The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #7 0 条评价 | #3 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 0 条评价 | #4 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 21 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 0 条评价 | #2 31 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #2 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 28 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #3 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 61 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #6 0 条评价 | #3 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #2 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Adyen and ROH for your hotel's payments processing hinges on your specific needs. Both platforms aim to streamline payments, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and industry focus. Adyen offers a global, multi-channel payments infrastructure with extensive features, while ROH specializes in simplifying financial workflows tailored to hospitality. Your decision should consider how these differences align with your hotel’s size, location, and operational priorities. Are you seeking a broad, feature-rich platform or a user-friendly, hospitality-focused solution?
Adyen is a highly established payments processing system with a broad international presence, supporting complex, multi-channel transactions across online, mobile, and in-store environments. Its core strength lies in its robust integrations, extensive feature set—including contactless payments, multi-currency settlements, and local payment methods—and a vast network of verified partners.
ROH, on the other hand, is designed specifically for the hospitality industry, emphasizing automation and ease of use for hotel payments and invoicing. It has a significantly smaller partner ecosystem but excels in automating invoice generation, payment scheduling, and real-time reporting, which are crucial for cash flow management in hotels.
Both platforms aim to make payment processes smoother, but Adyen's global reach and comprehensive features suit large, multi-property chains or hotels needing diverse payment options. Conversely, ROH’s straightforward interface and industry-specific tools appeal more to hotels focused on operational efficiency and automated financial workflows.
Do you need a globally scalable, feature-rich platform or a hospitality-specific, user-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs a payment system capable of handling complex, multi-channel transactions across different countries, Adyen is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—such as contactless payments, 3-D Secure, WeChatPay, AliPay, Paypal, and multi-currency settlements—makes it suitable for large or international hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, automation, and real-time financial insights, ROH is the better fit. With a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating from 65 recent reviews, it’s perfect for hotels wanting streamlined invoice management, automated scheduling, and quick onboarding.
Hotels seeking broad global payment options and extensive integrations should choose Adyen. Those focused on operational simplicity, faster cash flow, and industry-specific workflows will benefit most from ROH.
ROH scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 in ease of use based on 65 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Many mention how simple it is for staff and clients to send or receive payments, with comments like, “It makes my job so much easier,” and “Very user friendly, no questions from customers.”
Adyen, by contrast, scores 0/5 in ease of use, indicating significant challenges in onboarding and daily operation. Reviewers note that its interface and setup are complex, requiring substantial training and expertise. For staff that value simplicity and fast adoption, ROH clearly has the edge.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen offers 10 unique features not found in ROH, including contactless payments, 3-D Secure, WeChatPay, AliPay, Paypal, dynamic currency conversion (DCC), MOTO payments, Klarna installment plans, gratuity functions, and multi-currency settlements. These features cater to global, multi-channel, and high-volume payment environments.
ROH provides a core set of 19 shared features with Adyen but lacks the additional payment methods and security options. Its strengths lie in automating invoices, scheduling payments, and delivering real-time notifications. While less feature-dense, ROH’s targeted functionalities support hotel-specific financial workflows.
For hotels needing advanced payment options and security features, Adyen's broader set offers more. If automation and streamlined invoicing are your priorities, ROH’s features will suffice.
Edge: Adyen.
ROH significantly outperforms Adyen in support ratings, with a 4.97/5 rating from 65 recent reviews and a 9.91/5 NPS score. Reviewers frequently mention how responsive and helpful their support team is, with one stating, “Support staff is great,” and “Onboarding was smooth thanks to their attentive support.”
Adyen scores 0/5 in support, indicating no recent reviews or available support ratings, which likely reflects its enterprise-level focus rather than hospitality. Given the high support scores and recent positive reviews, ROH clearly offers more reliable, hotel-focused customer support.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen boasts 46 verified integration partners, including major hospitality and payment systems like Oracle Hospitality, Trevo, Kwentra, RoomRaccoon, and ZUZU Hospitality. Its extensive network allows hotels to embed payments into existing infrastructure with ease.
ROH’s integration count is limited to just one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—though it covers core hotel operations. The platform’s main strength is in automating payments rather than extensive system integrations.
For hotels seeking a flexible, multi-system payment integration setup, Adyen’s ecosystem is the clear choice. If your focus is on internal automation without complex integrations, ROH’s single partner support may suffice.
Edge: Adyen.
ROH receives a 100/100 HT Score based on 65 recent reviews, with a 99% likelihood to recommend its platform. Hoteliers across various segments—especially luxury, boutique, and resort properties—praise its ease of use, support, and automation features. Many reviews highlight how ROH improves cash flow and simplifies financial workflows.
Adyen, with zero reviews, cannot be rated by hotel professionals. Its enterprise clients and large corporations tend to provide feedback, but this data does not directly reflect hotel-specific satisfaction.
Given the recent, high ratings and hotel-specific praise, ROH clearly enjoys stronger hotel industry acceptance.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen does not publish standard pricing; it operates on a custom model based on transaction volume and payment methods. This makes it difficult to estimate costs without direct vendor engagement.
ROH charges a flat $100 monthly fee, with no indication of additional transaction or setup fees. Its predictable pricing model allows hotels to budget easily.
Hotels preferring transparent, fixed costs should lean toward ROH. If your hotel has high transaction volumes and needs a customizable pricing structure, Adyen’s bespoke model may be more suitable, but it requires direct inquiry.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes simplicity and local payment methods only or operates on a limited budget, as Adyen’s setup may be complex and costly.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive global payment options, complex integrations, or operates at massive transaction volumes needing custom solutions.
Adyen offers a comprehensive, globally-scaled payments platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and support for multiple currencies. Its strengths are best leveraged by large, international hotels or chains that need diverse payment methods and system flexibility.
ROH provides a streamlined, hotel-specific payments and invoicing solution praised for its ease of use, automation, and support. It excels in simplifying payment workflows, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and quick onboarding.
In summary, if your hotel needs a globally capable, feature-rich enterprise system, Adyen is the better choice. If your focus is on operational simplicity, automation, and excellent support within a hospitality context, ROH is the superior option.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。
用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Adyen 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Adyen 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Adyen:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Adyen 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问