项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 288 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Reguest 在性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.9/5)。
Smart Host GmbH 在支持与入职方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.7/5),并拥有营销自动化以及客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论)等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 288 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $700/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 39 | 249 |
在分析了 288 条经验证的评价后,Reguest 用户最看重其 易用性和员工效率, 支持与供应商响应速度, 自动化与人工智能/聊天机器人辅助,而 Smart Host GmbH 用户则强调 支持与入职, 活动和新闻通讯创建, 自动化客人沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和员工效率
▾
|
+
支持与入职
▾
|
|
+
支持与供应商响应速度
▾
|
+
活动和新闻通讯创建
▾
|
|
+
自动化与人工智能/聊天机器人辅助
▾
|
+
自动化客人沟通
▾
|
|
+
客人沟通集中化
▾
|
+
分析、追踪与报告
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
配置复杂性和可用性差距
▾
|
−
工作流程限制和缺失功能
▾
|
|
−
工作流程覆盖的功能需求
▾
|
−
优惠管理和优惠创建
▾
|
|
−
集成与数据交换
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | #1 109 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #12 15 条评价 | #3 121 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #21 2 条评价 | #11 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #33 0 条评价 | #23 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 16 条评价 | #2 102 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #14 10 条评价 | #4 78 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 4 条评价 | #5 47 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #2 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #31 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 36 条评价 | #2 244 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #19 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 1 条评价 |
ReGuest and Smart Host both serve hotels by centralizing guest data and automating communication to boost direct bookings and guest loyalty. They diverge primarily in feature depth and market focus. Smart Host offers advanced segmentation, marketing automation, A/B testing, and a guest feedback module—features missing in ReGuest—making it better suited for hotels prioritizing data-driven marketing and guest insights. ReGuest excels in AI-driven guest communication and omnichannel messaging, fitting hotels seeking streamlined direct guest interaction with less complexity.
Both systems solve the core problem of managing guest relationships and marketing in an era where personalized communication drives revenue. They automate pre-stay, in-stay, and post-stay messaging, reducing manual front-desk workload and improving marketing effectiveness. However, Smart Host’s broader feature set caters to hotels aiming for granular campaign control and feedback integration, while ReGuest focuses on AI-assisted communication efficiency.
If your property is a boutique or luxury hotel, ReGuest’s 4.9+ segment ratings across boutique (16 reviews), luxury (10 reviews), and resorts (7 reviews) indicate strong satisfaction with its AI communication and ease of use. Its omnichannel inbox and chatbot reduce front-desk messaging workload, supporting personalized guest journeys.
If you operate multiple small-to-medium hotels in Europe, particularly with a need for advanced marketing automation and segmentation, Smart Host’s 249 reviews and 4.6 overall rating demonstrate broad adoption and balanced performance. Its unique guest feedback module and A/B testing support data-driven marketing campaigns proven to increase direct bookings, as seen in case studies like Lerch Genusswelten generating €7.06 million in revenue.
Data on extended stay and serviced apartments favors ReGuest (4.9/5, 7 reviews), while Smart Host’s strength in resorts (4.6/5, 73 reviews) and mixed-use portfolios suggests a fit for properties needing robust campaign management and guest feedback.
If precise segmentation, automated campaign workflows, and survey tools are priorities and you can invest the time for training due to feature complexity, choose Smart Host. If you want a straightforward, AI-enhanced communication tool with a highly rated support team and less complexity, ReGuest fits better. Where segment data is slim—such as vacation rentals—both have limited but positive reviews, so operator preference and integration needs should guide choice.
ReGuest scores 4.8/5 in ease of use and 4.8/5 in onboarding from 39 reviews, while Smart Host has 4.7/5 ease of use and 4.6/5 onboarding from 249 reviews. Both products have high customer support ratings of 4.9/5. ReGuest users highlight an intuitive newsletter editor and simple AI chatbot for quick guest messaging, easing front desk adoption. Some mention the settings interface could be less complex, suggesting a minor learning curve on advanced configurations.
Smart Host users praise the intuitive UI/UX and clear guidance within the system that reduces training time, though reviewers note its rich feature set sometimes requires continuous training and adjustment. Several mention fast loading speeds and easy campaign creation as usability strengths.
Both products support front-desk and marketing teams well, with ReGuest slightly favored for faster adoption in smaller teams due to simpler workflows, and Smart Host valued for comprehensive control despite a steeper learning curve.
Edge: Even.
Smart Host leads with five hotel-specific features that ReGuest lacks: segmentation, marketing automation, guest feedback module, A/B testing, and CCPA compliance. Segmentation allows targeting guest groups based on preferences, enhancing campaign relevance. Marketing automation triggers personalized messages based on guest data without manual input, reducing staff effort. The guest feedback module collects real-time reviews and comments, improving service recovery and satisfaction measurement. A/B testing lets hotels optimize email campaigns by comparing variations, increasing effectiveness.
