The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ACIGRUP 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 34 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,ACIGRUP 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's success. Both ACI Hotel by ACIGRUP and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to streamline operations, but they approach this goal differently. ACI Hotel offers a comprehensive AI-powered platform with a limited review footprint, while Shiji Daylight PMS is a widely adopted, cloud-native system with a robust feature set and more recent, positive user feedback. Which one aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both products serve the fundamental purpose of managing hotel operations, reservations, and guest data. ACI Hotel emphasizes AI-driven review analysis and recommendations, which can help optimize guest satisfaction strategies, but it lacks recent user reviews or a broad user base. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS is a mature, widely used solution with 32 reviews in the past six months, all showing high satisfaction and a 90% likelihood to recommend. Are you prioritizing innovative AI tools or proven operational scalability?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s ideal for hotels seeking detailed reporting, automation, and a system proven in diverse markets, especially given its 64 verified partners and global presence. If your team is looking for a platform that combines AI review insights to improve guest satisfaction and operational recommendations, ACI Hotel could be appealing—though its limited recent data makes it less reliable for current decision-making. Do you need a proven, scalable solution or an AI-enhanced platform for guest feedback?
Shiji Daylight PMS scores a 4.63/5 in ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward training materials, and efficient onboarding process. Many reviewers mention how quickly new employees can get up to speed, citing positive experiences with its help resources. ACI Hotel, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given the recent positive feedback, edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers an impressive 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, digital registration, real-time reporting, and automation tools like rules-based room assignments. ACI Hotel's feature set is not detailed, and it lacks the extensive modules seen in Shiji's system. The sheer volume and sophistication of features in Shiji give it a clear edge for comprehensive hotel management needs.
Shiji Group’s support rating is 4.53/5, with users describing their support team as professional, helpful, and responsive—especially during implementation. A recent lack of reviews for ACIGRUP means support quality remains unverified, but the absence of recent feedback suggests a less reliable support experience. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS connects with 64 verified partners, including booking engines, revenue management systems, and POS integrations, giving your hotel flexibility and operational coherence. ACIGRUP has no verified integrations listed, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools crucial for multi-channel management. For connectivity and scalability, edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
With 32 recent reviews and a 90% recommendation rate, hoteliers are highly satisfied with Shiji Daylight PMS, particularly valuing its user-friendliness and comprehensive features. Conversely, ACI Hotel has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Given recent feedback, edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
ACI Hotel's pricing information is unavailable, which makes budgeting difficult. Shiji Daylight PMS charges approximately $1,200 per month, with no free tier or trial, but its pricing reflects its extensive features and support. Is predictable pricing and transparency a priority for your hotel? If so, Shiji's clear pricing offers better planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Shiji Daylight PMS’s core advantage is its proven, extensive feature set, large user base, and recent positive reviews, making it the more reliable choice. ACI Hotel, while potentially innovative with AI review analysis, lacks recent data and proven scalability, which limits its suitability for most hotels today.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable, and well-supported PMS with proven market presence, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. The system’s extensive integrations, detailed reporting, and positive recent user feedback make it the clear leader.
Choose ACI Hotel only if your primary goal is AI-driven review insights and your hotel operates on a smaller scale or in a niche market where AI recommendations can significantly impact guest satisfaction. Its lack of recent reviews and minimal user data make it a riskier choice for most properties.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking stability, scalability, and proven performance, Shiji Daylight PMS is the recommended option. If your hotel values innovative review analytics above all and is comfortable with limited recent feedback, ACI Hotel might be worth exploring further—though it remains less tested in the current market landscape.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| ACIGRUP |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ACI Hotel 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ACI Hotel 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ACI Hotel 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ACI Hotel:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ACIGRUP 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问