The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Travelclick 表现出色 .
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Call center functionality and Geotargeted pricing module.
基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 28 |
在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,Travelclick 用户最看重其 ,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 无缝集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Travelclick |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
无缝集成
▾
|
|
|
+
评价购物
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
方便使用的
▾
|
|
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
集成问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #8 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #9 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 17 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #8 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #4 4 条评价 |
Choosing between Travelclick CRS and Vertical Booking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational maturity, and geographic presence. Travelclick CRS, once a dominant player in hotel reservations, now suffers from a near-zero rating, indicating it’s largely out of the market and unsupported. Conversely, Vertical Booking boasts a strong reputation, with a 4.61-star rating from 27 recent reviews, signaling active development, customer satisfaction, and ongoing support.
Both products aim to streamline reservations and distribution, but their current market engagement and feature sets diverge significantly. Travelclick’s near-total absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating make it a risky choice, especially for hotels seeking reliable, modern systems. Will your hotel risk choosing an unsupported product, or will Vertical Booking’s proven track record serve your needs better?
Travelclick CRS was once a staple in the hotel reservation landscape but now is effectively obsolete, with no recent reviews or active support evident. Its zero-star rating and no updates in the last six months suggest it no longer maintains a modern, functional platform.
Vertical Booking, however, is actively used and reviewed, with a high overall rating of 4.61/5 based on 27 recent reviews. Hotels appreciate its features, ease of use, and dedicated support, making it a dependable choice for hotels looking to improve booking efficiencies and revenue management.
Your decision should reflect whether you need a current, supported platform—Vertical Booking—or are willing to risk operational issues with Travelclick’s outdated system.
Travelclick’s user experience ratings are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s reasonable to assume that usability is outdated or unsupported. Hotels that used Travelclick describe it as no longer fitting modern expectations.
Vertical Booking, with a 4.41/5 ease of use rating based on 27 recent reviews, is regarded as user-friendly by many users. Users praise its intuitive interface, straightforward management, and quick onboarding, which help staff adopt the system faster.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick offers no unique features listed today, reflecting its lack of active development or recent updates. In contrast, Vertical Booking provides eight distinct features including call center functionality, geotargeted pricing, support for weekly and monthly rates, dynamic pricing, availability management, cancellation policies, booking rules, and TMC management.
Vertical Booking’s features directly support revenue growth, rate management, and operational control, surpassing what Travelclick can currently deliver. For hotel teams seeking advanced, up-to-date booking and rate management tools, Vertical Booking clearly leads.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick offers no recent support ratings or testimonials, indicating it likely lacks active support resources. Hotels that previously used Travelclick report no recent engagement, raising concerns about ongoing support and issue resolution.
Vertical Booking, with a 4.5/5 customer support rating from recent reviews, maintains a reputation for quick, helpful responses. Hotels describe support as responsive and attentive, critical for smooth operations and resolving technical issues swiftly.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick has only one verified integration, with no active partner updates, suggesting limited current compatibility. Its sole integration, Yanolja Cloud Solution, is niche and does not reflect broad connectivity.
Vertical Booking, by contrast, boasts 69 verified partners, including industry-standard PMS and booking channels like Priority Software, WebRezPro, and RateBoard GmbH. Its extensive integration network simplifies management across multiple systems and channels, saving time and reducing errors.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick’s ratings are nonexistent, and no recent reviews or hotel segment data are available, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its complete lack of recent activity indicates it’s not a preferred or supported choice now.
Vertical Booking, with 27 recent reviews, earns a 4.61/5 overall score. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and resorts, praise its functionality, support, and ease of use. Recent reviews indicate strong satisfaction levels.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick does not publicly list pricing, reflecting its outdated status and likely discontinued support. The absence of pricing information suggests it’s no longer a viable option.
Vertical Booking also does not share explicit pricing, but its value is reflected in its features and recent reviews praising its ROI and affordability. Its cost model appears competitive, especially given its active support and broad feature set.
Not ideal if:
Travelclick is not recommended for most hotels today.
Not ideal if:
Vertical Booking is suitable for hotels that want flexibility and ongoing support.
The core difference is that Vertical Booking is an actively supported, feature-rich system with a strong reputation, while Travelclick has become obsolete with no recent activity or reviews.
If your hotel values modern features, reliable support, and ongoing development, Vertical Booking is the clear choice. Travelclick should be avoided unless you are operating in a region or scenario where it still functions and your hotel’s operational needs are minimal.
For hotels aiming to maximize revenue, streamline operations, and future-proof their reservation platform, Vertical Booking offers measurable advantages. Travelclick is no longer a viable option for most modern hotels.
This comparison reflects current data—Vertical Booking’s active reviews, features, and support make it the safer, smarter investment for your hotel today.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Travelclick |
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Travelclick CRS 和 Vertical Booking (CRS) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| 动态定价 | ||
| 取消政策 | ||
| 可用性管理 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 地理定位定价模块 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然许多用户称赞 Vertical Booking 的客户服务的响应能力和解决问题的有效性,但一些评论指出,其速度和一致性方面需要改进,特别是针对美国市场。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能因其易用性和处理多个分销渠道的效率而获得了积极的反馈。用户指出,它简化了流程,并有助于在所有连接渠道上保持最新的价格和可用性。
许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平... 许多用户都赞赏 Vertical Booking 与其他系统的无缝集成,从而可以顺利同步价格、库存和预订。这种集成提高了效率并节省了时间,尤其是对于从单个界面管理多个平台而言。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Vertical Booking 经常被描述为用户友好且直观,让酒店员工无需经过大量培训即可轻松管理预订和房价。尽管如此,一些用户仍提到某些功能可以更直观和更简化。
该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大... 该预订引擎的功能普遍受到好评,但一些评论认为其界面可以更加可定制和现代化。用户特别提到需要在移动设备上提供更好的用户体验,并在设置折扣和促销时提供更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Travelclick CRS 和 Vertical Booking (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Travelclick CRS 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (CRS) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Travelclick CRS:否。Vertical Booking (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Travelclick 的 HT Score 为 0,Vertical Booking 的为 29。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案