项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 30 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
VISIT 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合精品住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有自动报告以及入住前电子邮件等独家功能。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 7 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #33 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #32 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #34 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #15 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 1 条评价 |
Choosing between RoomStay and VISIT for your hotel’s booking engine requires understanding how each platform addresses your specific needs. Both aim to boost direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in features, ease of use, and market presence. While RoomStay offers a straightforward, simplified solution, VISIT packs a broad array of functionalities and integrations. Which one aligns better with your hotel's priorities?
Are you seeking a lean, easy-to-implement system or a feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations? Let's compare these two options to see which is the better fit for your hotel.
RoomStay and VISIT are designed to enhance direct booking capabilities, but their approaches differ. RoomStay is a newer, less reviewed product with a minimal feature set and no recent reviews, indicating limited market traction or maturity. VISIT, on the other hand, has accumulated 28 reviews in the last six months, boasting a 5/5 rating and a near-perfect NPS score of 9.82, reflecting high customer satisfaction.
VISIT’s extensive feature set includes modules for wedding bookings, package management, automated reporting, multi-currency, and more—features absent in RoomStay. Conversely, RoomStay’s appeal lies in its focus on personalization and e-commerce optimization, though it lacks advanced functionalities and broad integrations. Given the limited recent data on RoomStay, can you rely on its promise of boosting direct bookings without more proven support?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, quick-to-deploy booking engine with a focus on increasing direct reservations, RoomStay might seem attractive. However, with no recent reviews and a low rating, its proven effectiveness is questionable. VISIT suits hotels that require a versatile platform with extensive features like channel management, email campaigns, and multi-lingual support—making it ideal for larger, multi-property, or more complex operations.
If your hotel prioritizes a highly customizable, well-supported system with proven customer satisfaction, VISIT is the clear choice. For small boutique hotels or properties aiming for simplicity, RoomStay could be tempting, but the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence.
VISIT earns a near-perfect ease of use rating at 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, straightforward navigation, and excellent customer support rated at 4.93/5. Many users find VISIT easy to integrate with their websites and PMS, praising its mobile-friendly design and helpful onboarding process.
RoomStay, however, has no published ease of use rating, and its minimal review presence suggests limited user feedback. Without recent customer reviews, it's difficult to assess how intuitive or user-friendly the platform truly is.
Edge: VISIT.
VISIT boasts 38 unique features, including booking abandonment recapture, multi-currency support, social media integrations, gift cards, rate plan comparisons, and A/B testing—features that allow for comprehensive marketing, upselling, and operational flexibility. RoomStay offers only 2 shared features with VISIT and no exclusive features, indicating a limited scope.
The extensive feature set of VISIT makes it suitable for hotels seeking deep customization and operational control. RoomStay's minimal feature offering suggests a narrower focus, likely insufficient for hotels needing advanced functionalities.
Edge: VISIT.
VISIT is rated at 4.93/5 for customer support, with reviewers highlighting quick responses, attentive service, and ongoing support as key strengths. Many praise the team for making onboarding smooth and being available for troubleshooting.
RoomStay has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its customer support quality. Given the importance of support in SaaS adoption and ongoing success, the absence of recent positive feedback on RoomStay raises concerns.
Edge: VISIT.
VISIT connects with 19 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Yanolja Cloud, offering broad compatibility with PMS and OTA channels. RoomStay, with only 7 verified integrations, has fewer options, including key partners like SiteMinder and Oracle but lacking in others like Mews or Yanolja.
For hotels that rely on diverse platforms and require seamless connectivity, VISIT’s larger integration network is a significant advantage. RoomStay may struggle to meet more complex or multi-channel needs.
Edge: VISIT.
VISIT's recent reviews consistently rate it 5/5, with high marks from hotels across segments such as boutique, resort, and city center properties. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, support, and feature richness, indicating strong satisfaction among active users.
RoomStay has no recent reviews, and its overall rating remains unverified. The absence of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its performance and support.
Edge: VISIT.
RoomStay does not publicly disclose pricing, suggesting it might be customized or unavailable for general review. VISIT charges $800 per month, with no mention of discounts or tiered pricing, making it a straightforward, predictable investment.
While RoomStay's unclear pricing might appeal to some, the lack of transparency and recent reviews makes it difficult to assess value. VISIT’s transparent pricing aligns with its proven feature set and support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, multi-channel support, or integration with complex PMS systems.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, no-frills booking engine or has minimal online booking volume.
RoomStay presents a lightweight, direct booking-focused platform suitable for hotels seeking quick results with minimal complexity. Its very limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less reliable, especially for properties with more advanced needs.
VISIT, however, offers an all-in-one platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction. It’s the clear choice for hotels that want a flexible, integrable, and well-supported booking engine capable of scaling with their operations.
If your hotel values a mature, feature-rich solution supported by excellent customer service, go with VISIT. For small properties or those just starting out, RoomStay might suffice, but the lack of recent data warrants caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively seeking a reliable, well-supported booking engine with recent customer validation, VISIT stands out as the superior choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
BookVisit 的支持团队经常因响应迅速和乐于助人而受到称赞。用户对持续的开发和更新表示赞赏,但有些人认为,响应速度更快和指南更完善还有待改进。
该平台的易用性显著提升了客人体验,从而提高了转化率。其用户友好的界面受到客人和管理员的一致好评。不过,有些人认为移动界面和票务管理还有改进空间。
与 PMS 系统和各种 OTA 渠道的集成备受推崇,可简化操作。关键是,一些用户希望更好地与特定系统集成,例如餐桌预订和 SPA 管理。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
BookVisit 提供了良好的统计和收入管理工具,但用户建议实施更多动态定价功能以简化房间类型和入住率管理。
用户对后台预订管理和分析功能表示赞赏,认为这些功能有助于日常运营。但是,他们呼吁改进价格管理系统,并简化复杂预订变更的导航。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Roomstay 和 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Roomstay 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Roomstay:否。VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomStay 的 HT Score 为 0,VISIT 的为 23。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