ReGuest’s feature set focuses on AI-powered communication with an omnichannel inbox combining chat, WhatsApp, and email, plus an AI chatbot automating guest interactions, which Smart Host does not offer. This reduces front-desk workload by automating live guest conversations and quick quote preparation.
Both products share 24 features related to guest data management, campaign creation, and reporting, but Smart Host’s unique features provide a clear operational advantage in marketing sophistication and guest feedback collection.
Edge: Smart Host.
Both platforms score identically high with 4.9/5 in customer support and strong onboarding (ReGuest 4.8/5, Smart Host 4.6/5). ReGuest reviewers frequently mention fast, reliable, and competent support enabling smooth adoption and ongoing assistance, fostering a valued partnership. One user noted the support is always available and happy to help, which eases operational challenges.
Smart Host users describe support as friendly, competent, and proactive, highlighting timely problem resolution and personal collaboration. Several case studies credit Smart Host’s support for enabling successful implementation and continued product development aligned with customer needs.
Both vendor teams clearly prioritize customer success, with no significant performance differences in support quality reflected in reviews.
Edge: Even.
Smart Host connects with 26 verified partners, surpassing ReGuest’s 21 by about 24%, qualifying for an integrations edge. They share 10 major integrations, including Mews, Seekda, Planet, and Oracle Hospitality. Smart Host’s unique integrations with apaleo, RateBoard, protel, SuitePad, and Elite Solutions support hotels using popular PMS and revenue management tools in Europe, enhancing data centralization and workflow automation.
ReGuest’s exclusive integrations with FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, Vertical Booking, vioma, and Stayntouch target more specialized tech stacks and contactless access, benefiting hotels leveraging these systems for enhanced guest experiences.
Hotels heavily invested in the European PMS ecosystem may find Smart Host’s broader integrations more convenient. Properties prioritizing AI-driven communication combined with selected access control or guest experience platforms may prefer ReGuest’s integration portfolio.
Edge: Smart Host.
ReGuest holds a slightly higher overall rating at 4.8/5 from 39 reviews versus Smart Host’s 4.6/5 from 249 reviews. Recent reviews maintain this pattern: ReGuest’s last six months rating is 4.9/5 (11 reviews), and Smart Host’s is stable at 4.6/5 (25 reviews). Though Smart Host has six times the review volume, ReGuest’s consistently higher scores indicate strong satisfaction where it is used.
Segment ratings show ReGuest excels in boutique hotels (4.9/5, 16 reviews), extended stay (4.9/5, 7 reviews), and luxury hotels (4.9/5, 10 reviews). Smart Host leads in resorts (4.6/5, 73 reviews) and has broader adoption in small and medium properties with large review counts.
Both products score well with limited service and branded hotels, but ReGuest’s higher segment ratings with less volume suggest deeper satisfaction. Smart Host’s volume and steady ratings indicate reliability and satisfaction across a wider user base.
Edge: Even.
ReGuest does not publish pricing and has no trial or freemium options listed. This suggests custom pricing based on property size or needs, requiring direct vendor contact for quotes.
Smart Host states a base price of $700, with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing. No implementation fees or trials are offered. This upfront pricing can help hotels budget easily but may be a barrier for smaller properties.
Without comparable pricing models, direct cost comparison is not possible. Hotels must inquire about total cost of ownership, including onboarding, customization, and ongoing fees.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ReGuest and Smart Host both improve hotel guest communication and marketing but differ in operational focus. ReGuest emphasizes AI-powered guest messaging, omnichannel communication, and ease of use, fitting boutique and luxury hotels prioritizing personalized interaction and quick staff adoption. Smart Host offers advanced segmentation, marketing automation, guest feedback, and A/B testing, suiting properties seeking data-driven marketing and comprehensive campaign management.
Choose ReGuest if you want AI-assisted chat and omnichannel inbox features that streamline daily guest communications, with high ratings in luxury and boutique segments and a strong support partner. Choose Smart Host if your hotel needs granular audience segmentation, automated campaign workflows, and integrated guest feedback, supported by a broader integration ecosystem and robust analytics, especially in resort or multi-property contexts.
The decision hinges on your hotel's marketing sophistication, integration needs, and team capacity for training. ReGuest streamlines personalized communication with AI, while Smart Host empowers advanced marketing and feedback strategies for measurable booking growth.
酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $700/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
营销自动化
|
|
|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| A/B 测试 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
|
▾
模板生成器
|
|
|
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 营销活动模板 | ||
| 事务模板 | ||
| 模板导入 | ||
|
▾
客人资料
|
|
|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 自动重复数据删除 | ||
|
▾
分割
|
|
|
| 分割 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 忠诚度细分 | ||
| 基于属性的细分 | ||
| 基于地理的细分 | ||
| 基于渠道/市场的细分 | ||
| 基于交付周期的细分 | ||
| 基于房间类型的细分 | ||
|
▾
隐私与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| PCI 投诉 | ||
|
▾
数据管理
|
|
|
| 集中式数据仓库 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
|
▾
反馈和调查
|
|
|
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We feel good with Smart Host"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are very satisfied with Smart Host, as we can now finally address our guests even more individually and create campaigns tailored to their needs. Our aim was to launch several c..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We save a lot of time and that is the most precious thing you have!"
