The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 152 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Allotz 表现出色 .
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
基于 HTR 上 152 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 152 |
在分析了 152 条经验证的评价后,Allotz 用户最看重其 ,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #18 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software means balancing features, usability, support, and cost. Allotz HMS by Allotz aims to automate and optimize revenue via a comprehensive cloud platform, but it lacks reviews and recent data to back its claims. Visual Matrix PMS, with its 143 reviews and recent feedback, offers a more tested and well-rounded solution. How do these two compare on key aspects that impact your hotel’s operations?
Both Allotz HMS and Visual Matrix PMS address the core hotel management challenges—streamlining operations, managing reservations, and boosting revenue. However, Allotz positions itself as an all-in-one revenue-focused platform, emphasizing automation and real-time analytics, whereas Visual Matrix offers a more traditional PMS with extensive integrations and operational modules. With no recent reviews or high user ratings, Allotz’s reliability remains unproven, contrasting sharply with Visual Matrix’s solid 92% likelihood to recommend and active user base.
Do you prioritize proven reliability or an emerging, potentially innovative platform?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform focused on revenue automation, real-time analytics, and online distribution, go with Allotz HMS. Its market focus is on automation and distribution management, suitable for mid-sized to large properties seeking high-tech solutions. Conversely, if your team values a highly-rated property management system with a broad feature set, including housekeeping, booking engine, and multi-channel integrations, Visual Matrix PMS is the better choice. Its extensive features and proven user satisfaction make it more reliable for daily operations.
For hotels seeking growth through online channels and revenue optimization, Allotz’s automation might be appealing. For those prioritizing operational efficiency and existing integrations, Visual Matrix offers more immediate benefits.
Based on available data, Visual Matrix PMS earns a high ease-of-use score (4.43/5) and is praised for its user-friendly interface and minimal training needs. Customers appreciate its intuitive dashboards, mobile app, and straightforward scheduling tools, making staff onboarding smoother. Allotz’s ease of use scores are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, its user experience remains uncertain.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 55 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, and automation tools like digital registration and automated night audits. Allotz’s platform lacks detailed feature data but markets itself as an automated, revenue-driven system with real-time analytics. Given the comprehensive feature list of Visual Matrix, which covers daily operations and guest engagement, it clearly leads in feature depth.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS enjoys a support rating of 4.34/5, with reviews highlighting knowledgeable, friendly support and quick responses. Customers note that support is responsive and helpful, especially in onboarding. Allotz’s support ratings are unavailable, with no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge its responsiveness or quality.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix PMS integrates with 23 partners, including major channel managers, CRS, and key hotel technology providers like SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Allotz, by comparison, has only 5 verified partners, with integrations limited to hotel channel management and basic distribution tools. If your hotel relies on multiple integrations, Visual Matrix’s broad ecosystem offers a significant advantage.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Since Allotz has no reviews or ratings, we rely on Visual Matrix’s extensive user feedback. With 143 reviews and a 92% likelihood to recommend, Visual Matrix is favored across property types, especially branded hotels and resorts. Review recency (more than nine reviews in the last six months) indicates a stable and satisfied user base. The absence of recent feedback for Allotz makes it a risky choice for immediate implementation.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Allotz’s pricing is not publicly available, but it appears to market itself as a premium, customizable solution without trial options. Visual Matrix PMS costs $500/month without mention of setup fees or tiered pricing, making it transparent and predictable. If budget transparency is critical, Visual Matrix offers a clear, fixed monthly fee.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in proven user satisfaction and feature completeness. Visual Matrix PMS provides a well-rounded, extensively reviewed platform with broad integrations and strong support, making it a safer choice for most hoteliers. Allotz, while promising automation and analytics, lacks recent customer feedback and a broad feature set, making it a riskier investment without further validation.
If your priority is a trusted, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, choose Visual Matrix PMS. It offers more immediate operational benefits and a predictable cost structure.
Consider Allotz only if your hotel needs high-level revenue automation and online distribution tools, and you are willing to risk an unreviewed platform for future innovation.
In summary, Visual Matrix PMS stands out as the more reliable and user-approved system today, especially given its active user base and recent positive feedback. Allotz’s capabilities remain promising but unproven in the current landscape.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Allotz HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Allotz HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Allotz HMS 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Visual Matrix PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Allotz HMS:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Allotz 的 HT Score 为 0,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问