The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 130 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 Blastness 用户则强调 专业协助与支持, 数据可访问性和灵活性, 无缝系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
+
专业协助与支持
▾
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
+
数据可访问性和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
+
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
+
收益管理工具
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
−
界面直观性问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #1 29 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | #2 42 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | #2 28 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | #2 32 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #2 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #5 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | #12 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #1 76 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | #8 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
Selecting a hotel reservations software requires balancing features, usability, support, and cost. Amadeus iHotelier® is a longstanding, widely-used CRS favored by many mid-scale and chain hotels for its extensive integration and comprehensive capabilities, but recent reviews suggest it may lag behind in user-friendliness and support responsiveness. Blastness CRS, on the other hand, is newer but highly rated for ease of use and personalized support, especially by independent hotels seeking direct bookings and revenue growth. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products solve the core challenge of managing reservations, distribution, and revenue maximization but approach these with different emphases. Amadeus offers a broad feature set, including call center functions and guest profiles, making it suitable for larger or chain hotels that need extensive integration and customization. Blastness focuses primarily on simplicity, real-time updates, and boosting direct bookings, making it more appealing to independent hotels looking for streamlined management. Given the divergent backgrounds, are you in need of a fully integrated enterprise system or a straightforward, effective solution?
If your hotel requires a globally recognized CRS with a broad partner network, detailed market intelligence, and advanced channel management, Amadeus is the better fit. Its extensive integrations (104 verified partners) and detailed analytics are ideal for larger properties or chains aiming for comprehensive control. Conversely, if your independent hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and direct revenue growth, Blastness's high rating (100/100) and dedicated support make it the clear choice. Which profile more accurately describes your hotel’s operational priorities?
Amadeus’s ease of use scores 4.43/5, but reviews note a steep learning curve that can initially hinder staff adoption. Its onboarding process scores 4.1/5, and some users mention that initial understanding of its complex features takes time. Blastness scores higher at 4.89/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and simple navigation from the start. Support and onboarding ratings further favor Blastness, which boasts a 4.94/5 onboarding score and glowing review quotes praising its straightforward setup. Edge: Blastness.
Amadeus offers 16 shared features plus 2 unique, including call center functionality and guest profiles, which are absent in Blastness. It provides extensive capabilities in distribution, guest management, and advanced analytics. Blastness provides all core reservation and channel management features and boasts two unique ones: availability management and a mobile app, tailored for independent hotels seeking simplicity. While Amadeus’s feature depth is unmatched, Blastness’s streamlined tools cater to hotels seeking core functionalities with ease. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores 4.15/5, with reviews noting helpful but sometimes delayed responses. Many users appreciate their professional approach yet mention the need for quicker support and more localized assistance in certain regions. Blastness scores an outstanding 4.9/5, with reviews highlighting personalized, quick, and ongoing support that guides hotels through setup and daily use. Users describe Blastness support as “responsive and professional,” with no significant complaints. Edge: Blastness.
Amadeus leads with 104 verified partners, including major PMS, GDS, and channel managers, offering extensive integration options. Shared partners include Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Duetto, with many exclusive integrations that support large-scale operations. Blastness lists 15 verified partners, mainly focusing on independent hotel tools, with common partners like Hoteliga and InnRoad, but far fewer options overall. If integration breadth is crucial, Amadeus’s network is unmatched. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus has a review count of 52, with an overall rating of 4.57/5 and an NPS score of 8.38/10, mostly from mid-scale and chain hotels. Recent reviews note usability challenges but praise its comprehensive functionality. Blastness, with 72 reviews, holds an ideal 100/100 score and a 99% likelihood to recommend, primarily from independent hotels emphasizing ease and direct revenue impact. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Blastness’s higher ratings reflect stronger current satisfaction. Edge: Blastness.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose pricing, as it typically offers customized quotes based on property size and needs. This often translates into higher costs suitable for larger operations. Blastness charges a straightforward $600 monthly fee with no hidden charges or implementation fees, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. For budget-conscious independent hotels, Blastness offers clear value—Amadeus’s pricing is better suited for larger hotel groups with complex needs.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Amadeus iHotelier® provides one of the most comprehensive CRS platforms, suited for larger hotels and chains that need extensive integration, advanced analytics, and a broad partner network. Its complex interface and higher costs make it less attractive for smaller hotels or properties seeking simplicity. Blastness, on the other hand, is a newer but highly rated solution for independent hotels focused on ease of use, direct bookings, and personalized support, at a predictable monthly fee.
If your hotel requires a scalable, globally connected CRS with detailed market intelligence, Amadeus remains a solid choice. However, if your focus is on boosting direct bookings, improving user experience, and working with a system that is easier to implement and support, Blastness is the recommended option for your hotel.
In short, for large-scale, multi-property operations, go with Amadeus. For independent hotels prioritizing straightforward management and rapid growth, Blastness clearly leads.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论称赞 Blastness 提供的专业和及时的帮助,强调了持续培训和对市场变化做出快速反应的重要性。
用户喜欢可以轻松访问全面的数据,以及灵活调整价格和设置,这有利于战略规划和调整。
用户报告称,Blastness 与现有系统集成良好,从而形成一个连贯的工作流程,没有技术故障或中断,从而提高了日常运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然总体上广受好评,但一些用户指出,Blastness 界面的某些部分可以更加直观,这将增强导航和用户体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 Blastness CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Blastness CRS 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。Blastness CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,Blastness 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问