The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 572 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 171 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #11 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 484 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 213 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #4 108 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 92 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 405 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 183 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 231 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #6 14 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management platform is vital for your hotel’s distribution and operational efficiency. Both 1Day by 1Day and Cloudbeds Channel Manager aim to streamline these processes, but their offerings and maturity levels differ significantly. How do they compare in real-world use, support, features, and overall value?
While 1Day claims to offer a simple solution, it lacks reviews, features, and regional presence, making Cloudbeds the more established choice. Are you ready to see which platform aligns best with your property’s needs?
Both products solve the core challenge of managing multiple distribution channels and avoiding overbookings, but only Cloudbeds offers a full suite of integrated features. 1Day is essentially a bare-bones channel manager with no reviews or recent user feedback, whereas Cloudbeds boasts over 1,000 reviews (1062 to be exact) and a near-perfect score of 99.81 out of 100.
Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set includes PMS connectivity, analytics, inventory management, multi-lingual support, and multi-currency support, all of which contribute to a more complete management system. Do you want a basic tool, or a platform that can grow with your hotel’s operations?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform that combines channel management with PMS, reporting, and automation, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Smaller properties that only need basic OTA synchronization and are comfortable with manual processes may consider 1Day, but the lack of reviews and regional presence diminishes its credibility.
Given Cloudbeds’ proven track record, strong customer feedback, and wide regional reach, it’s the better choice for hotels aiming for growth, multi-property management, or automation. Do you prioritize a proven, feature-rich platform over a minimal solution?
Cloudbeds’ ease of use is reflected in a 4.6/5 rating from over 1,000 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Conversely, 1Day has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge how easily your team could adopt it.
Cloudbeds’ user-friendly dashboard and extensive onboarding support make it simple for staff at all levels to get up to speed. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, and yield rules. In contrast, 1Day provides no additional features and remains a basic channel management tool.
The feature depth in Cloudbeds allows for automation, detailed reporting, multi-currency support, and unified control, all of which are absent in 1Day. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ customer support boasts a 4.41/5 rating from over 1,000 reviews, with many users highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness. Review quotes include, “I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds,” underscoring its support strengths.
Since 1Day has no reviews, there is no data to suggest it offers comparable support. Based on available evidence, Cloudbeds’ support is superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ platform integrates with 190 verified partners, covering a wide range of PMS, booking engines, and other hospitality solutions. 1Day, on the other hand, has zero verified integrations, severely limiting its flexibility and scalability.
This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack and adapt to evolving needs, making Cloudbeds a more versatile choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating of 4.64/5 is based on 1,062 reviews, including recent feedback from 74 reviews in the last six months. Properties across segments like independent hotels, boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts rate Cloudbeds highly for usability, support, and features.
In contrast, 1Day has no reviews, so hotelier satisfaction cannot be assessed. Given the recent and numerous reviews for Cloudbeds, it clearly holds higher trust and satisfaction levels. Edge: Cloudbeds.
1Day’s pricing model is not publicly available and appears to lack a trial or transparent fees. Cloudbeds charges a base price of $200/month, with no implementation fees or trial offers, providing clarity on costs.
While Cloudbeds’ price is on the higher end compared to basic channel managers, its comprehensive features justify the investment for most hotels seeking growth and automation. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Given the lack of reviews or features, 1Day is best suited for very small or entry-level properties with straightforward needs.
Not ideal if your property prefers minimal tech or has very limited budgets, as Cloudbeds’ pricing and feature set are more suited for growth-oriented operations.
Cloudbeds is an established, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide, with a proven track record backed by extensive reviews and recent feedback. Its broad integration network, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive features make it the clear choice for hotels seeking efficiency and scalability.
In contrast, 1Day is a minimal, unreviewed solution that might appeal only to very small or budget-constrained properties with simple OTA needs. For most hotels aiming to grow or streamline operations, Cloudbeds offers the reliability and flexibility that matter most.
When to choose Cloudbeds: If you need a scalable, integrated platform with strong support, advanced features, and proven hotelier satisfaction, Cloudbeds is your best option.
When to consider 1Day: If your hotel’s needs are limited to basic OTA management without plans to expand or automate further, you might explore 1Day, but be aware of its lack of reviews and features.
In summary: For hotels serious about growth, automation, and reliable support, Cloudbeds dominates as the more mature and trusted choice.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航... Cloudbeds直观的界面受到许多用户的好评,他们认为该界面对各级员工都非常友好。这一优势缩短了培训时间,提高了操作的一致性,但部分用户仍然认为高级功能导航方面还有改进空间。
该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一... 该平台跨渠道的实时同步功能被誉为一项关键特性。这为用户提供了最新的库存信息,显著减少了超额预订的情况。评论者强调了其在保持OTA和直接预订等平台间信息一致性方面的重要性。
许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订... 许多用户称赞 Cloudbeds 将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎无缝集成,减少了对多个系统的需求,从而简化了操作。这种集成有助于员工集中高效地管理预订、房价和宾客互动,提高工作效率并减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更... 虽然 Cloudbeds 支持基本功能,但其在网站设计、消息传递和报告等方面的自定义选项一直备受诟病。用户希望在定制这些功能方面拥有更大的灵活性和控制权,以便更好地满足特定的业务需求并改善宾客体验。
尽管该平台总体运行良好,但部分用户反映在高峰时段偶尔会出现速度瓶颈和延迟,这会影响工作效率。因此,我们希望在高峰时段加快加载速度并提高系统响应速度。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。1day 和 Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。1day 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
1day:否。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。1Day 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问