AeroGuest Journey vs. STAY Guest App: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 226 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 226 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

AeroGuest 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Lobby Kiosk.

STAY 表现出色 在 客户体验优化 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

AeroGuest Journey 与 STAY Guest App 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 226 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
47
推荐可能性
94%
96%
易用性
4.7/5
4.8/5
客户支持
4.9/5
4.8/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.6/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $300/mo
经验证的评价 11 215

AeroGuest Journey 与 STAY Guest App 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 226 条经验证的评价后,AeroGuest 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
优点
+ 客户体验优化
+ 移动和用户体验
+ 运营效率
+ 支持和服务
缺点
CMS 和定制
集成能力
分析和报告

AeroGuest 对比 STAY:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
小型(10-24 间客房) #29 0 条评价 #9 10 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #13 8 条评价 #4 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #18 2 条评价 #2 89 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #19 1 条评价 #2 24 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
精品酒店 #15 8 条评价 #2 77 条评价
豪华酒店 #18 3 条评价 #2 88 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #22 1 条评价 #3 91 条评价
长住酒店 #19 0 条评价 #6 7 条评价

按区域

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
北美 #23 0 条评价 #5 27 条评价
欧洲 #13 10 条评价 #3 112 条评价
亚太 #6 3 条评价
中东 #9 1 条评价 #7 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly influence your guests' experience and your operational efficiency. AeroGuest Journey by AeroGuest and STAY Guest App both aim to streamline hotel operations and enhance guest satisfaction, but they approach these goals differently. Your choice hinges on the specific needs of your hotel, your budget, and the scale at which you want to operate.

AeroGuest emphasizes deep integration with your property management system (PMS) and offers a broad suite of functionalities that automate check-in, check-out, and guest communication. STAY, meanwhile, provides a highly rated, user-friendly platform trusted by over 1,000 hotels worldwide, with a focus on simplifying guest access to hotel services through a mobile app. Which of these platforms aligns better with your hotel's operational priorities?

Is AeroGuest or STAY Better for Hotels?

Both AeroGuest and STAY target improving guest interaction and operational workflows, but their strengths differ. AeroGuest excels in full PMS integration, offering features like mobile check-in, mobile keys, and contactless payments, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing automation and seamless property management. STAY, with a substantial review base and a focus on guest experience, leans into ease of use and broad service digitization.

AeroGuest boasts a smaller review count (9 reviews) with recent feedback indicating its efficiency in automating payments and check-ins, but limited user data makes it riskier for larger-scale deployment. STAY’s 206 reviews, all recent, reinforce its status as a tested, proven solution. Do you prefer a platform with a proven track record and extensive user feedback or one with promising automation capabilities but limited reviews?

AeroGuest vs STAY: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs full PMS integration, mobile check-in, and contactless guest services, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its suite of unique features, including mobile room keys, device-agnostic access, and upselling tools, suits hotels looking to automate and personalize guest stays.

If your hotel seeks a simple, easy-to-implement app that enhances guest satisfaction through service digitization—like real-time updates, restaurant reservations, and request management—STAY is the smarter choice. Its extensive user base and proven results in reducing queues and improving operational efficiency make it ideal for mid to large-sized properties.

Is AeroGuest or STAY Easier to Use?

Both AeroGuest and STAY receive high ease-of-use ratings—4.78/5 in recent reviews—indicating a straightforward experience for staff and guests. AeroGuest’s onboarding is rated 4.67/5, with reviews praising its intuitive dashboards and seamless integration setup. Guests appreciate the mobile key and re-booking features, noting the system makes check-ins and payments smoother.

STAY’s platform is also lauded for being user-friendly, with a simple CMS and an app that guests find intuitive. Some reviews mention that STAY’s interface enables quick updates and easy management, even for technically less experienced staff. Given identical ease-of-use ratings, edge: AeroGuest for more integrated, automation-focused workflows.

Which Has Better Features: AeroGuest or STAY?

AeroGuest offers a significantly broader feature set, with 30 unique functionalities, including mobile check-in, PMS integration, NFC, contactless ordering, loyalty programs, and room upgrades. These features support a highly automated, contactless guest journey, making AeroGuest suitable for hotels aiming for a fully digital experience.

STAY provides only four exclusive features—chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and a mobile app—focusing more on guest communication and content delivery. Its strength lies in elevating operational communication rather than deep automation. Edge: AeroGuest for its comprehensive feature depth, especially in automation and integration.

Which Has Better Customer Support: AeroGuest or STAY?

AeroGuest’s support score (4.89/5) is slightly higher than STAY’s (4.83/5), with reviews highlighting approachable, innovative teams that assist swiftly. AeroGuest’s small review count (9) limits comprehensive insight, but existing feedback emphasizes personalized support and ongoing product improvements.

STAY’s support is also highly rated, with many users praising its quick response and helpful service. Some reviews note the absence of phone support and regional limitations, but overall, support remains reliable. Edge: AeroGuest, given its marginally higher score and focus on dedicated client engagement.

Which Has More Integrations: AeroGuest or STAY?

AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partner integrations, including major PMS providers like Mews, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality, alongside hardware partners like SALTO and dormakaba. It covers a wide array of functionalities from payment systems to door lock controls, supporting extensive automation.

STAY has 20 verified integrations, including popular systems like Hotelkit, Amadeus, and Winhotel, but fewer hardware partners. Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Oracle, but AeroGuest’s broader ecosystem makes it more adaptable for complex property setups. Edge: AeroGuest for its extensive integration network.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: AeroGuest or STAY?

