The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 78 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
AeroGuest 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Lobby Kiosk.
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 QR Codes and In-Venue Ordering.
基于 HTR 上 78 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 67 |
在分析了 78 条经验证的评价后,AeroGuest 用户最看重其 ,而 Crave Interactive 用户则强调 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 0 条评价 | #6 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 8 条评价 | #9 26 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #4 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 1 条评价 | #5 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 8 条评价 | #6 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #18 3 条评价 | #5 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #22 1 条评价 | #4 27 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #19 0 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #23 0 条评价 | #4 26 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 10 条评价 | #8 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #8 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #9 1 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
Choosing between AeroGuest Journey by AeroGuest and Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest engagement and operational automation. Both solutions aim to enhance guest experiences, but they approach this with different features, integrations, and usability models. Understanding their core strengths and limitations helps determine which best fits your property.
AeroGuest is designed to streamline hotel operations via deep PMS integration and offer comprehensive automation, while Crave focuses on engaging guests through in-venue ordering and mobile access. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both AeroGuest and Crave serve as guest apps but solve distinct hotel challenges. AeroGuest emphasizes automating check-in/out, PMS integration, and digital keys, reducing front desk workload and printing costs, thus fitting hotels seeking operational efficiency. Crave prioritizes guest engagement through in-venue ordering, QR codes, and service automation, making it ideal for properties wanting to boost food and beverage sales.
While AeroGuest boasts a 0/5 rating in the source, indicating limited review data, it has a high NPS score of 9.44/5 and more recent reviews. Crave, with 48 reviews and a 4.75/5 overall, provides more recent feedback showing strong user satisfaction. Do you value robust recent reviews and proven large-scale use?
If your hotel needs a full guest journey automation, especially with PMS integration, mobile check-in, and digital keys, AeroGuest is the clear choice. It’s best for hotels aiming to reduce front desk workload, streamline operations, and offer personalized pre-arrival interactions.
Conversely, if your focus is on increasing F&B sales, offering in-venue ordering, and engaging guests throughout their stay with mobile services, Crave is more suitable. Its strong reputation among properties that prioritize guest interaction and food service makes it preferable for hotels with active F&B outlets.
For boutique or city-center hotels looking for operational automation, AeroGuest’s extensive features and integrations make it appealing. For resorts, inns, or hotels emphasizing on-site guest services and food, Crave’s engaging interface and ordering capabilities fit better.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
AeroGuest scores slightly higher in ease of use, with a 4.78/5 rating compared to Crave’s 4.61/5. Its onboarding process and user interface receive consistent praise for simplicity, supporting staff adoption and guest usability. AeroGuest’s intuitive dashboards and straightforward guest flow are regularly highlighted in reviews.
Crave’s user interface is also highly rated, praised for being customizable and friendly, but some feedback notes it could benefit from a more modern design and easier menu management. Crave’s hardware durability and back-end complexity can sometimes hinder ease of use.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest offers a broad set of 20 unique features, including mobile check-in, PMS integration, self-service check-ins/out, digital room keys, guest segmentation, and loyalty integrations. Its ability to handle pre-arrival upselling, device independence, and in-app re-booking makes it a versatile operational tool.
Crave provides 5 exclusive features, notably QR codes, in-venue and multi-menu ordering, POS integration, and tipping. Its strengths lie in guest interaction points, especially food and beverage ordering and seamless in-venue service.
While AeroGuest’s extensive feature set caters to operational needs, Crave’s specialized offerings excel in guest engagement and F&B services. Which feature suite aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s customer support scores an impressive 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing the approachable, innovative team committed to continuous improvement. Users mention quick support responses and a proactive attitude, enhancing the onboarding and ongoing experience.
Crave’s customer support is equally strong, rated 4.79/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and dedicated support teams. Some feedback indicates that the back-end system could be modernized, but overall, support remains highly regarded.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified integration partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Stayntouch, supporting extensive hotel system connectivity. Integration with property management, payment, and hardware vendors underscores its operational versatility.
Crave offers 17 verified partners, including notable brands such as Allice, Amadeus, and Kipsu, with strong ties to F&B and guest communication systems. Shared partners like Oracle and Infor highlight some common ground.
AeroGuest’s broader and more diverse integration network positions it as the more flexible choice for multi-system hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
Crave boasts a higher overall rating of 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback affirming its ease of use, helpful support, and feature-rich platform. It is favored across luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, with a strong focus on F&B and guest engagement.
AeroGuest’s review count is minimal (9 reviews) and reviews are older or less detailed; it scores a perfect 0/5 in the overall rating, indicating limited data and experience. The high NPS and recent satisfaction signals favor Crave.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
AeroGuest does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a bespoke or enterprise-focused model. It typically involves direct negotiations, often with no implementation fee, but clarity requires direct contact.
Crave charges a straightforward $400 setup fee, with no monthly charges or hidden costs, making its pricing transparent and predictable. Both solutions are premium offerings, but Crave’s clear upfront pricing allows easier budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel has a limited budget or primarily needs F&B engagement tools without full operational automation.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs PMS integration or operational automation rather than guest-facing engagement.
AeroGuest is a comprehensive, automation-centric guest app with extensive integrations, making it ideal if your hotel seeks to streamline operations and reduce manual tasks. Its features support full digital guest journeys, from check-in to loyalty, with a focus on automation and system integration.
Crave is a highly rated, engagement-focused platform excelling in F&B and guest interaction within the hotel environment. Its strengths lie in mobile ordering, QR codes, and intuitive interfaces, making it perfect for hotels aiming to boost on-site sales and guest satisfaction.
Choose AeroGuest if operational efficiency and automation are your top priorities. Opt for Crave if maximizing guest engagement and F&B revenue is more aligned with your hotel’s strategy.
This comprehensive comparison aims to clarify which platform aligns with your hotel’s needs, helping you make an informed, confident decision.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,AeroGuest Journey 和 Crave Mobile Platform 共享 20 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| POS 集成 | ||
| 二维码 | ||
| 到货前追加销售和升级 | ||
| 多菜单订购 | ||
| 小费 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 经前管理系统整合 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AeroGuest Journey 和 Crave Mobile Platform 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。AeroGuest Journey 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。AeroGuest Journey 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AeroGuest Journey:否。Crave Mobile Platform:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AeroGuest 的 HT Score 为 0,Crave Interactive 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问