The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 手机点餐和客房送餐服务 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 18 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 27 条评价 | #12 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 25 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 51 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 79 条评价 | #14 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | #9 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 32 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 66 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Duve Mobile Ordering by Duve and F&B by SmartStay by Liverton hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest communication and food & beverage services. Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction but approach these goals differently. Duve offers a comprehensive, feature-rich solution with a large global footprint and extensive integrations, while Liverton’s platform emphasizes simplicity, customization, and a focus on F&B automation. Your decision should consider your hotel’s size, technological maturity, and strategic priorities.
Duve and Liverton both solve the challenge of streamlining guest ordering and communication, but they diverge in scope and flexibility. Duve’s offering includes integrated guest messaging, online check-in, upselling, and numerous digital engagement features, supported by its high review count and recent positive feedback. Liverton concentrates on contactless F&B ordering via QR codes, with a straightforward interface and a focus on operational efficiency. Do you need a broad guest engagement platform or a specialized F&B solution?
Duve’s reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, particularly among upscale hotels and large portfolios, with recent reviews confirming its ongoing value. Conversely, Liverton’s fewer reviews and lack of recent feedback make its current market impact less clear. While Liverton emphasizes ease of use and customization, Duve’s extensive feature set and proven results in upselling and guest engagement make it a more mature choice. Are you looking for a versatile platform or a dedicated F&B tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest communication platform that integrates with your PMS, supports pre-arrival to post-stay engagement, and offers multiple revenue-generating features, go with Duve. Its large review base, high ratings, and extensive partner network make it ideal for hotels looking to enhance overall guest experience and operational efficiency.
If your primary goal is to simplify F&B ordering through QR codes and increase food & beverage sales without investing in broader guest management, Liverton is the better fit. Its focus on contactless, app-less ordering and straightforward integration with POS and PMS systems suits hotels prioritizing operational efficiency in food service.
For properties seeking a multi-functional platform with proven ROI and digital engagement, Duve is the clear choice. Meanwhile, Liverton caters well to hotels focusing solely on streamlining F&B delivery with minimal complexity.
Duve boasts an impressive user rating of 4.7/5, underpinned by a review count of 93, with recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface and ease of onboarding. Guests find the app and platform straightforward, with staff adoption rates bolstered by comprehensive onboarding and support.
Liverton scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, but lacks the same volume of recent reviews that confirm sustained usability. Its platform emphasizes customization and simple QR code access, making it approachable for staff and guests alike.
Edge: Duve.
Duve offers an impressive 17 unique features, including white-label apps, multi-menu ordering, loyalty integrations, contactless ordering, and extensive PMS and POS integrations. Its features support a full guest journey, from pre-arrival upsell to post-stay feedback, with tools designed to boost revenue and operational efficiency.
Liverton’s platform focuses on core F&B functionalities, notably QR code-based mobile ordering, direct payments, and guest recognition linked to PMS systems. It does not provide the broad feature set or upselling tools available in Duve.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s support ratings are slightly higher, with a 4.61/5 score and recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Hoteliers appreciate the quick onboarding and ongoing assistance, emphasizing the proactive support team.
Liverton scores 4/5, with positive comments on responsiveness but less extensive recent feedback. Support is generally strong, though some reviews note room for improvement in after-hours assistance.
Edge: Duve.
Duve boasts 65 verified integrations, including major PMS, POS, and booking platforms like Mews, Oracle, and Cloudbeds, providing broader compatibility. Liverton offers 8 verified integrations, primarily with PMS and POS systems, limiting potential for extensive third-party connections.
Shared integrations include RMS, Oracle, Mews, Cloudbeds, and SIHOT, but Duve’s larger ecosystem supports more complex, multi-channel operations.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s reviews, with a recent score of 9.24/5 and 93 reviews, reflect strong satisfaction, especially among large, multi-property hotels and upscale brands. Its new reviews continue to affirm its value, with a 95% likelihood to recommend.
Liverton, with only 1 review and an older score, lacks recent data for comparison. Given Duve’s review volume and current ratings, it clearly holds the higher reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s pricing is straightforward at $800 monthly, with no hidden fees, implementation costs, or freemium options. Liverton’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, making direct comparison difficult; no trial or transparent fee structure is available.
This transparency favors Duve, especially for hotels seeking predictable budgeting.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Duve provides a broad, feature-rich guest engagement platform that supports operational automation, guest communication, upselling, and data insights. Its extensive integrations and proven results in diverse hotel segments make it suitable for large, upscale, or multi-property hotels aiming for a holistic guest experience.
Liverton’s focus is narrowly on contactless F&B ordering via QR codes, making it ideal for hotels that want a simple, effective solution to increase food & beverage revenue with minimal complexity. Its streamlined, app-less approach appeals to hotels seeking operational efficiency in food service but offers limited broader guest engagement capabilities.
Choose Duve if you want a comprehensive digital platform that enhances every aspect of the guest journey. Opt for Liverton if your priority is boosting F&B sales through quick, contactless, and easy-to-use ordering without the need for extensive digital marketing or guest communication tools.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"While scaling up and growing in terms of more hotel rooms and more hotels in different countries we found it difficult to communicate with our guests in a very personal way. Duve f..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管整体沟通被认为实用且高效,但部分用户指出订单履行流程效率低下。建议将配套设施订单直接与供应商对接,以提高服务速度和准确性,从而避免依赖后台部门的沟... 尽管整体沟通被认为实用且高效,但部分用户指出订单履行流程效率低下。建议将配套设施订单直接与供应商对接,以提高服务速度和准确性,从而避免依赖后台部门的沟通。
用户尤其喜欢二维码菜单和手机点餐的便捷性,尤其是在人手有限的大型场所。这项功能让顾客可以直接在座位或躺椅等位置下单,从而提高服务效率和顾客满意度。
该平台能够根据客人资料推荐附加服务,这被认为是一项显著的收入增长点。这项功能不仅通过提供个性化推荐提升客人体验,还能通过有效的追加销售提高酒店的整体收... 该平台能够根据客人资料推荐附加服务,这被认为是一项显著的收入增长点。这项功能不仅通过提供个性化推荐提升客人体验,还能通过有效的追加销售提高酒店的整体收入。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Duve Mobile Ordering 和 F&B by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 功能,但各有独特的能力。Duve Mobile Ordering 提供 65 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 F&B by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。F&B by SmartStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Duve Mobile Ordering:否。F&B by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Duve 的 HT Score 为 100,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问