项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,428 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 在日历和预订管理方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.6/5),并拥有综合支付处理以及预订绩效和进度报告等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 1,428 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 起价 $200/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,427 | 1 |
在分析了 1,428 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 日历和预订管理, 渠道分销与ota同步, 报告、分析和仪表盘,而 Hoteliers.com 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
日历和预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道分销与OTA同步
▾
|
|
|
+
报告、分析和仪表盘
▾
|
|
|
+
直订引擎与网站/数字化宾客互动
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持响应速度和人工服务
▾
|
|
|
−
支付、押金和账单/发票
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 675 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 179 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 48 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 4 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 566 条评价 | #46 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 230 条评价 | #41 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 117 条评价 | #34 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 99 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 441 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 188 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 342 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 15 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and RDX Channel Manager (Hoteliers.com) hinges on what your hotel needs most. Cloudbeds offers a broader, more integrated platform that connects your operations, revenue, and distribution, whereas Hoteliers.com specializes solely in simplifying distribution management through its extensive channel network. Where do your priorities lie: operational efficiency or focused channel distribution?
Both products aim to reduce manual work and prevent overbookings, but Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set and global presence make it more suited for properties seeking an all-in-one system. Will your hotel benefit from a unified platform or a specialized distribution tool?
Cloudbeds and Hoteliers.com address the core challenge of managing multiple distribution channels and avoiding overbooking. Cloudbeds integrates PMS, booking engine, and channel management into one platform, with real-time synchronization, automation, and analytics, allowing your team to streamline operations and improve decision-making. Hoteliers.com, by contrast, focuses exclusively on distribution, offering connections to over 450 channels, including GDS, and automation for rate management to optimize revenue.
While Cloudbeds’s comprehensive ecosystem supports diverse property types and scales globally, Hoteliers.com’s narrower focus may appeal if your hotel already has a PMS and just needs a robust distribution overlay. Do you require an all-in-one system or a dedicated channel management solution?
If your hotel needs an integrated platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and channel management to streamline daily operations, go with Cloudbeds. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, vacation rentals, and larger properties across multiple regions, supported by 1,062 reviews and a 99.8/100 score, making it a reliable choice for diverse hotel types.
If your primary goal is to optimize distribution channels through a straightforward, extensive network with automated rate controls, Hoteliers.com is a suitable pick. Its focus on distribution and 450+ channels appeal to properties looking to expand reach without overhauling existing management systems. Given the limited review data, Cloudbeds’s proven versatility makes it the stronger choice for most hoteliers.
Cloudbeds’s intuitive interface scores 4.6/5 based on user reviews, with many praising its straightforward setup and ease of training staff. Its onboarding process is rated 4.45/5, and users highlight its clean dashboards and automation tools that reduce daily workload.
Hoteliers.com offers a simple overview of distribution channels, with a user-friendly design rated 4.5/5. However, with no available detailed reviews, it’s harder to gauge user satisfaction with onboarding or daily usability. Overall, Cloudbeds’s broader adoption and detailed feedback suggest a marginal edge in ease of use.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides 17 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-lingual support, and integrated payment processing. These functionalities support comprehensive property management and revenue optimization, enabling your team to handle complex operations within one system.
Hoteliers.com’s core strength lies in managing 450+ distribution channels and automating rate adjustments, but it offers no additional features beyond distribution management. If your hotel values a complete platform with analytics and PMS integrations, Cloudbeds’s richer feature set clearly outshines.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a strong support reputation with a 4.41/5 rating, and reviews mention responsive, helpful service, though some note room for improvement during peak times. Customers appreciate the onboarding process and ongoing assistance, citing "seamless communication" as a key strength.
Hoteliers.com surpasses Cloudbeds with a perfect 5/5 customer support rating, with reviews emphasizing the exceptional support experience and ease of self-management. However, with only one recent review available, the limited feedback makes it difficult to definitively assess support quality.
Edge: Hoteliers.com.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integration partners, including popular PMS, booking engines, and revenue tools, with nine shared partners like SiteMinder and Duetto. Its extensive marketplace allows your team to customize and expand your tech stack significantly.
Hoteliers.com offers 18 verified partners, mainly focusing on distribution channels and GDS, with no shared or additional integrations listed. For properties seeking a flexible, interconnected system, Cloudbeds’s broad ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.64/5 is supported by 1,062 reviews, with recent feedback from 74 hotels in the last six months. Hotels across segments like boutique, hostel, and vacation rentals rate it highly, praising its functionality and scalability.