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一个常见的主题是Re:Guest界面直观,易于学习,使接待和日常酒店工作更快捷。评论者表示它减少了手工操作,降低了出错几率,并使员工能够更多地专注于宾客服务。
大多数评价者称赞Re:Guest的支持团队反应迅速、乐于助人且友好,并指出公司持续改进产品。这种响应速度增强了对问题和功能请求能被快速处理的信心。
许多评价提到自动化是主要的价值驱动力,尤其是在加快日常工作和更高效地处理宾客对话方面。聊天机器人被认为有用,但有多位用户希望拥有更智能、更灵活的人工智... 许多评价提到自动化是主要的价值驱动力,尤其是在加快日常工作和更高效地处理宾客对话方面。聊天机器人被认为有用,但有多位用户希望拥有更智能、更灵活的人工智能,以及涵盖电子邮件和电话工作流程的更广泛自动化。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些评论者指出设置混乱、文本管理分散,以及需要经过多个步骤才能看到更改生效。他们希望有更清晰的工作流程、更好的预览工具,以及随着产品功能增长更简化的组... 一些评论者指出设置混乱、文本管理分散,以及需要经过多个步骤才能看到更改生效。他们希望有更清晰的工作流程、更好的预览工具,以及随着产品功能增长更简化的组织方式。
许多评价要求更广泛的工作流程覆盖,特别是更强大的入住后评价管理、更便捷的预订修改,以及支持预订请求之外的客人。这些评论表明用户希望 Re:Guest 能覆盖更多... 许多评价要求更广泛的工作流程覆盖,特别是更强大的入住后评价管理、更便捷的预订修改,以及支持预订请求之外的客人。这些评论表明用户希望 Re:Guest 能覆盖更多的客人生命周期的各个环节。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持是Smart Host中最一贯受到赞扬的方面之一,评论者描述团队为快速、可靠、称职且积极主动。良好的入职培训和响应迅速的账户管理被视为帮助酒店采用平台并快速... 支持是Smart Host中最一贯受到赞扬的方面之一,评论者描述团队为快速、可靠、称职且积极主动。良好的入职培训和响应迅速的账户管理被视为帮助酒店采用平台并快速获得价值的重要因素。
许多用户称赞创建、发送和管理新闻通讯及活动的便捷性,特别是对于希望快速执行且无需技术努力的酒店。他们还提到,该工具帮助他们制作更专业的沟通,有时还能提... 许多用户称赞创建、发送和管理新闻通讯及活动的便捷性,特别是对于希望快速执行且无需技术努力的酒店。他们还提到,该工具帮助他们制作更专业的沟通,有时还能提高点击率和预订表现。
用户经常表示智能接待自动化了预订前、住宿后和新闻通讯的消息传递,节省了员工时间,并使客人沟通更加一致。他们认为自动化有助于酒店更快地响应、减少手动工作... 用户经常表示智能接待自动化了预订前、住宿后和新闻通讯的消息传递,节省了员工时间,并使客人沟通更加一致。他们认为自动化有助于酒店更快地响应、减少手动工作,并在不增加运营负担的情况下让客人保持知情。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一个反复出现的主题是,一些核心的酒店工作流程仍然存在缺失或不完善的功能,尤其是在在线入住、数据录入、押金、附加服务、团体管理和客人筛选方面。评审者普遍... 一个反复出现的主题是,一些核心的酒店工作流程仍然存在缺失或不完善的功能,尤其是在在线入住、数据录入、押金、附加服务、团体管理和客人筛选方面。评审者普遍认为Smart Host表现出色,但这些差距可能会减慢运营速度或迫使酒店继续使用其他系统完成某些任务。
优惠管理器被反复描述为创建专业客人优惠和高效管理询价的强大功能。然而,多个评论指出在团体优惠、多房间报价、最低入住天数覆盖以及酒店特定工作流程方面存在... 优惠管理器被反复描述为创建专业客人优惠和高效管理询价的强大功能。然而,多个评论指出在团体优惠、多房间报价、最低入住天数覆盖以及酒店特定工作流程方面存在限制,显示此功能强大但仍需完善。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ReGuest Hotel CRM 和 Smart Host CRM 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。ReGuest Hotel CRM 提供 21 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Smart Host CRM 提供 26 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。ReGuest Hotel CRM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ReGuest Hotel CRM:否。Smart Host CRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Reguest 的 HT Score 为 84,Smart Host GmbH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