The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Acigrup PMS by Acigroup and Counter by Counter hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and target market. Both platforms aim to streamline property management but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. Given the stark differences in their review volumes and recency, this comparison centers on the data that best reflects current performance and user satisfaction.
Acigroup offers a broad, all-in-one management system primarily tailored for hotels with complex needs, but it suffers from zero reviews and no recent data—raising questions about its real-world usability. Conversely, Counter boasts over 50 reviews, a high rating of 4.73/5, and recent feedback from users, making it a more reliable choice today. Which product aligns better with your property’s scale and operational demands?
Both Acigroup PMS and Counter address core property management tasks such as reservations, check-ins, and billing, but they differ in scope and user feedback. Acigroup’s zero reviews and no recent activity suggest limited deployment or market presence, leaving its practical effectiveness unverified. Counter, with 54 reviews and a high NPS score of 9.02/10, demonstrates consistent satisfaction among hoteliers, especially in the hostel segment.
While Acigroup appears to target a broad hotel market, Counter’s focus on hostels and small properties makes it more suitable for budget accommodations prioritizing ease of use and automation. Are you looking for a tested, user-driven PMS that’s actively improving? Or are you considering an unproven platform with minimal recent data?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management platform capable of handling complex operations, consider Acigroup. However, given its lack of reviews and recent activity, it’s challenging to assess its performance or support quality. Counter should be your pick if you operate a hostel or budget property, or if you prioritize ease of use, automation, and proven reliability, supported by extensive positive feedback.
Counter’s strengths lie in its intuitive interface, high customer support ratings, and a rich feature set including channel management, integrated payments, and mobile access—all of which are crucial for small to medium hostels aiming for efficiency. If your focus is on streamlined operations and user satisfaction, Counter is the clear choice.
User ratings highlight Counter’s superior usability, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use score based on recent reviews, and a 4.96/5 support rating. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and responsive support, with one reviewer stating, “The interface loads seamlessly on mobile, and support is very helpful.” Acigroup, with a 0/5 rating and no reviews, offers no data to verify its ease of adoption or usability.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design and straightforward calendar view make daily management simple, even for staff with limited technical skills. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, integrated payments, booking engine, group functionality, and a mobile app—features that Acigroup lacks entirely. Acigroup’s feature set remains unlisted or limited, making it difficult to compare directly, but the absence of feature data indicates it does not compete on this front.
Counter’s comprehensive suite supports core hostel needs and more advanced revenue and guest management, making it suitable for properties seeking automation and multi-platform integration. Edge: Counter.
Support ratings favor Counter, with a 4.96/5 score and explicit praise in reviews for its responsiveness and professionalism—users mention team members like Evelyn and Max as highly helpful. Acigroup, with no recent review data or ratings, offers no verifiable support quality, leaving its customer service reputation unknown.
Counter’s support team is often noted to reply promptly, even during urgent issues, which is critical when managing reservations or resolving technical glitches. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, offering extensive options for payments and channel management. Acigroup does not list any verified integrations, indicating a significant gap.
This broader integration ecosystem allows Counter users to connect seamlessly with booking platforms, payment providers, and other operational tools, enabling smoother workflows. Edge: Counter.
While Acigroup has no recent reviews, Counter’s 54 reviews and high rating of 4.73/5 reflect strong satisfaction, especially among hostel operators—many praise its ease of use and automation. Hoteliers managing hostels rate Counter particularly highly, with many reviews citing improved efficiency and excellent support.
Given the recent reviews and high scores, Counter’s user ratings are more trustworthy. If you value proven customer satisfaction, Counter is the better-rated product today.
Acigroup does not publish pricing details, making it difficult to evaluate its value proposition. Counter also does not specify exact prices, but its free core offering and the absence of a trial suggest flexible or custom pricing models—likely tailored for small properties and hostels.
Expect to pay for additional features or integrations with Counter, but overall, its transparent model and active support suggest good value for money compared to the opaque pricing of Acigroup.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Acigroup offers a management system with little recent validation, leaving its actual performance uncertain. Counter, with a proven track record, high ratings, and a dedicated hostel focus, is the more reliable choice for small to medium properties.
If your hotel needs a flexible, well-supported platform with a rich feature set, Counter is the recommended option. Its active user base and recent positive reviews make it the safer, more immediate solution. Acigroup might appeal if you’re seeking a broad enterprise solution, but without verifiable recent data, it remains a risky choice. For now, Counter’s proven track record makes it the clear winner.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acigrup PMS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acigrup PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acigrup PMS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acigroup 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问