The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
About Hotelier 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 887 | 0 |
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 About Hotelier 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
About Hotelier |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
About Hotelier |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
About Hotelier |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
About Hotelier |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and RoomRack by About Hotelier hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scalability, and the importance of recent user feedback. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, offers a proven track record of supporting diverse hotel types with a focus on automation and integrations. RoomRack, however, lacks publicly available reviews and ratings, making Mews the clearly more established choice for hoteliers seeking reliability.
Both products aim to streamline reservations, billing, and guest management, but Mews emphasizes extensive integrations, automation, and scalability, while RoomRack positions itself as a simple, real-time management platform. Are you looking for a mature, well-reviewed solution with proven results? Or a less tested platform that might suit smaller operations? Let’s explore further.
Mews and RoomRack both serve to simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s extensive review count and recent positive feedback give it a distinct advantage in demonstrating reliability and user satisfaction. Mews’s reviews highlight its flexibility, automation features, and integration ecosystem, supporting hotels of all sizes across multiple regions.
RoomRack provides basic centralization of guest info and reservations, with a focus on efficiency and real-time updates, but it lacks the review volume and recent feedback that give Mews a stronger foundation. Given the data, does your hotel prioritize a proven platform with broad industry validation? If so, Mews is the clearer choice.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, automation, and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its broad user base includes boutique, city center, and larger chain hotels, with a strong presence in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
If your hotel prefers a lightweight, straightforward system with basic reservation and housekeeping management and you’re a smaller operation with limited tech requirements, RoomRack could suffice. However, the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature depth makes Mews the safer, more trusted option for most hotels seeking growth and operational excellence.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating, supported by 98 recent reviews, and is praised for its modern, intuitive interface that many users find quick to adopt. Its onboarding process is rated 4.39/5, and support is generally responsive, with many reviewers emphasizing how straightforward the platform is to implement.
RoomRack’s ease of use is not well-documented publicly, and with no recent reviews, it’s difficult to gauge how new users navigate the system or how onboarding and support compare. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, automation tools, online check-in, and a vast marketplace of over 336 verified integrations. These features support a comprehensive hotel ecosystem that adapts to complex operational needs.
RoomRack’s feature set appears more limited, focusing on core reservation management, basic billing, and housekeeping scheduling, with no detailed feature count or advanced modules publicly listed. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5 based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Many testimonials underscore the value of their dedicated customer success team and real-time support channels.
RoomRack offers limited publicly available support feedback, and without recent reviews or ratings, it’s impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s established reputation, the support edge clearly goes to Mews.
Mews’s marketplace features over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, revenue tools, POS, and more, allowing extensive customization of your tech stack. This suite of integrations enables hotels to automate and connect their entire operation smoothly.
RoomRack has no publicly listed integrations or partner counts, suggesting a more closed or limited ecosystem. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—show an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments such as boutique, independent, and city center hotels rate it highly, praising its ease of use, automation, and support.
In contrast, RoomRack lacks recent or any publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback. For hoteliers seeking validation from peers, Mews’s ratings hold decisive weight. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. The cost structure suggests a mid-range investment geared toward hotels wanting a comprehensive platform.
RoomRack’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, which could mean customized quotes or less transparency. Given Mews’s transparent pricing model and proven ROI, it provides better clarity for budget planning.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal tech needs, or prefers a simple, no-frills system without the requirement for extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for growth, multi-property management, or advanced automation, as the platform’s capabilities and reviews are limited.
Mews delivers a mature, feature-rich platform supported by a large, recent user base and extensive reviews. Its automation, integrations, and scalability make it ideal for hotels aiming to grow and optimize operations.
Choose Mews if your hotel seeks proven reliability, a broad ecosystem of integrations, and a platform that supports future expansion. Its high ratings and recent reviews confirm it’s trusted and valued by a wide range of property types.
RoomRack may suit very small or budget-conscious hotels needing basic management tools, but its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and unverified support reputation make it less suitable for hotels seeking stability and growth.
In summary, if you want a platform backed by strong peer validation, a rich feature set, and proven results, Mews is your best choice. If your hotel’s needs are very minimal and you’re comfortable with limited data, RoomRack might suffice, but it’s a gamble without the recent positive feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
About Hotelier | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mews PMS 和 RoomRack 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
About Hotelier |
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 RoomRack 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRack 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。RoomRack:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,About Hotelier 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问