The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 548 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Referral Reporting.
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Pooled inventory and Gift Vouchers.
基于 HTR 上 548 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 95 | 453 |
在分析了 548 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户则强调 integration with pms and channel manager, 预订流程和可用性, 直接预订和收入。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Integration with PMS and Channel Manager
▾
|
|
+
增加收入
▾
|
+
预订流程和可用性
▾
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
直接预订和收入
▾
|
|
+
高级报告和分析
▾
|
+
实时库存和定价
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
移动兼容性
▾
|
|
−
复杂性和可用性问题
▾
|
−
定制和品牌
▾
|
|
−
功能实现滞后
▾
|
−
交叉销售和追加销售工具
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | #2 252 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #7 99 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #13 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | #5 159 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #5 203 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | #7 69 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #13 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #5 48 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #28 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | #3 342 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s growth, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and Yanolja Cloud Solution aim to boost direct bookings and simplify management, but they target different hotel profiles and offer distinct features. With Yanolja’s significantly higher review count and more recent feedback, it currently holds a stronger position in the market. Are you prepared to prioritize scale and support, or do you need advanced analytics and customization?
Both Amadeus and Yanolja address the core need for a reliable online booking platform, yet they diverge in scope and market focus. Amadeus’s iHotelier® leans toward larger, more traditional hotel brands with complex revenue management needs, offering advanced features like booking abandonment recapture and Google Hotel Ads integration. Yanolja, by contrast, emphasizes ease of use and flexibility, especially for smaller hotels, resorts, and vacation rentals. Given the recent surge in reviews and ratings for Yanolja, its platform is currently more aligned with hotels seeking rapid deployment and broad support.
While Amadeus has a longstanding reputation in the global hospitality industry, its reviews reveal concerns about customer support responsiveness and interface complexity. Conversely, Yanolja’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive design and exceptional support, making it more appealing for hoteliers prioritizing simplicity and quick onboarding. Do you want a platform with sophisticated analytics and extensive integrations, or a straightforward, user-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-integrate booking engine that supports a range of accommodation types, Yanolja is the better fit. Its lower price point ($100/month) combined with a strong review score (92.4/100) and superior customer support (4.78/5) appeal to small-to-mid-sized hotels, resorts, and vacation rentals looking for quick wins and operational support.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires advanced features such as booking abandonment recovery, A/B testing, and extensive third-party integrations—especially if you operate in multiple regions or segments—Amadeus’s iHotelier® is worth considering. Despite its higher complexity and mixed reviews on support, it offers 17 unique features not found in Yanolja, making it suitable for larger or enterprise-level properties.
Yanolja consistently outperforms Amadeus in ease-of-use ratings, with a score of 4.76/5 compared to Amadeus’s 4.25/5. Recent reviews praise Yanolja’s clean, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and responsive support staff, describing it as “super easy and user-friendly.” Conversely, Amadeus’s platform, while functional, is viewed as more complicated and requires a steeper learning curve, with some users noting that it can be “a little complicated to understand” initially.
The onboarding process also favors Yanolja, which scores 4.71/5 against Amadeus’s 4.01/5, thanks to dedicated support teams and streamlined training. Edge: Yanolja.
Amadeus has a clear edge with 17 features exclusive to its platform, including advanced tools like conversion rate reports, Google Hotel Ads bookings, and customizable add-ons. These features cater to hotels that want granular control over pricing, marketing, and guest engagement strategies.
Yanolja offers only three features unique to its solution—pooled inventory, gift vouchers, and social media integration—yet these are highly effective for smaller hotels and vacation rentals seeking simplicity. Its core strength lies in delivering essential booking functions with less complexity. Edge: Amadeus.
Yanolja’s support scores (4.78/5) dramatically surpass Amadeus’s (3.22/5), with reviews describing its team as “spectacular,” “cheerful,” and “very helpful.” Many customers express frustration with Amadeus’s slow response times and inconsistent service, which can hinder problem resolution and training.
Yanolja’s dedicated support team and quick response times have earned high praise, translating into more confident adoption and smoother operations. For hoteliers who prioritize support quality, Yanolja clearly leads. Edge: Yanolja.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Profitroom, and RevControl, with 23 shared partners with Yanolja. Yanolja’s platform integrates with 157 verified partners, including Xero, QuickBooks, and GuestTraction, offering broader flexibility for diverse PMS and channel management needs.
Both platforms connect with major third-party systems, but Yanolja’s wider partner network makes it more adaptable, especially for multi-channel and multi-property setups. When considering future integrations, Yanolja’s larger ecosystem is appealing. Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s overall rating (4.63/5) and NPS score (9.49/10) reflect its strong recent reviews, especially from boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Its high likelihood to recommend (95%) underscores high satisfaction among hotels seeking simplicity and support.
Amadeus has a respectable score (4.39/5) and an NPS of 8.58/10, mostly from larger hotels and more traditional segments. However, the recent reviews favor Yanolja’s ease of use and customer support, making it the preferred choice for most hoteliers today. Edge: Yanolja.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing but notes there is no free tier or trial, implying customized quotes. Yanolja offers a straightforward $100/month fee with no implementation charges, making it transparent and accessible for smaller hotels.
The lack of visible pricing for Amadeus may be a barrier for small to mid-sized hotels, while Yanolja’s predictable, low-cost model appeals to budget-conscious properties. Pricing clarity favors Yanolja. Edge: Yanolja.
Not ideal if your hotel is smaller, with limited staff or budget, or if you prefer straightforward setup and support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced customization, complex analytics, or extensive integrations that go beyond basic booking needs.
Yanolja’s platform excels in simplicity, support, and cost-effectiveness, making it an excellent choice for hotels seeking rapid, reliable results with less technical hassle. Its higher review scores and broader integration network give it an edge for many hotels, especially those in the small to mid-market segment.
Amadeus offers a more feature-rich solution with advanced tools that appeal to larger, more sophisticated properties or chains. However, its support and usability challenges mean it’s best suited for properties with dedicated tech teams or those needing detailed revenue management.
For most hoteliers today, especially those valuing ease of use and support, Yanolja is the safer, more scalable option. If your hotel demands advanced marketing, analytics, and multi-region support, Amadeus remains a strong contender—despite its higher complexity.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We can now manage every property in our franchise from a single dashboard, track performance instantly, and know that our team has 24/7 support whenever it’s needed. It has complet..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-... Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-time updates and eliminating risks of manual error and overbookings. This functionality enhances both front-office and back-end processes, helping hotels to save time and reduce reliance on third-party platforms.
用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动... 用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动设备上,从而确保更佳的宾客体验。
该引擎被证明能够有效增加直接预订量,降低支付给OTA的佣金,从而保障酒店收入。用户称赞其用户友好的设计,能够有效吸引直接流量访问酒店网站。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集... 虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集成尤其值得一提,是一项亟待改进的功能。
尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,... 尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,并提升移动端预订的获取率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Yanolja Booking Engine 提供 157 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Yanolja Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Yanolja Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Yanolja Cloud Solution 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问