Review counts heavily favor STAY, with 206 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3/5, compared to AeroGuest’s 9 reviews and 0/5 rating. Hotels using STAY—from large chains like NH Hotels to resorts like Dreams Natura—praise its ability to improve efficiency, reduce queues, and increase guest satisfaction.

AeroGuest’s limited reviews make it difficult to assess broad satisfaction, but the positive comments focus on its automation and innovation. Given the volume and recency of STAY reviews, edge: STAY.

How Much Do AeroGuest and STAY Cost?

AeroGuest does not publicly disclose pricing, which may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. It’s likely a higher-end investment, especially with a broad feature suite and deep PMS integration.

STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no implementation fees or tiered pricing. Its transparent, predictable pricing makes budgeting straightforward for hotels seeking scalable solutions. Given the lack of detailed AeroGuest pricing, edge: STAY for affordability and transparency.

What Type of Hotel Should Use AeroGuest?

  • Hotels that prioritize automation, such as mobile check-in, keyless entry, and upselling.
  • Properties with complex PMS setups needing tight integration.
  • Hotels aiming for a fully contactless, personalized guest journey.
  • Hotels with the budget for a premium, feature-rich platform.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is small or on a tight budget.
  • You prefer a simple, straightforward app without extensive automation.
  • Your property operates in regions with limited technical support for deep integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAY?

  • Hotels looking for an easy-to-deploy digital guest experience.
  • Properties that want to improve operational flow and reduce front desk queues.
  • Hotels of all sizes, especially chains and resorts, seeking proven solutions.
  • Hotels prioritizing guest communication, reservations, and feedback.

Not ideal if:

  • You need deep PMS integration or automation features.
  • Your hotel requires extensive hardware control or custom functionalities.
  • You operate in regions with limited language options or support hours.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Core difference: AeroGuest emphasizes automation, deep PMS integration, and a broad feature set, while STAY focuses on simplifying guest-facing services with proven operational benefits.

When to choose AeroGuest: If automation, contactless check-in, and integrations are your top priorities, AeroGuest’s extensive capabilities make it the best choice. Its suite of 30 features supports a highly digital, personalized guest journey suitable for larger, tech-forward hotels.

When to choose STAY: If your goal is to improve operational efficiency quickly, reduce queues, and provide a simple, intuitive guest app, STAY’s proven track record and large user base make it the ideal solution. Its focus on core guest experiences delivers measurable ROI for a range of property types.

Final verdict: AeroGuest’s suite of automation tools makes it the stronger choice if your hotel needs a deeply integrated, feature-rich platform. However, STAY’s extensive, recent reviews and proven success in streamlining hotel operations position it as the more reliable pick for most hoteliers seeking a trusted guest app today.

AeroGuest Journey 和 STAY Guest App 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
Starting Price From $300/mo

AeroGuest Journey 有哪些 STAY Guest App 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,AeroGuest Journey 和 STAY Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 AeroGuest AeroGuest STAY STAY
到货前追加销售和升级
手机值机
消息路由
移动应用
符合 PCI 标准
经前管理系统整合
聊天机器人
自动回复
设备无关
轻松选择房间

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 22 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:AeroGuest 对比 STAY(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
AeroGuest AeroGuest

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY Barceló Hoteles 大型
+ Room Service is faster. It's more comfortable. For the guests. And for the staff too
+ Barceló can make better decisions in real time
+ Through live surveys, Barceló can detect pain points more easily and streamline processes

"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."

Álvaro Montalvo
Álvaro Montalvo
Project Manager Innovation
改善宾客体验
AeroGuest AeroGuest

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY AMR Collection 中型
+ The app pays for itself according to AMR's Product Manager. "Spa services, gourmet dinners, wine sales, and other premium services have seen significant increases since we implemented the app.
+ The implementation of STAY skyrocketed the number of users of AMR's app. Increasing them by 50% was their goal. However, they "far exceeded that goal.
+ AMR's users rate the app 4.7 out of 5 on average. The app has been downloaded tens of thousands of times in 50 AMR hotels.

"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."

Yudy Mora
Yudy Mora
Product Owner Manager

AeroGuest 对比 STAY:总结

AeroGuest
AeroGuest
4.7/5 来自 11 条评价

排名更高的方面

GB #5 vs #7

独特功能

手机值机 经前管理系统整合 符合 PCI 标准 轻松选择房间 到货前追加销售和升级
4.8/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 26 个集成
查看资料
STAY
STAY
4.8/5 来自 215 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户体验优化 97% 正面

多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。

移动和用户体验 90% 正面

该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。

运营效率 96% 正面

STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

CMS 和定制 41% 负面

CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。

集成能力 50% 负面

用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #2 vs #18
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #13
小型(10-24 间客房) #9 vs #29
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #19

独特功能

移动应用 聊天机器人 自动回复 消息路由
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 20 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 STAY 3.0 vs 0.0 (+3)

关于 AeroGuest Journey 与 STAY Guest App 的常见问题

AeroGuest Journey 能否替代 STAY Guest App?

这取决于您的需求。AeroGuest Journey 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。AeroGuest Journey 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

AeroGuest Journey 或 STAY Guest App 是否提供免费方案?

AeroGuest Journey:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 AeroGuest Journey 和 STAY Guest App?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AeroGuest 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息