The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 家政软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #13 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 1 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #7 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 1 条评价 | #7 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 12 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 41 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 42 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #13 1 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #10 0 条评价 |
Choosing between 1CHECK by 1CHECK and Quore (Cleanings Plus) boils down to your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both products address housekeeping management, but they diverge significantly in scope, feature depth, and user feedback. While 1CHECK offers a straightforward, connectivity-focused platform, Quore provides a comprehensive suite with extensive functionalities. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize simplicity or a broad operational toolkit.
Given the review data, Quore’s more extensive feature set and larger, more recent review base position it as the stronger choice. Will your hotel benefit from a more feature-rich solution and active user community? Let’s explore how these two options compare head-to-head.
Both 1CHECK and Quore target hotel operations, specifically housekeeping and maintenance, but they do so with different emphases. 1CHECK is designed as a simple, operational visibility tool that connects hotel staff directly with real-time room status updates. Quore, on the other hand, is a broad platform encompassing task management, communication, analytics, and even guest messaging.
While 1CHECK boasts a spotless 5/5 rating with only one review, its limited feature set and lack of recent activity suggest it may be less adaptable for hotels seeking more than basic updates. Quore, with its 4.59/5 rating from 46 reviews and active development, provides a richer experience for hotels managing larger teams or multiple properties.
Are you looking for a straightforward, easy-to-implement solution, or do you need a multi-functional platform that supports various departments and insights? The answer will guide your choice.
If your hotel requires a simple, reliable way to improve communication between housekeeping and reception without extensive additional functions, 1CHECK may suffice. Its core value lies in providing real-time status updates and simple operational oversight—ideal for small hotels or those with minimal tech needs.
For larger hotels or properties with complex workflows, automation, detailed reporting, and multi-department coordination, Quore is the better fit. Its 34 unique features—like work orders, asset logs, preventative maintenance, and analytics—are designed to streamline operations across the entire hotel ecosystem.
In short, opt for 1CHECK if you prioritize ease of use and basic communication. Choose Quore if your team requires a comprehensive, scalable operations platform.
1CHECK scored a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, supported by its simple interface and quick onboarding. Its minimalistic design makes it easy for staff to learn and adopt, with a straightforward process for updating room status from a tablet.
Quore also boasts a high usability score of 4.6/5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive mobile app and effective onboarding process. However, some users note that the extensive feature set can introduce complexity, requiring more initial training to maximize its potential.
Edge: 1CHECK.
1CHECK offers only 2 shared features, with no unique features of its own, reflecting its focused scope. Quore, in contrast, provides 34 unique features, including work orders, real-time task tracking, preventative maintenance, asset logs, notifications, and more.
Features like automated work orders, deep cleaning scheduling, and analytics dashboards set Quore apart, offering tools to manage multiple aspects of hotel operations beyond housekeeping alone. If your hotel needs robust task management and operational insights, Quore’s feature depth is unmatched.
Edge: Quore.
Both products enjoy high ratings for support—1CHECK with a perfect 5/5 and Quore close behind at 4.58/5. However, 1CHECK’s reviews are limited to a single recent review, making its support reputation less proven in recent times.
Quore’s support is consistently praised across 46 reviews, with feedback emphasizing its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Many users appreciate the proactive communication and thorough training resources.
Edge: Quore.
1CHECK connects with 11 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Maestro PMS, giving hotels flexibility. Quore has 8 verified integrations, including Zingle, Revinate, and Canary Technologies, with notable gaps in PMS connectivity.
While 1CHECK’s broader integration options may appeal to hotels with diverse systems, Quore’s integrations cover key guest experience tools and guest messaging platforms, benefiting hotels emphasizing guest interactions.
Edge: 1CHECK.
With only one review, 1CHECK’s rating is 0/5, which does not offer a valid comparison. Quore’s 46 reviews yield a strong 4.59/5, with positive comments on its functionality, responsiveness, and ease of use.
Quore’s larger, recent review base indicates higher confidence in its performance and customer satisfaction. Its ratings reflect a broad acceptance across different hotel types and sizes.
Edge: Quore.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models, but neither offers a free tier or trial period. 1CHECK’s pricing is unavailable, suggesting it may be a more limited, possibly subscription-based service.
Quore also lacks transparent pricing details, but its extensive feature set indicates a higher potential investment. Typically, such platforms are priced per property or user, with custom quotes depending on scope.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
1CHECK offers a straightforward, connectivity-oriented solution with a clean interface, ideal for small properties or those seeking quick communication improvements. Its recent lack of reviews and minimal features suggest it’s best suited for hotels with simple operational needs.
Quore stands out with its extensive features, active user feedback, and multi-department support. It’s the go-to choice for hotels looking to streamline operations, improve communication, and leverage data insights across their teams.
If your hotel values a broad, adaptable platform with proven customer satisfaction, Quore is the clear winner. For hotels prioritizing simplicity and fundamental communication, 1CHECK can serve as a quick-start solution.
In conclusion, based on recent reviews and feature breadth, Quore is the superior option for most hotels ready to invest in operational efficiency. But if your needs are modest, 1CHECK’s ease of use and straightforward approach may suffice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不... 用户强调 Quore 有效的任务管理功能,例如记录深度清洁和 PM 房间、设置自动工作订单以及组织待办事项列表。这些功能有助于确保员工按时完成检查目标,并确保不会忘记任务。
许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度... 许多酒店经营者都对 Quore 简化部门间沟通的能力表示赞赏,它使客户服务更加高效,减少了对对讲机等实体工具的需求。这种效率可以缩短响应时间,提高客人满意度,确保客房部、维护部和前台等部门能够无缝协调。
一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意... 一些评论指出了 Quore 的客户消息平台的优势,该平台允许酒店经营者通过短信与客人互动。此功能不仅符合现代通信标准,而且还通过更快的响应时间提高了客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人认为 Quore 易于使用,但一些评论指出某些功能令人困惑或多余。改进界面可以提升整体用户体验,尤其是对于桌面用户而言。
酒店经营者经常提到他们希望增加和改进的功能,例如更频繁的更新、集成库存管理和增强的推送通知。这些建议表明,参与的用户群希望从软件中获得更多价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。1CHECK 和 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 共享许多核心 Housekeeping Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。1CHECK 提供 11 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore (Cleanings Plus) 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。1CHECK 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
1CHECK:否。Quore (Cleanings Plus):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Housekeeping Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。1CHECK 的 HT Score 为 0,Quore 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问