The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #4 17 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 18 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #19 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #16 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 17 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 10 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 41 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | — | #16 1 条评价 |
Choosing a contactless check-in platform involves understanding what your hotel needs most—whether it's seamless communication, automation, or straightforward self-service check-in. Akia Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 aim to fulfill these roles but differ significantly in their features, user feedback, and market focus. Your decision hinges on which solution aligns best with your operational goals and guest experience priorities.
Akia offers a broad set of features with a strong emphasis on guest communication and automation, supported by more recent reviews and a higher review count. Conversely, Sezam24 provides a simple, self-service check-in experience praised for its ease of use but has fewer recent reviews and features. So, which platform suits your hotel best?
Both Akia and Sezam24 address the need for contactless check-in, but they approach it differently. Akia emphasizes guest communication, automation, and integration, enabling hotels to manage guest interactions before, during, and after their stay, which helps improve reputation and operational efficiency. Sezam24 focuses primarily on self-service check-in kiosks, allowing guests to check in independently with minimal staff involvement.
While Akia's platform is richer in features and integrations, Sezam24 offers a straightforward, no-fuss check-in process that caters to budget-friendly, small hotels. Akia’s versatility suits hotels seeking a comprehensive communication platform, whereas Sezam24 is ideal for properties prioritizing quick, self-serve check-in. Do you need a full communication suite or just a self-service kiosk?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive guest communication system with automation, integrations, and guest history, Akia is the clear choice. Its 38 reviews—more recent than Sezam24’s—highlight its strengths in automating responses, managing team communication, and integrating with PMS systems, making it suitable for hotels that value operational efficiency and guest engagement.
If your hotel’s main focus is providing a simple, self-service check-in experience with minimal staff involvement and straightforward technology, Sezam24 fits better. Its single review praises its accuracy and ease of use, making it an attractive option for small, budget-conscious hotels. For a hotel seeking broad guest communication features, Akia is the better fit; for straightforward self-check-in, Sezam24 is sufficient.
Akia has a solid user rating of 4.82/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its simplicity once set up and its helpful onboarding process. However, some users mention occasional app glitches and the need for a better interface for filtering guest threads. Its onboarding is rated at 4.67/5, indicating a smooth initial experience but room for improvement.
Sezam24 is rated a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviewers describing its self-check-in kiosks as straightforward and reliable, requiring little training. Its focus on simplicity at the guest touchpoint makes it ideal for properties wanting quick adoption.
Edge: Sezam24.
Akia boasts 19 unique features not available in Sezam24, including mobile-friendly design, chatbot booking, WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger integrations, automated replies, guest history, PMS integration, and pre-arrival upselling. These extra tools support more personalized, automated guest communication and operational management.
Sezam24 offers just one unique feature: a hotel website check-in portal, focusing solely on self-service check-in without additional communication tools. This makes Akia significantly more feature-rich and versatile for hotels looking for a comprehensive contactless solution.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s customer support is rated 4.86/5, with reviews praising its knowledgeable staff and quick responses. One user mentions, “Getting ahold of a representative has been, by far, the easiest and best customer service we have ever experienced,” indicating strong post-sale support.
Sezam24’s support is rated a perfect 5/5, with feedback emphasizing reliability and professionalism, although fewer recent reviews make it harder to gauge ongoing support quality.
Edge: Sezam24.
Akia has 32 verified integrations, including popular PMS systems like Mews, Cloudbeds, and WebRezPro, as well as keyless entry via FLEXIPASS and RoomRaccoon. This extensive partner network allows Akia to connect seamlessly with most hotel tech stacks.
Sezam24 has 9 verified integrations, including Hotek, WuBook, and Onity, but fewer options overall. Shared integrations with Akia include major PMS providers, but Akia’s broader ecosystem provides more flexibility.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s overall rating of 4.95/5 is supported by 38 reviews, mostly recent, with hoteliers praising its ease of communication, automation, and positive impact on reputation. The average property segment ratings are high, especially for boutique hotels and independent properties.
Sezam24 holds a perfect 5/5 rating from one review, praising its reliability for small, budget hotels. However, with only one review, its rating isn’t as representative of broader hotel experiences.
Edge: Akia.
Akia does not disclose a specific pricing structure; its model appears to be customized, possibly based on hotel size or needs. It does not offer a freemium option, and no trial info is available, which suggests a tailored quote process.
Sezam24 charges a flat rate of $300 for its platform, with no mention of ongoing subscription fees or trial options. This straightforward pricing makes it easy to budget but may lack flexibility for larger hotels.
Akia is a comprehensive guest communication platform that significantly enhances operational efficiency and guest experience, especially for hotels seeking automation and integrations. Its broad feature set, high review count, and recent positive feedback make it the stronger choice for medium to large hotels or those with complex operational needs.
Sezam24 offers a straightforward, self-service check-in solution that’s ideal for small, budget-friendly hotels focusing on basic automation. Its ease of use and lower price point suit properties with minimal need for communication or integrations.
If your hotel seeks a versatile, feature-rich platform that can grow with your needs, Akia is the clear winner. For simple, cost-effective self-service check-in, Sezam24 will meet your needs.
In conclusion: choose Akia if automation, integrations, and guest engagement are priorities. Pick Sezam24 if a straightforward, budget-friendly check-in solution suffices for your hotel.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Automation emphasizes the guests experience at their fingertips. Akia closes the gap of missed opportunities by acting as a liaison to our guest satisfaction efforts. We have been..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
信息系统因方便与客人进行实时沟通、提高服务质量而受到好评。它帮助员工及时处理客人的要求和问题,从而对客人满意度和运营效率产生积极影响。
内部团队沟通和任务管理功能被强调为显著优势。这些工具可帮助酒店员工高效协调、跟踪任务并更有效地管理客人需求。用户认为这些系统的清晰度和可用性还有待提高... 内部团队沟通和任务管理功能被强调为显著优势。这些工具可帮助酒店员工高效协调、跟踪任务并更有效地管理客人需求。用户认为这些系统的清晰度和可用性还有待提高。
评论者一致赞赏 Akia 的非接触式入住功能,称它使入住过程变得无缝且高效。此功能减少了肢体接触,简化了客人的入住体验,并确保遵守卫生准则,这在疫情期间尤为... 评论者一致赞赏 Akia 的非接触式入住功能,称它使入住过程变得无缝且高效。此功能减少了肢体接触,简化了客人的入住体验,并确保遵守卫生准则,这在疫情期间尤为重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户都强调 Akia 自动回复的好处,因为它可以节省时间和精力。然而,一些评论提到这些自动回复有时可能不准确或不合时宜,给客人带来困惑,需要工作人员手动... 许多用户都强调 Akia 自动回复的好处,因为它可以节省时间和精力。然而,一些评论提到这些自动回复有时可能不准确或不合时宜,给客人带来困惑,需要工作人员手动干预。
用户欣赏 Akia 与 PMS 和其他系统的集成能力,但希望能够有所改进,例如无缝信用卡交易集成和更好的同步功能,以消除重复工作和手动数据输入。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Akia Contactless Check-In 和 Sezam24 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。Akia Contactless Check-In 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sezam24 提供 9 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sezam24 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Akia Contactless Check-In:否。Sezam24:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Akia 的 HT Score 为 63,Sezam24 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问