary, for most hotels, especially those aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, Quore remains the recommended choice. Its recent user feedback and broad feature set provide confidence that your team can rely on it daily without surprises.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Quore 因其用户友好的界面而广受赞誉,让员工可以轻松学习和导航。这种简单性有助于团队成员更好地采用和使用,从而有助于提高运营效率。
用户对 Quore 维护工作订单、预防性维护和其他重要任务的详细记录的能力表示赞赏。此功能有助于追究责任,并可轻松访问历史数据,无需纸质记录。
Quore 改善了部门间的沟通,从而可以高效处理维护和客房服务任务。它有助于防止沟通不畅,并确保及时响应客人的要求。前台、客房服务和维护等部门受益于实时更新... Quore 改善了部门间的沟通,从而可以高效处理维护和客房服务任务。它有助于防止沟通不畅,并确保及时响应客人的要求。前台、客房服务和维护等部门受益于实时更新和简化的流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管 Quore 有诸多优势,但它在某些方面(例如自定义报告创建和工单管理)缺乏灵活性,因此受到批评。用户指出,需要更多自定义选项才能更好地满足其特定的运营... 尽管 Quore 有诸多优势,但它在某些方面(例如自定义报告创建和工单管理)缺乏灵活性,因此受到批评。用户指出,需要更多自定义选项才能更好地满足其特定的运营需求。
用户表示希望 Quore 能够更好地与其他物业管理系统 (PMS) 和工具集成。增强的集成功能将简化工作流程并提高整体系统效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Quore (Engineering) 和 UpKeep 共享许多核心 Hotel Maintenance Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Quore (Engineering) 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 UpKeep 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Quore (Engineering) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Quore (Engineering):否。UpKeep:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Maintenance Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Quore 的 HT Score 为 23,UpKeep 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问