Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Counter 与 HotelTime PMS 的优缺点是什么？
在分析了 606 条经验证的评价后，Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能，而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
Counter 对比 HOTELTIME：按酒店细分市场排名
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型（10-24 间客房） ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型（25-74 间客房） ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型（75-199 间客房） ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 4 条评价 | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #1 21 条评价 |
The Decision
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Counter by Counter, a free PMS tailored for hostels, offers simplicity and ease of use, while HotelTime PMS provides a feature-rich, scalable solution suitable for a range of hotel types. Both platforms aim to streamline your daily tasks, but their core strengths and target users diverge significantly.
Counter excels in user-friendliness and affordability, making it ideal for hostels and small properties. HotelTime, however, caters to larger, more complex operations with extensive features and integrations. Which one best fits your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions?
Is Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS Better for Hotels?
Counter by Counter is a free, straightforward PMS designed specifically for hostels. Its primary focus is on simplicity, with an intuitive interface that minimizes staff training time. Its mobile-friendly design allows for management on the go, making it a favorite for small, dynamic properties.
HotelTime PMS offers a comprehensive suite of features, including automation, revenue management, and integrations with numerous third-party systems. Its cloud-based system supports properties of all sizes but is especially suited for hotels with more complex operations or multiple revenue streams.
While Counter emphasizes ease of use and quick deployment, HotelTime prioritizes versatility and depth of functionality. Do you need a simple solution to get started quickly, or a robust platform to grow with?
Counter by Counter vs HotelTime PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property with limited staff and straightforward operations, Counter by Counter is the better choice. Its 54 reviews with an overall rating of 4.73/5 and recent feedback highlight its ease of use and fast support, particularly appreciated by hostel operators.
Conversely, if your property is a resort, boutique hotel, or chain requiring advanced features like revenue management, guest profiles, and extensive integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear winner. With over 430 reviews and a higher overall rating of 4.83/5, it’s trusted across a broader hotel spectrum, including larger and more complex establishments.
Your decision hinges on your property size and operational complexity. For small, simple properties, Counter delivers quick wins; for larger hotels, HotelTime’s extensive capabilities support growth and efficiency.
Is Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS Easier to Use?
Counter by Counter boasts a user rating of 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its straightforward interface and quick staff onboarding. Its mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage operations anywhere, with minimal training required.
HotelTime PMS scores slightly higher at 4.66/5.0, with users noting its intuitive layout and comprehensive training resources. Despite its broader feature set, users report that once familiar, staff can operate HotelTime efficiently, thanks to its clear navigation and support.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Which Has Better Features: Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS?
Counter offers core PMS functionalities like reservations, check-ins, and basic POS integration, totaling around 19 shared features with HotelTime. However, it lacks advanced modules such as revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and digital registration.
HotelTime boasts over 32 exclusive features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest profiles, gift vouchers, automated reminders, tablet check-in, rate management, and native email marketing. These tools enable a fully connected property operation and personalized guest experiences.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS?
Counter’s reviews frequently highlight its support team’s responsiveness, with mentions of quick replies from Evelyn and Max, and a support rating of 4.96/5. Users appreciate the ongoing improvements and helpfulness, especially for hostel operators managing on tight timelines.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with users valuing detailed onboarding, ongoing training, and responsive assistance. Some reviews suggest extending support hours for international clients, but overall, support is recognized as proactive and knowledgeable.
Edge: Counter by Counter.
Which Has More Integrations: Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS?
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, GOKI, and channel managers like WuBook and FLYR, primarily targeting smaller or niche integrations suited for hostels or boutique properties.
HotelTime offers a vastly larger ecosystem, with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers, booking engines like Profitroom, and revenue control tools. Its extensive integrations support larger properties that need a connected and scalable tech stack.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter by Counter or HotelTime PMS?
Counter’s reviews, though positive, are limited to 54, with many praising its simplicity and support for hostel operations. Recent reviews focus on bugs and bugs affecting features like bed availability and overbooking, which some hoteliers find problematic.
HotelTime, with 433 reviews, maintains a high rating of 4.83/5, especially among resorts, boutique hotels, and larger properties. Reviewers emphasize its comprehensive functionality, ease of management, and support for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
How Much Do Counter by Counter and HotelTime PMS Cost?
Counter is free, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious hostels and small properties. Its no-cost model facilitates quick deployment without upfront investment, but it may lack some advanced features of paid systems.
HotelTime’s price is $600/month, reflecting its broader feature set and extensive integrations. Its subscription model is suitable for hotels that need more automation, customization, and multi-property management, supporting a higher level of operational complexity.
What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter by Counter?
- Hotels that operate as hostels, B&Bs, or inns with basic reservation needs.
- Teams seeking a simple, mobile-friendly PMS that’s quick to implement.
- Small properties with limited staff and straightforward workflows.
- Hotels that prioritize cost-effectiveness and ease of onboarding.
- Hotels that do not require advanced revenue management or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced modules like guest CRM, online check-in, or revenue optimization tools.
What Type of Hotel Should Use HotelTime PMS?
- Resorts, boutique hotels, and large properties with multiple revenue centers.
- Teams that want extensive automation, guest personalization, and detailed reporting.
- Properties that require integrations with POS, spa, and third-party systems.
- Hotels aiming for a scalable system that supports expansion.
- Hotels that value real-time data access and sophisticated revenue management.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-focused, or prioritizes simplicity over features.
HotelTime PMS vs Counter by Counter: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter by Counter is a straightforward, no-cost PMS tailored for hostels and small properties. Its ease of use and quick support make it ideal for properties prioritizing simplicity and affordability, but it lacks the advanced features needed for larger, more complex operations.
HotelTime PMS provides a full-featured, scalable platform trusted by hundreds of properties worldwide. Its extensive modules and integrations support growth, automation, and detailed management, making it the right choice for mid-sized to large hotels.
If your hotel needs a simple, quick-to-start system, Counter offers a solid foundation. For properties aiming to grow, optimize revenue, and deliver personalized guest experiences, HotelTime is the clear leader.
实际成果：Counter 对比 HOTELTIME（按业务目标）
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Counter 对比 HOTELTIME：总结
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好，便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好，允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好，便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好，允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而，有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意，其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意，其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误，尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏，但指出报告可以改进，以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足，特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏，但指出报告可以改进，以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足，特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏，但一些评论指出，延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验，确保随时都能获得帮助，特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
关于 Counter 与 HotelTime PMS 的常见问题
Counter 能否替代 HotelTime PMS？
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能，但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter 或 HotelTime PMS 是否提供免费方案？
Counter：否。HotelTime PMS：否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 HotelTime PMS？
HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17，HOTELTIME 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何？ 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？ 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？ 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？ 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
酒店从业者还在阅读哪些 物业管理系统 对比？
探索更多基于经验证酒店从业者评价的一对一对比。
获取个性化的产品推荐
产品推荐顾问
