The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 Softstar 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Mews PMS stands out with its extensive reviews, recent updates, and broad industry adoption, while Softstar’s offerings remain less documented and review-deficient. Do you want a proven, highly-rated solution with a large user base or a less established platform? The clear answer is in the reviews and recent data.
Mews PMS functions as a cloud-based operating system tailored for modern hotels, offering over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a rating of 4.62/5. Softstar’s review count is nonexistent, and it provides no recent user feedback, making it difficult to gauge real-world performance. Mews’s recent reviews showcase a high level of satisfaction, with a Likelihood to Recommend of 93%, whereas Softstar lacks such data altogether.
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience. Softstar’s focus, by contrast, appears more aligned with property management for rentals rather than full-service hotels. Is your goal operational automation and guest experience? If so, Mews’s robust review-backed performance clearly outpaces Softstar’s unverified claims.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly-rated PMS with proven scalability—especially if you operate multiple properties or require extensive integrations—go with Mews. It offers 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and automated housekeeping modules, supported by over 336 verified partners.
Conversely, Softstar might be suitable if your focus is on rental or property management automation, especially if your operation is small or in a niche where detailed tenant and maintenance tracking is key. But without recent reviews or a clear feature set, it’s hard to justify choosing Softstar over the extensively vetted Mews.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by a substantial review count (758, with 98 in the last six months). Users praise its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training, with many noting how quickly they adopted the system—“Mews is the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” says one reviewer.
Softstar’s user-friendliness is undocumented, with no recent reviews or ratings available. This absence suggests a lack of user feedback, which complicates assessing its ease of use.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, digital registration, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and a comprehensive booking engine. It also provides advanced modules like guest messaging, automated reminders, online check-in/out, and centralized user management.
Softstar’s feature list remains undisclosed and lacks comparable depth or detail. Given the extensive functionality and proven integrations, Mews clearly leads in feature richness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is generally rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews emphasizing their responsiveness and effective issue resolution. Users say, “Their support team sets new standards,” and appreciate the onboarding experience, especially during implementation. Some reviews note occasional bugs but rapid resolutions.
Softstar offers no recent reviews, support ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to evaluate service quality. The absence of user testimonials or ratings favors Mews’s established support reputation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and expansive Mews Marketplace enable seamless connectivity across a broad spectrum of third-party solutions, enhancing operational flexibility.
In contrast, Softstar has no verified integrations listed, limiting its adaptability. For a hotel seeking a flexible, interconnected tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating is backed by 758 reviews, with recent feedback from diverse hotel segments—boutiques, hostels, city hotels—highlighting its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels like Cresta Palace and The Neighborhood Hotel praise its connectivity and operational efficiencies, reinforcing its broad appeal.
Softstar’s review absence indicates no recent or substantial user ratings, making it impossible to compare satisfaction levels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900/month, with no free tier or trial options noted. Pricing is straightforward but may be considered an investment for smaller hotels.
Softstar provides no pricing information, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs or whether it offers scalable or flexible pricing models.
In summary, Mews's transparent pricing and proven value make it a more predictable choice.
Not ideal if you need a rental-specific or tenant-focused property management system only.
Not ideal if you require a full-service hotel PMS with proven reviews, automation, and guest-facing features.
Mews stands out as a highly-rated, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews from a broad range of hotel segments. Its 99.5+ HT score, large review base, and recent user feedback confirm its reliability and scalability.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a proven platform with extensive integrations, automation, and user satisfaction, especially if you operate multiple properties or want a modern digital experience.
Softstar may suit niche rental or property management needs, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and proven track record makes it a less confident choice for hotels prioritizing guest service, operational automation, and growth.
For hotels seeking a dependable, high-rated solution, Mews is the clear winner—an investment that supports your hotel’s current needs and future growth.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Softstar 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Softstar 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Softstar:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Softstar 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问