The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 133 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Meal plans and Stripe.
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 133 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 38 | 95 |
在分析了 133 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 支持服务, 用户友好界面, 渠道管理,而 Amadeus 用户则强调 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
实时更新
▾
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
−
照片管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #14 18 条评价 | #22 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #15 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #40 0 条评价 | #7 26 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #9 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #30 4 条评价 | #17 32 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 10 条评价 | #12 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #28 3 条评价 | #10 34 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #20 2 条评价 | #7 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #19 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 23 条评价 | #16 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #18 0 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
Both Aiosell and Amadeus offer booking engines designed to boost direct bookings and streamline hotel operations. While they share common features like multi-channel integration and mobile responsiveness, they differ significantly in their market presence, customer support, and feature depth. As a hotelier ready to choose, your decision hinges on priorities: simplicity and recent performance favor Aiosell, while extensive integrations and global reach favor Amadeus.
Aiosell’s focus on ease of use and affordability has earned it a dedicated user base, but Amadeus’s broader feature set and larger market footprint appeal to larger, globally dispersed properties. Which of these systems aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth ambitions?
Aiosell and Amadeus are both designed to improve direct booking rates, yet they approach this goal differently. Aiosell emphasizes a straightforward, user-friendly interface that simplifies booking management, while Amadeus offers a more complex, feature-rich platform aimed at maximizing revenue through advanced merchandising tools.
Recent reviews show Aiosell with over 26 reviews, primarily recent, giving it a more current snapshot of user satisfaction. Amadeus, with 93 reviews, provides a broader historical perspective but fewer recent comments. This makes Aiosell’s data more relevant for today’s decision-making. Are you prioritizing ease of use or extensive functionality?
If your hotel needs a simple, affordable booking engine that minimizes staff training and integrates easily with other platforms, go with Aiosell. It suits boutique hotels, small chains, and properties seeking a quick-to-deploy solution that boosts direct bookings without overwhelming staff.
If you require a comprehensive booking engine with advanced features like loyalty program integration, A/B testing, and multi-room booking, choose Amadeus. It’s better suited for larger hotel groups, properties with complex revenue management needs, or those looking to leverage detailed analytics and market intelligence.
For a small to mid-sized hotel prioritizing simplicity and budget, Aiosell is the clear pick. For a larger hotel or chain seeking advanced marketing and revenue tools, Amadeus is the more strategic choice.
Aiosell’s interface has a high usability rating of 4.92/5, with users praising its simplicity and quick staff onboarding. Multiple reviews emphasize how easy it is to train staff and manage bookings without technical expertise, highlighting the platform’s accessibility.
Amadeus scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with some users describing its platform as complex but manageable with ongoing training. Support responses have been mixed, and some report initial complexity as a barrier.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell offers six unique features, including meal plans, Stripe integration, Facebook conversion tracking, room substitutions, pooled inventory, and social media bookings, tailoring to smaller hotels seeking specific functionalities. In contrast, Amadeus has ten exclusive features, including urgency messaging, booking abandonment campaigns, loyalty program integration, ADA compliance, A/B testing, and wedding/corporate modules, catering to larger, flexibility-driven hotels.
Both systems share 26 features, but Amadeus’s broader suite supports more complex revenue and marketing strategies. If your hotel needs targeted social media or flexible payment options, Aiosell’s specialized features are advantageous; for advanced marketing and testing, Amadeus is stronger.
Edge: Amadeus.
Aiosell’s customer support ratings are notably high at 4.92/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance that makes onboarding and troubleshooting smoother. Users frequently mention the support team’s responsiveness and helpfulness.
Amadeus supports are rated lower at 3.22/5, with reviews citing delayed responses and difficulties resolving issues promptly. Despite its extensive resources, some users find Amadeus support less responsive than Aiosell.
Edge: Aiosell.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including major players like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and RevControl, providing extensive connectivity options. Aiosell offers 12 verified partners, including popular systems like STAAH, Hotelogix, and HyperGuest, but with fewer options overall.
Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Oracle Hospitality, but Amadeus’s larger partner network supports more complex, multi-system environments. If your hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of third-party solutions, Amadeus provides more flexibility.
Edge: Amadeus.
Aiosell’s recent reviews highlight its simplicity and affordability, especially appreciated by boutique and small hotels, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a 9.81/10 NPS score. Its ease of onboarding and responsiveness resonate strongly with small to midsize properties.
Amadeus’s reviews, though fewer in recent months, reflect high satisfaction among larger hotels and chains, particularly for revenue and marketing features, with a 87% likelihood to recommend and an 8.58/10 NPS score. Larger hotels value its advanced tools, despite some support frustrations.
Overall, Aiosell’s ratings are more current and higher across key satisfaction metrics, making it the preferred choice for smaller and mid-sized hotels.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s pricing starts at $100 per month, with no freemium model or implementation fees, making it transparent and budget-friendly. Pricing for Amadeus is not publicly disclosed, typical of larger enterprise systems, often involving customized quotes based on property size and needs.
Given Aiosell’s straightforward pricing and no additional hidden costs, smaller hotels can easily budget for it. For larger properties or groups needing extensive customization, Amadeus’s pricing structure may be more suited but less transparent.
Aiosell is a straightforward, budget-friendly booking engine with high recent satisfaction scores, ideal for boutique hotels and small chains. Its focus on ease of use, good support, and affordability makes it a compelling choice for properties seeking quick wins in direct bookings.
Amadeus offers a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and a global presence, suited for larger, complex hotel operations that need advanced revenue management, marketing, and analytics. Its larger market footprint and integration depth make it more appropriate for big hotel groups or properties with sophisticated operational needs.
If your hotel values simplicity, rapid deployment, and recent positive reviews, Aiosell is the better option. If you require extensive customization, advanced marketing, and a broad ecosystem, Amadeus is the stronger choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Booking Engine 和 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 条纹 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Aiosell 的支持团队因其响应速度和专业精神而备受好评。他们的周到服务和快速解决问题的能力让用户感到安心。尽管总体上令人满意,但偶尔也会收到一些关于特定技... Aiosell 的支持团队因其响应速度和专业精神而备受好评。他们的周到服务和快速解决问题的能力让用户感到安心。尽管总体上令人满意,但偶尔也会收到一些关于特定技术咨询响应延迟的反馈。
评论者一致称赞 Aiosell 的用户友好型设计,这有助于减少员工的培训时间。该平台布局直观,方便不同技术背景的用户轻松上手,为酒店运营管理提供直观的体验。
Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地... Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地满足多样化的运营需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地... Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地满足多样化的运营需求。
虽然Aiosell提供了丰富的报告生成选项,但用户表示需要更全面、更可定制的报告工具。添加更详细、更针对行业的报告,可以极大地帮助酒店管理的决策过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Booking Engine 和 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Booking Engine 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aiosell - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Booking Engine:否。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 77,Amadeus 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问