The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 169 条经验证的评价后,Ziosk 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 用户界面和报表, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和报表
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
操作改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 44 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 94 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 74 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 31 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 130 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel can feel overwhelming, especially with options like Ziosk Tablets by Ziosk and Mews POS by Mews. Both products aim to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences but approach these goals quite differently. Ziosk is primarily geared toward casual dining environments with embedded entertainment and ordering features, while Mews offers a comprehensive, hotel-specific POS integrated into its broader property management ecosystem.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a tablet-based, guest-facing entertainment solution or a fully integrated hotel POS that connects effortlessly with your property management system (PMS). Do your team’s needs lean more toward guest engagement at the table or seamless operational automation across your property?
Ziosk aims to revolutionize casual dining with its touchscreen tablets that give guests control over their food and beverage orders, play games, and pay at the table. It’s designed specifically for the restaurant side of hospitality, offering interactive digital menus and media experiences on each table, but it doesn’t integrate with PMS or hotel operations.
In contrast, Mews POS is built with hotel operations in mind. It integrates directly with Mews PMS and other third-party systems, automating billing, inventory, and reporting processes. Mews also supports online orders, mobile ordering, and transaction management, all within a purpose-built hotel ecosystem.
While Ziosk fosters guest engagement through entertainment and ordering at the table, Mews streamlines operational workflows, reduces manual errors, and centralizes financial management. The question is whether your property needs to elevate guest interaction at the restaurant level or optimize overall hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive POS solution that integrates tightly with your PMS, automates billing, and offers advanced reporting features, Mews POS is the clear choice. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those with multiple outlets or a focus on operational efficiency, as it covers dining, bar, and retail transactions while providing real-time data.
If your primary goal is to enhance guest experience at a casual dining restaurant, with entertainment and self-service ordering on tables, Ziosk might seem appealing. However, given its lack of PMS integration, it’s less suitable for full-scale hotel operations. Mews is preferable if you seek a unified system that reduces errors, improves service speed, and adapts to complex hotel environments.
In summary, choose Mews POS for operational excellence and integration, and consider Ziosk only if guest engagement at the table is your main focus without the need for hotel-wide POS integration.
Ziosk’s interface is simple and designed for casual dining, with a single focus on entertainment and food ordering at the table. However, it doesn’t connect to other hotel systems, meaning your staff may need to juggle multiple platforms for different operational needs.
Mews POS scores 4.74 out of 5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with a highly intuitive interface praised for quick onboarding and staff adoption. Its cloud-based system offers consistent access across devices, simplifying operations and training for staff at all levels.
Edge: Mews.
Ziosk’s core features are limited to table ordering, entertainment, and payment processing, with no integrations or advanced reporting, making it a focused but narrow solution.
Mews offers a suite of 29 features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, inventory management, ingredient control, mobile ordering, connected kitchen display, rewards programs, and extensive reporting tools. These features support comprehensive hotel restaurant management, automation, and data analysis.
Edge: Mews.
Ziosk’s support is not well-documented in recent reviews, and its overall rating indicates a lack of recent feedback or satisfaction data, suggesting limited or unverified support options.
Mews receives a 4.43 out of 5 support rating, with many recent reviews praising its reliable, solution-oriented customer service. Hotels like Hotel Lancaster and Bush Hotel highlight the team’s responsiveness and support during onboarding and operation.
Edge: Mews.
Ziosk has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and tools.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its extensive integration ecosystem allows for streamlined operations, from channel management to accounting and guest engagement.
Edge: Mews.
Ziosk has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction.
Mews holds a 9.32 out of 10 NPS score from 156 recent reviews, with 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes and segments, particularly those focused on automation and guest data, rate Mews highly for operational efficiency and support.
Edge: Mews.
Ziosk does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is typically sold as a hardware solution with potential licensing or maintenance costs, often embedded within restaurant or hospitality packages.
Mews charges a base price of $200 per month, with no hidden fees. Its pricing model is straightforward, allowing hotels to budget for a purpose-built POS integrated with a broader property management platform.
Not ideal if your hotel requires full POS integration, inventory management, or operational automation.
Not ideal if your focus is solely on casual dining entertainment without the need for PMS integration.
The core difference lies in scope: Ziosk is a table-focused entertainment and ordering device, whereas Mews is a comprehensive hotel POS that connects with your entire property management system.
Choose Ziosk if your priority is guest engagement at the table with no need for integration, but expect limited operational capabilities. Opt for Mews if you want a flexible, integrated system that reduces manual work, offers detailed analytics, and supports your hotel’s growth.
For hotels aiming to streamline operations and serve guests efficiently across multiple channels, Mews’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive features make it the safer, more scalable choice. Ziosk may serve niche needs, but for broad hotel success, Mews is the clear winner.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方... Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方面。
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客... 该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客互动。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ziosk Tablets 和 Mews POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ziosk Tablets 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews POS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ziosk Tablets:否。Mews POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ziosk 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问