The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 80 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Mobile App.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 80 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 46 | 34 |
在分析了 80 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 seamless integration and usability, 支持和客户服务, channel management,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进空间
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
报告和可定制性
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #49 0 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #40 0 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #32 9 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #32 3 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #30 4 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #34 2 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #45 0 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 29 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between Aiosell Property Management System (PMS) by Aiosell Technologies and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group involves evaluating their core functionalities, user experiences, and strategic fit for your hotel. Both platforms aim to simplify hotel operations, enhance guest experiences, and increase revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, regional needs, and budget.
Aiosell is renowned for its straightforward, affordable solution, primarily favored by independent and boutique hotels seeking ease of use and automation. Shiji Daylight, on the other hand, offers a more extensive feature set with robust integrations and scalability, often preferred by larger hotel groups. Which one aligns best with your specific needs?
Both Aiosell and Shiji aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their approach. Aiosell’s focus is on simplicity, affordability, and an all-in-one, user-friendly interface that minimizes training time. Shiji offers a comprehensive, modular system with advanced automation, integrations, and detailed analytics, suited for complex operations.
Aiosell’s recent reviews, with a higher score of 76.64 and 36 reviews—three in the last six months—give it a stronger data foundation. Shiji’s slightly lower score of 75, with 32 reviews, mostly older, makes its current standing less certain. Do you prefer a plug-and-play system or a customizable, scalable platform?
If your hotel is an independent property or a boutique with limited staff and operational simplicity, Aiosell is likely the better fit. It offers an intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and includes essential modules like CRM, booking engine, channel management, and revenue tools—ideal for hotels needing an all-in-one solution without complexity.
Conversely, if your hotel is part of a chain, has multiple properties, or requires extensive integrations, Shiji is the more suitable choice. It provides over 54 unique features, including advanced guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, and detailed reporting—perfect for large operations that prioritize automation and data-driven decisions.
Aiosell scores a nearly perfect 4.75 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and quick learning curve. Users highlight how staff, even with minimal training, can manage reservations, reports, and channel distribution efficiently.
Shiji follows closely with a 4.63 rating, praised for its modern, clean design and accessible training materials, including videos. However, some users note occasional sluggishness and customization limitations that can slightly hinder user experience.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s features are focused on core hotel operations, with five unique modules: guest CRM, booking engine, channel manager, mobile app, and revenue management. These are tailored for straightforward management and automation, providing essential tools without complex extras.
Shiji offers a broader range—54 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, task management, digital registration, automated reminders, payment requests, and more. Its extensive feature set supports large-scale, multi-property management with detailed reporting, advanced automation, and integrations.
Edge: Shiji.
Both products are supported by dedicated teams, but Aiosell reviews often highlight a higher support rating of 4.75/5, with comments about quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance. Users value the responsiveness, which ensures smooth daily operations.
Shiji's support ratings are slightly lower at 4.53/5, but users praise the comprehensive training materials and knowledgeable staff. Some note, however, that support could be more responsive during peak times and that onboarding might take longer.
Edge: Aiosell.
Shiji boasts 64 verified integrations, including major partners like Amadeus, Oracle, and Duetto, supporting large-scale, multi-system environments. Its API-everything approach simplifies connecting with other hotel tech solutions.
Aiosell has 12 verified partners, with notable integrations like Oracle and Hotelogix, mainly serving smaller or regional markets. While more limited, these integrations cover essential systems for independent hotels.
Edge: Shiji.
Aiosell’s reviews reflect a higher overall rating and recent positive feedback, especially from boutique and independent hotels. Hoteliers appreciate its simplicity and automation, with a 97% likelihood to recommend.
Shiji’s ratings are slightly lower and more varied, with some users citing performance issues and customization constraints. Larger hotel groups tend to rate it favorably, but individual properties give mixed reviews.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s pricing starts at $100 per month, with no implementation or hidden fees, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. Shiji’s base price is about $1,200 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level features and scalability.
While Aiosell’s lower price point appeals to budget-conscious properties, Shiji’s higher cost is justified if your hotel needs advanced automation, integrations, and multi-property management.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Aiosell offers a simple, affordable, all-in-one PMS designed for small to mid-sized properties, prioritizing ease of use and automation. Shiji provides a feature-rich, scalable platform suited for larger operations needing extensive integrations and customization.
If your hotel values quick deployment, lower cost, and straightforward management, go with Aiosell, which excels in ease of use and recent positive reviews. For larger, multi-property hotels demanding comprehensive features and extensive integrations, Shiji is the more suitable choice, despite its higher price.
Choose Aiosell if your focus is on simplicity and affordability. Opt for Shiji if you need scalability and advanced automation. Your ideal solution depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 44 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
Aiosell 的支持团队经常被称赞为响应迅速、解决问题高效。这种可靠的支持确保了操作的顺畅,并在需要时提供帮助,从而为用户带来了积极的体验。
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Aiosell 总体上受到好评,但用户指出了潜在的增长领域,例如提供更灵活的集成选项、改进移动应用程序体验以及提供更高级的错误修复和定制。
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Property Management System 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aiosell - Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Property Management System:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 78,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问