The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 46 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 54 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #16 4 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 5 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 46 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 21 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 36 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 15 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 119 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #9 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #14 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Akia by Akia and Loopon In-Stay for your hotel’s guest messaging requires understanding what each platform excels at and how they differ. Both serve to improve guest communication, but Akia’s AI-driven automation and extensive features contrast with Loopon’s streamlined, all-in-one guest feedback and communication system. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize robust automation or holistic feedback management.
Akia aims to automate and personalize guest interactions across multiple channels, whereas Loopon focuses on consolidating guest feedback and communication into a single, easy-to-use platform. Which type of system better aligns with your hotel’s operational style?
Akia is a powerful guest engagement platform with a focus on automation and cross-channel messaging, boasting a high HTR Score of about 66 and over 113 reviews, making it the more reviewed option. Loopon, however, has only 1 review and an HTR Score of 0, making Akia’s user feedback more recent and reliable.
Akia’s features include AI-powered responses, guest pre-registration, and mobile-friendly messaging, while Loopon excels at integrating all aspects of guest communication without requiring downloads. Both platforms aim to enhance guest satisfaction, but Akia’s extensive feature set and proven hotel use cases give it a decisive edge.
Are you more interested in automating guest interactions or consolidating feedback?
If your hotel needs advanced automation, AI-driven responses, and integrations with PMS and messaging channels, go with Akia. It’s suitable for hotels of various sizes and segments, especially those prioritizing operational efficiency and guest engagement.
If your hotel prefers a unified guest communication system that emphasizes feedback, reputation management, and a single conversation thread, Loopon is the better choice. It appears most suited to hotels focused on monitoring guest sentiment and improving service through direct feedback, especially in limited-service properties.
For hotels seeking automation and rich integrations, Akia is the clear winner. Conversely, if a holistic feedback approach aligns better with your goals, Loopon may serve you better.
Akia’s ease of use is reflected in a 4.84/5 rating, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how staff and guests find Akia’s platform user-friendly, with real-time communication and automation making daily operations smoother.
Loopon also scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its simplicity, reliability, and clarity in providing guest feedback over multiple channels. However, Loopon’s more limited feature scope might result in a less complex interface, making it slightly easier to adopt.
Edge: Loopon.
Akia offers over 59 features, including automated replies, guest history, SMS and WhatsApp integration, digital check-in, AI-driven analytics, and extensive upsell capabilities. Its feature set supports a wide range of operational needs, from pre-arrival to post-stay engagement.
Loopon, however, provides an all-in-one communication system that consolidates pre-stay emails, in-stay chat, feedback, reputation management, and post-stay marketing. It’s more streamlined but lacks the granular automation features and AI tools that Akia offers.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s support ratings stand out with a 4.84/5 score, and reviews often mention its quick, friendly, and helpful support team, with comments like “support is always easy to get.” Users appreciate the onboarding process and ongoing assistance, despite some integration hiccups.
Loopon also scores a perfect 5/5 for support, with reviews praising its reliability and ease of getting help. However, because Loopon has only one recent review, the robustness of its support system is less established.
Edge: Akia.
Akia integrates with 32 verified partners, including major PMS and property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and WebRezPro, supporting a wide range of operational tools. Loopon’s 11 verified partners include popular solutions like Sirvoy and Protel, with some overlap.
Shared integrations include Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but Akia’s broader partner network provides more flexibility for larger or more complex hotel setups. This extensive integration ecosystem favors Akia.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s overall rating of 4.93/5 with 113 reviews reflects a strong, recent positive reception from diverse hotel segments, especially boutique and resort hotels, with an average review rating of 4.94/5 among independent hotels. Its recent reviews reinforce its market presence and user satisfaction.
Loopon, with only one recent review, cannot confidently claim high ratings across segments. Its limited data makes it difficult to evaluate overall hotel satisfaction, but the existing review is very positive.
Edge: Akia.
Akia charges a base price of $500 per month, with no freemium or trial options, positioning itself as a premium solution with extensive features. Loopon’s pricing is not publicly available, but its focus on an all-in-one platform suggests a potentially different cost structure.
Without specific pricing details for Loopon, Akia’s clear pricing model provides better transparency for budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel relies on minimal automation or has limited budget for advanced features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation, AI responses, or advanced integrations.
Akia’s core advantage lies in its extensive features, AI automation, and proven track record with diverse hotel segments, supported by a large number of recent reviews. It’s the more trusted choice for hotels aiming to automate, upsell, and elevate guest experiences.
Loopon’s strength is its unified, feedback-focused platform that excels in reputation management and guest insight, suitable for hotels primarily interested in guest sentiment and streamlined communication.
If your hotel values automation and rich integrations, Akia is the clear choice. For those seeking a simple, feedback-driven system, Loopon can fulfill that need, but Akia’s more comprehensive platform makes it the more compelling option overall.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Automation emphasizes the guests experience at their fingertips. Akia closes the gap of missed opportunities by acting as a liaison to our guest satisfaction efforts. We have been..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Akia 的消息传递功能,强调它如何与客人无缝沟通,以提出请求、办理入住手续和解决问题。许多人指出,能够通过文本处理所有事情可以提高效率和与客... 用户经常称赞 Akia 的消息传递功能,强调它如何与客人无缝沟通,以提出请求、办理入住手续和解决问题。许多人指出,能够通过文本处理所有事情可以提高效率和与客人的互动。
Akia 的人工智能自动回复收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然它能处理简单的查询并节省时间,但一些用户指出,回复不准确和不恰当,需要后续人工干预。有人呼吁改进学习算... Akia 的人工智能自动回复收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然它能处理简单的查询并节省时间,但一些用户指出,回复不准确和不恰当,需要后续人工干预。有人呼吁改进学习算法,并简化报告不满意回复的方法。
Akia 能够有效地收集客人在入住期间和入住后的即时反馈。用户报告称,这种实时沟通有助于及时解决问题,从而提高在线评论和客人满意度分数。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
约有一半的评论者表示,聊天机器人功能有些许不足,有时会误解客人的问题并发送不恰当的回复。这些不准确的信息需要人工监督和干预。
一些评论强调需要改进信用卡授权功能。用户提到,目前他们需要依靠第三方解决方案来安全地捕获和处理信用卡交易。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Akia 和 Loopon In-Stay 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Akia 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Loopon In-Stay 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Loopon In-Stay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Akia:否。Loopon In-Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Akia 的 HT Score 为 67,Loopon 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问