The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #46 5 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #56 2 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #60 1 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #55 1 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Acomos and Counter essentially hinges on what your hotel needs most: comprehensive management features or streamlined simplicity for hostels. Acomos offers a broad set of tools designed to cater to larger or more complex properties, whereas Counter emphasizes ease of use, automation, and affordability for hostels. Both systems aim to simplify operations, but they diverge significantly in scope, usability, and target market.
While Acomos has a larger global presence, more features, and more extensive integrations, Counter boasts a higher overall user rating, more recent reviews, and a faster-growing customer base. Which of these strengths aligns better with your hotel's current priorities?
Acomos and Counter both serve as property management systems but cater to different hotel types and operational sizes. Acomos attempts to address the needs of diverse property segments, including airport/conference hotels, boutique inns, and larger independent hotels, offering tools like revenue management, guest CRM, and integrated payment solutions. Counter, on the other hand, is tailored specifically for hostels, focusing on ease of use, automation, and mobile management, making it ideal for small, fast-paced properties.
The data shows Acomos has only 5 reviews, with no recent activity, and a low 3.1/5 overall rating, indicating limited current customer feedback or ongoing development. Conversely, Counter has 54 reviews, all recent, with a high 4.73/5 rating, demonstrating active user engagement and satisfaction. Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, Counter’s current user experience appears more reliable.
Hoteliers need to evaluate whether they require a full-featured PMS with advanced modules or a straightforward platform that minimizes training and maximizes automation. Are you looking for a system that scales with your property or one optimized for quick adoption and daily efficiency?
If your hotel manages a hostel, boutique inn, or small independent property, Counter is the better choice. Its streamlined interface, mobile accessibility, automated functions, and positive recent reviews make it ideal for properties prioritizing guest experience and operational simplicity. Many users highlight Counter’s ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, which is critical for fast-paced or resource-constrained teams.
If your hotel is larger, needs revenue management, guest CRM, or integrated EPoS, Acomos may be more suitable despite its limited recent feedback. Acomos's extensive feature set—covering more specialized needs—appeals to properties with complex operations or those looking to centralize management across multiple departments.
For properties focused on speed, ease, and guest experience, Counter is the safer pick. For hotels with more complex operational requirements and the resources to implement a broader system, Acomos could provide long-term value.
Counter scores significantly higher for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating, compared to Acomos’s 3.5/5. User reviews consistently praise Counter’s intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, and quick onboarding, with many mentioning how new staff can learn the system rapidly. Support responsiveness is also a key strength, with users citing fast and friendly assistance.
Acomos’s lower onboarding score of 2.63/5 reflects its more complex interface, which may require more time and training to adopt. Its older reviews mention a learning curve, and recent feedback indicates limited customer support activity.
Edge: Counter.
Acomos offers 16 shared features with Counter, but also includes 9 unique modules such as revenue management, guest CRM, EPoS, gift vouchers, and native email marketing—features not present in Counter. It also integrates with fewer platforms (two verified partners) but provides more specialized tools for large or multi-department hotels.
Counter provides 16 shared features and 3 exclusive features, notably a mobile app, multi-lingual support, and centralized user management. Its automation capabilities—contactless check-in, automatic payments—are prominent advantages, especially for hostels or small hotels.
Given the feature count, Acomos's additional modules may be overkill for smaller properties, while Counter’s automation and mobile features directly enhance operational efficiency in fast-paced hostel environments.
Edge: Acomos, for its broader, more in-depth feature set.
Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses from Evelyn and Max. Many users appreciate the responsiveness, especially in urgent situations, and the ongoing improvements driven by customer feedback.
Acomos’s support score of 3.3/5 indicates a more inconsistent experience. Recent reviews criticize limited responsiveness and slow issue resolution, which could hamper daily operations. The older reviews suggest the support was better previously but has declined recently.
Edge: Counter.
Counter surpasses Acomos with 7 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and WuBook, along with the shared partner SiteMinder. Its broader integration ecosystem facilitates connecting with industry-standard tools, simplifying operations.
Acomos only integrates with two verified partners, one of which is SiteMinder, limiting connectivity options. For a hotel seeking extensive platform integration, Counter’s network offers more flexibility.
Edge: Counter.
Recent reviews reveal Counter’s higher sentiment, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews, mainly from hostel properties. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Acomos’s reviews are limited, with an overall rating of 3.1/5 based on 5 reviews, only some of which are recent or positive. Its older reviews indicate satisfaction among long-term users but no recent activity to reflect current performance.
Therefore, Counter’s higher and more recent ratings demonstrate greater customer satisfaction today.
Edge: Counter.
Pricing details for Acomos are not publicly available, but it does not offer a freemium plan or transparent monthly rates, suggesting a custom or enterprise-level pricing model. Acomos’s implementation and ongoing support costs are likely covered within a higher-tier plan, suitable for larger hotels.
Counter is also free to start with, with no implementation or monthly fees disclosed. Its pricing model appears straightforward, making it accessible for small hostels and independent hotels without large budgets.
For strict budget considerations, Counter’s transparency and free entry point offer a clear advantage; for larger operations, Acomos’s custom pricing may reflect its broader feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs quick setup, or prioritizes affordability over specialized features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive revenue management, CRM, or multi-department capabilities.
Acomos is a broad, feature-rich property management system tailored for larger or more complex hotels. Its strength lies in its extensive modules and integrations, but its limited recent customer feedback and support concerns suggest it may not match current market expectations.
Counter excels in simplicity, automation, and rapid support, making it a compelling choice for hostels and small hotels that prioritize operational ease and guest experience. Its high recent ratings and active user community indicate a system that adapts quickly to user needs.
If your hotel values a comprehensive platform capable of scaling with your operations, Acomos remains a viable choice—though its limited recent activity warrants caution. For quick deployment, ease of use, and ongoing support, Counter is the more reliable option today.
In conclusion, if your priority is a flexible, user-friendly PMS with active support and recent positive feedback, Counter is the clear winner. If you operate a larger or more complex property and need an in-depth management system, Acomos could meet your long-term needs, provided you’re prepared for a potentially steeper learning curve.
Note: All observations are based on the latest reviews and available data. Hotel managers should consider their specific operational needs and budget before making a decision.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acomos 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acomos 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acomos:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acomos 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问