Hoteliers.com has only a single review, giving it a perfect 5/5 rating. While this indicates satisfaction, the limited data makes it difficult to gauge broader hotel segment preferences.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Cloudbeds’s higher rating and extensive feedback give it the edge in user credibility.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Both systems are priced at a base rate of $200 per month, with no mention of additional implementation fees, freemium options, or per-room charges. Neither platform offers a free trial, so your team should consider the value proposition relative to your operational needs.
While pricing is comparable, Cloudbeds’s broader feature set and global support typically justify its cost for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily seeks a lightweight, standalone distribution tool without additional management features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires an all-in-one platform or advanced analytics, as Hoteliers.com does not offer these features.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, well-rated platform that integrates PMS, revenue management, and channel distribution, favored by diverse property types worldwide. Its extensive features, integrations, and recent reviews make it the dependable choice for hotels seeking to streamline operations and grow globally.
Hoteliers.com excels in its niche—distribution management with a broad network of channels and stellar customer support. It’s best suited for hotels that already manage their operations separately and need a reliable system solely for distribution.
If your hotel values an all-in-one management system with extensive automation and analytics, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. For properties that want a focused, distribution-centric tool with top-tier support, Hoteliers.com can meet your needs, but with less flexibility and fewer features.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers, Cloudbeds’s more recent reviews, higher overall ratings, and broader feature set make it the stronger choice to support growth and operational efficiency.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 起价 $200/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
日历被反复描述为前台团队的核心日常工作工具,因为它使查看房态、移动预订、调整日期以及管理入住/退房变得简单。用户喜欢它简化了预订处理和房间锁定,尽管有... 日历被反复描述为前台团队的核心日常工作工具,因为它使查看房态、移动预订、调整日期以及管理入住/退房变得简单。用户喜欢它简化了预订处理和房间锁定,尽管有些用户希望分段住宿、换房、备注和编辑功能更加顺畅且减少错误。
评论者最常赞扬Cloudbeds能够从一个平台同步各OTA的价格、可用性和预订情况。这减少了手动更新,降低了超额预订风险,并节省了员工在多个外联网之间切换的时间。... 评论者最常赞扬Cloudbeds能够从一个平台同步各OTA的价格、可用性和预订情况。这减少了手动更新,降低了超额预订风险,并节省了员工在多个外联网之间切换的时间。少数评论提到在更新待处理时偶尔会出现同步延迟或可见性问题。
许多评价者重视Cloudbeds的报告功能,因为它帮助他们跟踪入住率、收入、关键绩效指标(KPI)以及各渠道的表现。然而,用户持续要求提供更多可定制、互动性更强且... 许多评价者重视Cloudbeds的报告功能,因为它帮助他们跟踪入住率、收入、关键绩效指标(KPI)以及各渠道的表现。然而,用户持续要求提供更多可定制、互动性更强且更快速的报告,特别是在收入管理、财务分析和酒店特定视图方面。有几位提到当前的报告虽然有用,但搜索起来较困难,下载速度慢,或者过于类似电子表格。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
支持是评论中的主要关注点:一些用户赞扬快速的聊天帮助、入职指导和知识资源,而另一些用户则强烈批评邮件回复延迟和以聊天机器人为主的工作流程。最常见的抱怨... 支持是评论中的主要关注点:一些用户赞扬快速的聊天帮助、入职指导和知识资源,而另一些用户则强烈批评邮件回复延迟和以聊天机器人为主的工作流程。最常见的抱怨是缺乏针对紧急运营问题的即时电话支持,酒店认为系统故障时这直接影响客人服务和收入。较小的一部分用户则赞赏响应迅速、专业的客服人员和扎实的实施支持。
Cloudbeds 因其集成支付、押金收取以及在工作流程中直接处理费用的能力而受到重视。这有助于酒店确保预订,加快入住流程,并保持支付数据与预订的关联。但一些评... Cloudbeds 因其集成支付、押金收取以及在工作流程中直接处理费用的能力而受到重视。这有助于酒店确保预订,加快入住流程,并保持支付数据与预订的关联。但一些评价者希望加强本地账单/税务支持,改进发票处理,增加更多支付处理器选项,以及实现更顺畅的支付设置。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager 和 RDX Channel Manager (Hoteliers.com) 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager 提供 208 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RDX Channel Manager (Hoteliers.com) 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager:否。RDX Channel Manager (Hoteliers.com):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 98,Hoteliers.com 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