项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 27 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 5 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 28 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 79 条评价 |
Choosing between Altitude by Altitude and straiv by straiv for contactless check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Altitude is a newer platform with no recent reviews and an unestablished reputation, whereas straiv boasts over 80 reviews, with most recent feedback from the last six months. Straiv’s higher review count and performance ratings make it the more reliable option for your hotel today.
Both products aim to streamline guest arrivals and reduce front-desk contact, but their features, integrations, and support models diverge. The crucial question is: which platform aligns better with your operations and guest expectations?
Altitude markets itself as a comprehensive cloud-based property management platform designed exclusively for accommodation providers, with over 100 modules spanning check-in, guest requests, and back-end management. Its core focus is elevating the entire guest experience through modular tools, including self-service kiosks and guest apps.
straiv, on the other hand, specializes in contactless, digital guest journeys, emphasizing online check-in, messaging, and upselling. Its platform is built to enhance operational efficiency through guest self-service on smartphones, without the need for apps, and boasts a broad integration ecosystem.
While Altitude offers a wide array of features suitable for full property management, straiv’s strength lies in contactless guest processes and integration with existing PMS systems. Which of these priorities aligns more with your hotel’s goals?
If your hotel needs a broad, all-in-one management system with extensive guest and back-of-house features, Altitude is the better fit. It offers a suite of 19 shared and exclusive features, including document scanning, pre-registration, and multilingual check-in, suited for larger or multi-service properties.
Alternatively, if streamlining check-in and enhancing guest contactless experience are your top priorities, straiv should be your choice. Its 10 unique features—like mobile check-in, guest messaging, and upselling—are designed to reduce staff workload and improve guest satisfaction, especially for limited-service or boutique hotels.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive platform with diverse operational tools, Altitude has the edge. If your primary focus is on contactless guest experience and ease of integration, straiv is more suitable.
Straiv scores higher on ease of use with a 4.69/5 rating and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface. Hoteliers highlight its straightforward implementation, with comments like “the system is simple and quick to adopt,” and note that staff and guests adapt easily without extensive training.
Altitude, however, has a zero rating in ease of use, reflecting a lack of recent reviews and possibly a less user-friendly design. Given the limited feedback, it’s difficult to confirm its onboarding ease or staff acceptance.
Edge: straiv.
Altitude offers 19 features, with 10 exclusive options such as easy room selection, document scanning, and multilingual check-in, designed to cover the full guest journey and back-of-house needs. Its modules support complex operations, including deposit collection and legal sign-offs.
straiv provides 10 features, including mobile check-in/out, guest messaging, and upselling, focusing on contactless guest service. It integrates with property management systems for streamlined operations, but lacks extensive back-end features found in Altitude.
The choice depends on your hotel’s operational scope. For comprehensive management, Altitude’s wider feature set is advantageous; for guest-centric, contactless processes, straiv’s feature count and usability are superior.
Edge: straiv.
straiv’s support scores 4.72/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and proactive updates. Users appreciate quick problem resolution and the availability of dedicated support teams, with comments like “Support is helpful and always ready to assist.”
Altitude, on the other hand, has no recent ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Its absence of recent feedback suggests a less established or less responsive support structure.
Edge: straiv.
straiv integrates with 36 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Protel, and SALTO, offering broad compatibility for hotel operations and guest management. Seven partners are common with Altitude, but straiv’s larger ecosystem indicates greater flexibility.
Altitude’s 17 verified integrations are primarily focused on PMS and door access systems, with fewer options for ancillary hotel services. If extensive third-party integrations are critical, straiv’s larger partner network offers more options.
Edge: straiv.
With 81 reviews and recent ratings, straiv earns a 4.81/5 overall score, with reviews praising its ease of use, support, and contactless check-in. Hoteliers in boutique, city-center, and serviced-apartment segments particularly favor its simplicity and reliability.
Altitude, lacking recent reviews, cannot be reliably rated but appears to have minimal user feedback. The absence of recent reviews makes straiv the more trusted choice among hoteliers currently.
