The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | 24online |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | 24online |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #10 44 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 47 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #8 48 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | 24online |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 103 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #18 1 条评价 |
Choosing between 24Online by 24online and Medallia Zingle by Zingle hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest communication and operational support. Both promise to improve guest engagement, but their capabilities and maturity vary significantly. 24Online, with zero recent reviews and a score of 0/5, offers very limited data and is less proven in the market. Zingle, on the other hand, with 107 reviews and a solid 4.68/5 rating, demonstrates a more established track record. Which solution will better serve your hotel’s guest experience goals?
24Online aims to provide basic guest messaging, but its lack of recent reviews and an overall rating of 0/5 cast doubt on its current effectiveness. Zingle excels with recent feedback, boasting a high rating and a 95% likelihood to recommend, showing strong confidence from users. Zingle’s focus on two-way messaging channels like SMS, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp allows for more dynamic and immediate guest interactions.
While 24Online appears to be a simple platform with no featured capabilities or notable integrations, Zingle offers 21 features, including automated replies, chatbots, messaging surveys, and integrations with major PMS systems. The core question: Is a minimal, unverified solution sufficient, or do you prefer a well-rated platform with active development and real-world use?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, no-frills messaging tool to handle basic guest inquiries, 24Online might seem attractive. However, with no recent reviews, unverified integrations, and a blank feature set, its utility remains uncertain. Conversely, Zingle’s extensive feature set, high user satisfaction, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing guest engagement, operational automation, and multi-channel messaging.
Hotels seeking a trusted, fully-featured guest messaging platform should favor Zingle. Smaller hotels or those with minimal communication needs may consider 24Online, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky option for most.
Zingle earns a stellar 4.73/5 rating for ease of use, with most reviewers praising its intuitive interface and simple staff onboarding process. Users describe Zingle as "very user friendly" and note how quickly staff adapt, with some mentioning that new team members become proficient within days.
24Online, with a 0/5 usability score and no recent reviews, offers no current insights into user experience or onboarding. Its minimal presence suggests it might lack the polish or support found in Zingle. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle offers 21 features, including SMS texting, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, automation, analytics, guest history, and chatbot booking. These capabilities empower your team to manage guest interactions at scale, automate routine tasks, and analyze guest preferences.
24Online provides no documented features, leaving its functional scope and flexibility in question. Its lack of a feature set or integrations makes it less appealing for hotels seeking robust guest engagement tools.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s support ratings are high at 4.58/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful service and effective onboarding. Users say, “Their customer service is legendary,” and highlight how support contributes to smooth implementation and ongoing success.
24Online offers no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Given Zingle’s proven support reputation, it clearly leads in this area. Edge: Zingle.
Zingle integrates with 16 verified partners, including major systems like Opera, HotSOS, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality, offering extensive connectivity options. These integrations streamline workflows and data sharing across your property’s management systems.
24Online, with only one verified partner (Yanolja Cloud), provides limited integration capabilities. The lack of broader connectivity could hinder your ability to automate and optimize guest communications.
Edge: Zingle.
Zingle’s review score of 4.68/5, based on 107 recent reviews, indicates strong and consistent satisfaction among hoteliers. It’s especially favored by independent, branded, and resort hotels, with ratings averaging above 4.7/5.
24Online offers no recent reviews or ratings, rendering its standing unclear. Without recent feedback, Zingle’s proven reputation makes it the clear choice for most properties.
Edge: Zingle.
Pricing for both platforms is not publicly disclosed, but neither offers free plans or trial periods. Expect to negotiate custom pricing based on your hotel’s size and needs, with Zingle’s broad feature set justifying a potentially higher investment.
Since detailed pricing is unavailable, focus on value and support quality when assessing your options.
Not ideal if you need automation, multi-channel messaging, or integration with PMS systems.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a very basic or unproven platform without recent reviews or extensive features.
Zingle is a mature, feature-rich guest messaging platform with a proven track record and highly positive reviews. Its integrations, automation, and user satisfaction make it suitable for most hotels looking to elevate guest communication.
24Online remains a questionable option due to the absence of recent validation, reviews, or notable features. Unless your hotel has very limited needs and is willing to accept uncertainty, Zingle clearly offers more value.
If your priority is reliability, scalability, and proven performance, Zingle is the recommended choice. For minimal, basic messaging needs, consider 24Online, but proceed cautiously given its lack of recent market presence.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消... 用户发现 Zingle 擅长与客人轻松快速地沟通,可以在问题升级之前解决问题。这种适应性提高了客人满意度并减轻了员工的工作量。同时处理多个客人查询和发送大量消息的能力被视为一项重要优势。
Zingle 的用户友好界面广受好评,让酒店员工能够轻松了解并高效处理客人消息。这种易用性既适用于网络平台,也适用于移动应用程序。
自动消息传递功能因处理日常通信和缩短响应时间而受到好评。然而,有人批评自动回复并不总是准确反映当前状态,这可能会让客人感到困惑。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍对 Zingle 的消息和平台本身的自定义选项表示赞赏。然而,一些新用户发现自定义某些功能以满足他们的特定需求具有挑战性,这表明灵活性还有待提高。
虽然大多数用户对 Zingle 感到满意,但也有部分用户指出其存在系统崩溃、消息延迟、与 PMS 同步问题等技术问题,影响了整体效率和用户体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。24Online 和 Medallia Zingle 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。24Online 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Medallia Zingle 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Medallia Zingle 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
24Online:否。Medallia Zingle:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。24online 的 HT Score 为 0,Zingle 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问