Edge: straiv.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $500, with no mention of hidden fees or tiered subscription models. Neither offers a free tier or trial, implying the initial investment is straightforward but fixed.
Because pricing details are similar, your decision should focus on features and support rather than cost.
Hotels that benefit most from Altitude include:
Not ideal if:
straiv suits:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Altitude offers a full property management solution with a broad feature set, while straiv concentrates on contactless guest journeys and operational efficiency. If your hotel needs a complete management system, Altitude’s extensive modules give you more options.
Choose Altitude if you value back-end management, multi-lingual support, and a wide array of features that cover all operational aspects. Opt for straiv if your goal is to deliver a smooth, contactless guest experience with minimal staff workload and high ease of use.
For hotels seeking a proven, highly-rated platform with recent reviews, straiv remains the stronger option. Its higher review count and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice for your contactless check-in needs today.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
到达前和登记入住
|
|
|
| 酒店网站入住门户 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 自助结账 | ||
| 自助值机 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
|
▾
信息收集
|
|
|
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 条款和条件签署 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 | ||
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
|
▾
翻译
|
|
|
| 自动翻译 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
|
▾
付款与授权
|
|
|
| 登记卡电子签名 | ||
| 收取押金 | ||
| 付款和授权 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
|
▾
手机钥匙
|
|
|
| 门锁集成 | ||
|
▾
升级和追加销售
|
|
|
| 到货前追加销售和升级 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 经前管理系统整合 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论者提到自动化邮件、预抵达沟通以及其他客人消息是核心优势。Straiv 帮助酒店在客人到达前保持信息畅通,减少手动跟进,尽管一些评论指出邮件布局和消息... 许多评论者提到自动化邮件、预抵达沟通以及其他客人消息是核心优势。Straiv 帮助酒店在客人到达前保持信息畅通,减少手动跟进,尽管一些评论指出邮件布局和消息数量仍有改进空间。
用户普遍称赞Straiv让预入住和自助入住变得快速、简便、低摩擦,无论是对宾客还是员工。评价指出它减轻了前台工作负担,加快了到店流程,并带来了更顺畅的宾客体... 用户普遍称赞Straiv让预入住和自助入住变得快速、简便、低摩擦,无论是对宾客还是员工。评价指出它减轻了前台工作负担,加快了到店流程,并带来了更顺畅的宾客体验,尤其是在模板和自动化设置得当的情况下。
一个反复出现的主题是,Straiv 通过将例行的入住任务转移到数字化流程中,减轻了前台员工的负担。酒店表示这使得服务更快捷、更舒适,同时也让员工能够专注于更... 一个反复出现的主题是,Straiv 通过将例行的入住任务转移到数字化流程中,减轻了前台员工的负担。酒店表示这使得服务更快捷、更舒适,同时也让员工能够专注于更高价值的互动和异常处理。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户喜欢定制选项、拖放式表单和灵活的模块结构,这些功能使得将Straiv适应不同酒店流程变得更容易。同时,也有人反映后台设置可能会令人困惑或耗时,尤其是在管... 用户喜欢定制选项、拖放式表单和灵活的模块结构,这些功能使得将Straiv适应不同酒店流程变得更容易。同时,也有人反映后台设置可能会令人困惑或耗时,尤其是在管理多语言内容或更换模块时。
一些酒店希望拥有更强的分析功能、更好的统计数据,以及更流畅的后台管理体验。反馈还指出后台的可用性问题,例如导航混乱、手动切换语言、不完整的报告以及不完... 一些酒店希望拥有更强的分析功能、更好的统计数据,以及更流畅的后台管理体验。反馈还指出后台的可用性问题,例如导航混乱、手动切换语言、不完整的报告以及不完善的工单历史流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Altitude 和 Straiv 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。Altitude 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Straiv 提供 38 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Straiv 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Altitude:否。Straiv:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Altitude 的 HT Score 为 0,Straiv 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